OF THE
TIMES
Who gave them authority to decide who Tucker is allowed to interview?Well, the Pentagon, State Dept., and associated spooks want to control what people know, and how things are communicated in times of delicate or potentially dangerous circumstances, when interactions with an adversary have to be carried out with conscious purposes in mind. A journalist could go interview King Harald V in Norway about his opinions regarding the Nordstream Pipeline incident, no problem. King Harald isn't a possible adversary in a WWIII scenario. But interactions with Putin or Ali Khamenei are a whole different situation. Normally, Carlson would be jerked up short...UNLESS he's performing in an official capacity. It's long been obvious to me that Tucker is CIA through and through. As such, he has been briefed in this transparently-ridiculous role as a neutral "journalist," on what he should ask, what not to mention, how to present himself, and what the purpose of the interview is. Since there's no way Al Khamenei doesn't know his true role, the two of them will be cooperating to say things that the elites want the public in both countries to believe. It's all about propaganda. Tucker is a major intelligence asset, and a valuable one. What amazes me is that people don't seem to grok (at least that I have seen) that Tucker's access to Khamenei's and Putin's dance cards makes his true role patently obvious.
Carlson has had numerous guests on his program to discuss matters which directly implicate the CIA and other elements of the MIC.Pay attention to what you just said. The normal "national security risk" rules don't apply to Tucker Carlson. Let the implications of this sink in.
Tucker is a major intelligence asset, and a valuable one.It's obvious, they have a large selection of actors pretending to be human.
You know if you want to - being Israel, the country as it exist presently - well you could keep sending missiles in there and the folks would all live in bunkers - so why did you stop?
Oh and please - that question was rhetorical so fore you answer - if they attack again - is that what you will do? Cause being there is evidence some of the missiles got through and caused serious damage - if you do that they will eventually beg for mercy assuming they don't send the nukes.....and if they intend on doing that - do you have moles there as well?
~
So, the country of Israel - started in 1948 after WW's one and two - and of course the Brits were involved - Balfour and all - does that place have the history of Persia in wisdom?
~
Consider this:
[Link]