OF THE
TIMES
Shangri The Chinese thought police also monitor their citizens while abroad.Wow! Why do people keep believing that China's government (Chinese Technocrats 2.0 [Link] )is good because it is trading with Russia? The country is a swamp of technocracy and social control. Major corporations including American weapons manufacturers use the slave labor there.
The West has some ideological view of China, simply because they are denied access, and what is created in the news is a confabulation.The technocracy government of China is not a western ideological view. It is the underlying form of world government - globalism. Rule by international corporations(industry monopolies), billionaires soon to be trillionaires ("stakeholders"), and scientist minions ("trust the science" in government and the real science IP we don't see) and most importantly the intelligence agencies(unified since World War II world wide)... technocracy is all about social control and behavior control. To fool people they leave national governments/states/cultures/arbitrary borders and flags "optics" for the ideologically national driven masses...
Shangri I believe russia is also big on Tech surveillance - BorisYep technocracy is big in Russia: 'Resetting Without Schwab: Russia & the Fourth Industrial Revolution' [Link]
Are we putting an over-emphasis on a "maybe"?Well put
You should only be worried if you can prove nefarious reasons behind a surveillance state. There are always pros and cons. You make demands for problems to be solved but when given the answer declare that it is a surveillance state. But you fail to understand you can't have it both ways.The "nefarious reasons" is the lack of access or forced to do things one needs to live unless one complies. For example, no food for you until you take the shot. Or you said something the ministry of truth disagrees with ("The Earth is Flat" regardless of the actual truth) and now you are not allowed to travel to say Canada...
Except that has never been a requirement or forced upon so you have nothing to base that assumption on. You are using baseless hypothetical situations that have never occurred.Take the covid shot or lose your job.
You are supposed to comply with the laws. So not complying with the laws causes lack of access? Well yes. It is called jail. Which also makes it so you can't travel to Canada.Just because it is a law doesn't mean one should comply. Especially if the law is unjust.
Or are you saying ignorance should be allowed? What use does ignorance serve? It holds back progress and creating a united society. You think people should be allowed to teach ignorance and cause it to spread? That's destructive to society.It isn't about ignorance directly(though that is a goal since it helps with control). Instead it is diss-information (the state knowingly saying something that isn't true but there is benefit from the population believing it or being scared to speak out against what is obviously false - and also often a diversion from the truth). It is all about control at the end of the day. Fear and sex(unknowing bliss) are the main emotional tools of control. Technate populations aren't united they are controlled. And I am against that. I would rather live in a free society personally. How about you? Would you want restrictions on what text you can examine to pattern match and be only allowed to examine idioms of the vernacular? What if I had "talked" out this instead:
You do know certain jobs require you to get vaccines in order to work for them right? Any company can make that a requirement to work for them. You aren't being forced. You can go get a job elsewhere that doesn't require it. It's not a requirement to have a job.'Elderly man taken to ground by officers after refusing to take Covid-19 test in China' [Link]
All you have to do is say no. They aren't holding you down or taking your money or your assets.
We're stupid enough and do it to ourselves. Who needs the 'globalists'?!I do not want to be that stupid(be Whom The Gods Would Destroy - and more importantly add more comments there! see below but don't please). The globalists are focused on reducing the population. There are nicer more gentle ways of going about I think. My free will says that and to me that is a received message not an ugly mouth that doesn't listen or focus. I am aware of what negative thoughts (that are wrong) do and work to retrain my thoughts to exclude those. Is the sun coming? Yes we are in the start of a new age but as the movie 'Hope Floats' says: "Beginnings are scary; endings are usually sad. But it's the middle that counts the most". But hope floats to the top. [Link] Provided it is possible and not another dead end for the human race...If it is we will just be doing it over again. Walking down the same road kicking the same can.
How are globalists reducing the population?Numerous ways. Covid shots was a game changer. Just lost a friend to a shot turbo cancer in Seattle. Many more plans in the works. Gaza is an example. So is Ukraine. Raising food prices leading to starvation... Some of these methods have been used successfully in the past(the blockade of Ireland by the British during the "potato famine"). The French Revolution started by the British starving the population. The US population lost 10% mostly from starvation during the great depression. And that was when there were lots of small farms. Just imagine what they can do now with all the digital control in place and increasing(Bill Gates owning the land in the US...Trump about to sell it to the Bankers/Robbers)? 10% of all chickens in the US are now dead to stop the fake "Bird Flu" fear(with shots for that coming)...
If they are it isn't working. Especially since the death rate is falling and the birth rate rising. It is quite the opposite of your claim.Contraire!! 'Excess mortality’ continuing surge causes concerns' [Link]
Despite some signs that excess mortality rates are declining, life insurance executives and actuaries believe the numbers are alarming and could continue to drag earnings and surge death claims for years to come.
Why should people withstand the future and advanced technologies? Is it so hard to believe things get better with these advancements? Or believe that in a finite world that keeps throwing gas on the fire everyday as population grows out of control isn't headed toward a wall where a limit is reached?Nature always balances out. The infestation of the fully automated mouthpieces, the fearfilled, is being removed. Easy, the time has finally come and peace reigns. Balance.
These technologies are becoming the brakes to avoid a cataclysm brought on by a loss of resources. It doesn't take long before the scale becomes unbalanced especially when one side is growing by exponential numbers.
There is only so much power we are able to produce before consumption overtakes that production. Then what? Are people going to declare the government being too controlling when they have to cut off your power in order to make sure critical areas are able to receive enough?
Your bully judgemental ego is the stomach of the globalists that you freewillingly fill, as do so many other posters.Observing reality and telling what I see objectively. That is not my ego "stomach of the globalists" as you attribute to ego. I do not personally benefit from my house getting DEWed or so many of the out rages being done upon us by a select few. My aim is for accuracy. There is much deception a foot walking around. God provided me with the gift of discernment and I intend to use it. It is a gift. Next life pervious lives I may have had something different.
You're still all asleep and invest in parroting all your "WANTS" intellectualism & finely-tuned geekness opinions & suppositions; manipulation on a roll. Zero respect, integrity and awareness. Consciousness is not a theory but a live experience, the WALK. So much for dat talk!!Sounds like:
There won't be an end to humanity, just a quick but slow suicided human TRASH via non-humans. Thank GOD for dat
God is in charge of LIVE and lets evil happen. Death is compost.
"Kill them all; let God sort them out."A very service to self mindset me thinks? It places one "apart" from others (begotten son and believers on one side and everyone else "TRASH" non-humans on the other). There one finds the individual who believes but that is about it...
If it was the government why would they use smart meters? Why not just plant devices that ignite fires? Why go thru all the trouble of replacing the entire unit when they could just install a small device inside the old ones?Do you know why? Because it's nonsense to believe that. When there are hundreds of easier cheaper and faster ways to start a fire.There are multiple ways and evolution of methods to curb population growth and pinpoint activities to the worst consumers vs production household offenders. They could just "install a small device inside the old one" doesn't sound cheaper actually. That was a horrible AI response. Certainly you can do better than that.
How could that be triggere? DEW or RF?There are some power companies being sued for the fires [Link] What the DEW would do is hit a substation and from there it would surge into the houses on the main lines. Also the DEW could just hit the wiring (especially if it wasn't buried) going into the house through the meter...
There's a small surge protector that you hookup. Most are used on AC units in case they are struck by lightning. My ex-father-in-law hooked one up to mine.This whole house model looks like it could help: Leviton 50240 MSA 120/240V 200 Amp Meter Socket Second Surge Arrestor [Link] But from looking at the technology TPMOV internet search says:
Surge protection devices, such as TPMOV surge protection, protect electrical equipment against transient overvoltages1. However, they may not provide complete protection against lightning strikes , and unplugging devices is the only way to guarantee full protectionSo...This may not be able to protect a DEW coming through the meter...Might help though with a lithium fire maybe?
And, yes, there have been times to say a solid NO, such as the covid crap, but, we do have to have a life in the meantime, as Hayen suggests.