"Good faith people are willing to be corrected (because the Truth is important); not so the liars of course (they know they are wrong) or the ideologues. So the ideologues therefore don't act in good faith, though they think they do."Of all the vicious lies spun around the Covid-19 operation, among the most damaging was the campaign to demonize ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning true wonder-drug, among the safest known pharmaceuticals ever, effective against disease-causing parasites and also a potent anti-viral agent — which was exactly why the CDC and FDA turned on it. It very effectively subdued Covid-19 infections.
— Truman Verdun
That is, it worked. And because of that, these agencies had to pretend that it was worthless and harmful, to protect the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the fabulous mRNA vaccines that didn't work and ended up harming, disabling, and killing many people. Any treatment that proved effective would have invalidated the EUA and negated the liability shield that came with the EUA, protecting the vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits.
A week ago, in a lawsuit brought by three doctors against the FDA for its Covid-19 restrictions, DOJ lawyer Ashley Honold told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in Louisiana that "FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat Covid." Really? After three years of bad-mouthing the drug in public service announcements — horse and cow de-wormer, not for humans! — and telling national boards of physicians not to use it, and telling the national organization of pharmacists not to fill prescriptions for it... which resulted in many states officially forbidding its use ... which led to gross injustices such as the State of Maine Medical Board's obtuse and insane persecution of bio-warfare expert and epidemiologist Dr. Meryl Nass (for which Dr. Nass is now suing them) ... and to many other state boards revoking the licenses of doctors....
Days after that howler by DOJ lawyer Honold, the FDA honchos in DC walked back what she told the court, saying, "... it has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19, nor has the agency stated that it is safe or effective for that use." The agency then invoked its battery of fake excuses for that ruling: studies are inconclusive, blah, blah, which is just more bullshit, you understand, because the bottom line is the same as ever: the FDA will not surrender the EUA and its various protections for the Covid vaccines. And it will employ any official lie to support that position.
It also happened that going back to the 2019 debut of Covid-19, Dr. Anthony Fauci, then-head of the NIAID and Francis Collins then-head of the NIH — two related agencies that funded and supported coronavirus gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology — received many millions of dollars in "royalties" for their part in developing mRNA vaccines against the Covid-19 pathogen that they had priorly developed (the total dollar figure rumored to be above $300-million). See how that worked?
If you are among that segment of the population that has not lost its mind, you might realize that the public health authorities have no authority. They lied outrageously about everything connected with Covid-19. And when they were caught lying, they just lied some more in the vain attempt to cover up their previous lies. And so, it would be foolish to regard anything they say from now on — without a complete house-cleaning of agency personnel, plus some earnest prosecutions — as worth listening to and following.
Authority, you see, is granted only to those who are trustworthy. Yes, it's really that simple. If an authority lies about everything, and is caught doing it, then it is rendered invalid. Now, it happens that the US public health agencies, huge and costly as they are, make up only one part of the even larger and costlier US government, which has been busy surrendering the authority of all its other parts for years now, to the point that the whole enterprise is untrustworthy and in need of a severe housecleaning. Traditionally, elections are the mechanism for cleaning that house, but our elections have lost their authority, too? Really? How so? Because the untrustworthy officials in charge of them employ dubious systems for gathering the vote: mail-in balloting that invites fraud and hackable vote-counting machines that are connected to the Internet.
The defects of these things are so obvious they can hardly be ignored. And the remedy is obvious and simple, too: paper ballots hand-counted in small precincts of manageable size, all done on one day, which we call Election Day (and which should be a national holiday, so more working people can get to the polls). Somehow, though, we are unable to avail that remedy, probably because the untrustworthy people in charge would lose their jobs and the power they enjoy in a truly fair election. So, they conclude, let's not have that.
It's even looking like the untrustworthy public health authorities are ramping up yet a new, fresh Covid-19 scare for the fall, in order to reinforce the special mail-in voting scheme that's working so nicely (for them), and to disorder the minds of the public so they'll be too frightened to notice that all the other parts of the government are failing in virtually all their duties to the people of this land. Bring on some new Covid variants and the lovely new booster vax that'll work so well (not). Go ahead, we should say, I dare you. We won't be fooled again.
Reader Comments
The article suggests that, "If an authority lies about everything, and is caught doing it, then it is rendered invalid." But you need a majority to remove the 'authority' and we just don't have it.
Yet.
I wonder what it will take?
A mostly upper respiratory infection, that effects mostly the elderly and those that are immune-comprised.
I wonder how many have learned the lesson of never again? It has fallen on deaf ears, when it comes to military conflict.
I never got a flu shot in my life, and I'm 56 soon.
The worst case of flu (if that was it since now it looked like an early version of COVID) me and my wife caught just by the end of December 2012 and lived through most of January 2013, in Tbilisi, Georgia. Little did we know what the US biotech did in the Richard Lugar lab there.
Never before or after we had to endure anything like that.
This is a good way of removing many agencies from the government, like the FBI, FDA, NIAID, NIH, CIA, most of Congress, the Bribem admin and cabinet. Think of the tax dollars we will save, especially removing the black ops.
@Joan:
Mirrors don't work for everyone.
ned
Has anybody called you out as a shill? I am surprised, your comments betray you.
A reaper of minds, not working at SOTT. Must try harder, I remember that was one of the phrases on my school report.
"When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me.”
It means there is still hope for you yet .
Just a question to ponder from someone concerned for your well-being.
Like for example:
Only paying attention to information that confirms your beliefs about issues.
Choosing news sources that present stories that support your views.
Refusing to listen to the opposing side.
Not considering all of the facts in a logical and rational manner.
You are only seeking to confirm existing opinions which helps limit mental resources you need to use to make decisions. It also helps protect self-esteem by making you feel that your beliefs are accurate.
You clearly thrive on being contrary and spewing everything the presstitutes of th MSM have told you is the TRUTH.
It gets tiresome - but I do notice folk are starting to ignore your comments generally
The planet rotates around the sun on the same path so that makes no difference in changing of the temperature.
This isn't MSM its physics.
Also from Professor Lindzen: “CO2… it’s not a pollutant… it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis… if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.”
Are you aware that 1500 of the world’s leading climate scientists and professionals in over 30 countries have signed a declaration that there is no climate emergency and have refuted the United Nations claims in relation to man-made climate change? [Link]
Dr Mototaka Nakamura, PhD in Meteorology from MIT, specialized in abnormal weather and climate change at MIT, Georgia Institute of Technology, NASA, Duke University, and many other prestigious institutions for 25 years. His statement? “Our models are mickey-mouse mockeries of the real world”.
This isn't physics, it's a scheme for total control of the world's resources and people.
Twenty-two professors from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have written to Donald Trump to say that climate change poses a serious risk to humanity, disavowing a retired colleague who claimed it did not.
The letter was sent after Richard Lindzen, an emeritus professor at the renowned institute, urged the President to withdraw the United States from international efforts to limit global warming, claiming such actions were not justified by the science
And you do realize how much of a technological difference it is from 40 years ago and now right and how those advancements make it more accurate and precise? Geez someone is stuck in 1980's probably when they stopped learning anything.
The amount of solar energy that Earth receives has followed the Sun’s natural 11-year cycle of small ups and downs with no net increase since the 1950s. Over the same period, global temperature has risen markedly. It is therefore extremely unlikely that the Sun has caused the observed global temperature warming trend over the past half-century.
But if such a Grand Solar Minimum occurred, how big of an effect might it have? In terms of climate forcing – a factor that could push the climate in a particular direction – solar scientists estimate it would be about -0.1 W/m2, the same impact of about three years of current carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration growth.
The warming caused by the greenhouse gas emissions from the human burning of fossil fuels is six times greater than the possible decades-long cooling from a prolonged Grand Solar Minimum.
Warming from increased levels of human-produced greenhouse gases is actually many times stronger than any effects due to recent variations in solar activity.
Ich bemitleide die Nicht-Geimpften
Yeah, boli is right, stop feeding the troll.
Tu quoque: An ad hominem fallacy which does not attack a person for random, unrelated things, but instead attacks them for some perceived fault in how they have presented their case.