Estonia wants to close Gulf of Finland to block Russia access to Baltic Sea - reports

Lemuel Gulliver

Yet, by Estonia's unilateral, reckless actions, those 1.3 million people can drag the other 948 million people of NATO into a nuclear World War.

I am very sure they are not acting on their own. Nor perpetrated by people that have Estonian interests in mind.

As in the Ukraine.

And Poland, and Germany, and France, and ...

codis Yeah, its getting rather difficult to remember when the last time any government did something positive for the people who blindly follow them. My Ukrainian friend showed me a video sent from the town her family lives in, six military thugs grab a guy off the street and toss him in a waiting van, she said this is how they obtain “volunteers” for Russian target practice.

Psstoffgoy Perhaps you saw reports lately, about disabled men about to be conscripted. Like one on topwars.ru lately, about a man without arms. My wife's friend back in the Ukraine told a similiar story on the phone lately, a disabled acquaintance of her was summoned as well.

Latest when they run out of men, something is going to happen. At the moment, several thousand Nato "volunteers" are already on the front, under different cover stories.

I am pretty sure the Russians know that these promised Western tanks will be mostly manned by Western/Nato crews. Which is IMHO why both the Germans and the Americans refuse to supply their Leopards/Abrams.

Lemuel Gulliver Alex Christoforou (The Duran) suggests that countries with a population of less than 5 million should be excluded from NATO and the EU

codis Estonia's GDP is only $39 billion. A relatively small bribe can make their "leaders" incredibly rich

Lemuel Gulliver,

This illustrates the insanity of NATO. Estonia has a population of 1,329,000 people, and the 30 countries of NATO have a population of 949 million. Yet, by Estonia's unilateral, reckless actions, those 1.3 million people can drag the other 948 million people of NATO into a nuclear World War.

Agree.

That’s how & what Fascism (Nazism) is. Not a single Rod/Stick but a bundle of Rods/Sticks/Fagotto bound (think NATO & EU Union) bound together to form a collective whole that is not remotely independent ruled by totalitarian dictatorship. Joining Nazi groups/clubs/organizations has its consequences.

Fascism : a way of organizing a society in which a government ruled by a dictator controls the lives of the people and in which people are not allowed to disagree with the government [Link] [Link] [Link]

VooDoo6 Quoting a certain qualified person to the topic of fascism (not the Austrian one):

All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.

Fascism entirely agrees with Mr. Maynard Keynes

VooDoo6 Your description: "That’s how & what Fascism (Nazism) is. Not a single Rod/Stick but a bundle of Rods/Sticks/Fagotto bound (think NATO & EU Union) bound together to form a collective whole that is not remotely independent ruled by totalitarian dictatorship," ... sounds remarkably like a description of a Communist dictatorship: " From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs... You will own nothing, and you will be happy... All for one, and one for all.. . Long live the Glorious Revolution .. . Too much free thought leads to too much free speech, which is dangerous and counter-revolutionary ."

I believe there is very little difference between the two. Both are basically dictatorships by psychopathic moral degenerates, who think its is their prerogative to tell everyone else what to think and how to live their lives, down to the tiniest detail.

Lemuel Gulliver Yes agree & was hoping you would make that connection.

Both forms are actually created by ruling Masonic Zionist system we are still under. Semiotics confirm that fact, tons of book research etc. Imo, Academia are order followers & write what they are told to write.

These two articles in below links give some good accurate info on the whole Gordian Knot mess. The past twistory maps tell a decent story about Poland’s past Empire’s twistory, struggles including the Ethno-linguistic problems. Gives some more hints at how it’s done.

FTR, Putin & Bush’s are genuine friends. Fishing buddies telling fish stories. Both are FM’s.

The Ukrainian Nationalist Movement is bought and paid for by the CIA [Link]
The Empire on Which the Black Sun Never Set : the Birth of International Fascism and Anglo-American Foreign Policy. [Link]
Fish Stories [Link]
Namaste’

VooDoo6 It is not widely appreciated that Communism was an utter failure. Without loans and funding from Wall Street Jewish bankers, the Soviet Union would never have been established (Lenin was funded by Kuhn, Loeb & Co. with $22 million funneled through Sweden,) and would have collapsed very quickly.

I have come to realize that the entire Cold War was a sham. Capitalism was not the enemy of Communism. Both were funded by the bankers. Under Communism the bankers controlled the Revolution and its Nomenklatura, and the Nomenklatura had 200 million slaves working for them, so in effect the Wall Street bankers controlled the 200 million slaves of the Soviet Union by proxy, and controlled also all the natural resources and commerce owned by the Soviet State. Nothing was as it seemed, in spite of the two sides coming within a whisker of nuclear war on several occasions.

Anthony Sutton has written several books on the Wall Street funding of the Soviet Revolution. Nobody has said so, but I have my suspicions as to why the Tsar and all his family had to die, which was done by the order of Jacob Schiff of Kuhn Loeb, who had funded Lenin, and my theory is this: That the gold reserves of Russia, the largest in the world at the time, vanished during the Revolution. I speculate that those missing hundreds of tons of gold were stored by the Tsar in new York banks for safety, and by murdering the ENTIRE family, no claimants could ever come forward to claim it. Just my hypothesis from the circumstantial evidence.

Before WWII, I have also read that the Nazi economic miracle was also funded by Wall Street, and even during the war, Prescott Bush was charged with trading with the enemy, so the pattern repeats, even today in Ukraine.

Lemuel Gulliver Agree with all you wrote. No prob easy day & true. I have read all of Prof. Anthony Sutton’s books (Eustace Mullins is another truther) & he wrote truth obviously. Wall Street (“Wolf on Wall Street” is Code btw) is concatenated to BIS/IMF/World Bank/CIA which are connected to BlackRock/Vanguard stakeholders. Capitalism/Communism/Socialism/Fascism/Fabian Socialism/Totalitarianism/Dictators are all creations of same ruling hierarchy that are hybrids based on Rome/Egypt/Greece once you peel back the layers of the onion & get to it’s core.

People should asking themselves why the Roman Fasces hang in the US House. [Link]

VooDoo6 I had not seen those photos. Interesting. Thank you! The fasces of course are a symbol that goes back to the Roman Empire, which may be the reason they hang in the Capitol Building. Our Founding Fathers and their successors had visions of empire, in spite of their declarations to the contrary, and drew their inspirations for our Constitution from Greece, Rome, and the Five Nations of the Iroquois Federation. The fasces were adopted as his trademark by Mussolini, whose vision was a reconstituted Roman Empire in 20th-Century Italy. They thus gave their ancient name to the new concept of "fascism." History is fascinating!

Lemuel Gulliver Imo, It is the exactly the reason they overtly (yet cryptically never explained why they are there) hang in the House of Rep.

Fact, all Masonic power/force is predicated on Rome’s/UK’s ruling tenets. I have tried to expose that simple truth as best I can. Hence the Club of Rome’s meaning. Look at this link & explain why George Washington’s right foot is shackeled on the left side of the Roman Arch ? [Link] (first picture) This link shows a picture of the shackled right foot also [Link] as in Slave of Rome.

Why is there a Roman “Arch” exactly like Rome has in New York ? [Link]
Notice the Greek word for Archon [Link]
Archon; one of the nine chief magistrates of ancient Athens, 1650s, from Greek arkhon "ruler, commander, chief, captain ," noun use of present participle of arkhein "be the first," thence "to begin, begin from or with, make preparation for;" also "to rule, lead the way, govern, rule over, be leader of, " a word of uncertain origin.

Hmmm, same spelling as Archon in Bible some years after Christ but a completely different meaning. Gnostic Basilidians from that era have some explaining to do eh.

It’s up to people to research it if they want to know answers to the mysteries, twistory & truth.

I think that “The New Atlantis” by Bacon or even Thomas More’s “Utopia“ were thought incubators for seeds/frontiers/constellations of thought (how to develop a better society/civilization apparatus/structure/model as people wrote they’re visions/dreams then. They didn’t blog or use social media to share ideas/seeds of thought/sparks for Prairie Fires etc.) was the Utopian vision (Bacon was Freemason & AMROC) the ruling hierarchy was after initially. I don’t think Atlantis was real. If I end up being wrong then I will adjust my beLIEf &knowledge accordingly.

I think either Plato‘s Atlantis “Beyond the Pillars of Hercules” was a metaphor visionary reference speaking as in allusion/illusion/elusion/delusion of Mythos or someone fraudulently altered/or interpreted Plato’s dialogues Timaeus and Critias or is misinterpreting a metaphor for tangible reality. We see this all the time every day 365/24/7. Like the forever elusive Missing Link, Yeti, Sasquatch, Loch Ness Monster. People pay money to beLIEve in myths/mythos it’s part of the psyche & human condition. Until they are proven to exist (tangible/palpable truth not eye wit/fuzzy-blurry/CGI Ziowood FX’s/pictures)

Thera/Santorini Greece is similarly shaped to Atlantis & was wiped out by natural disaster Minoan Eruption/Thera Cauldron Eruption. It was very common in that era for myths/mythos to be thought of as real due to the ignorance of the typical human being then not being educated in any of the Trivium/Quadrivium subjects. I know that the island of Crete became the english word creation because the Vatican was playing word games with Latin & eventually killed Latin language for a reason. I knew Knossos of Crete was believed to be the oldest origin of that era which of course was long before the Vatican’s timeline of Christ. The name Knossos was formerly Latinized as Cnossus or Cnossos and occasionally Knossus, Gnossus, or Gnossos. Notice it’s amazingly & coincidentally similar to Gnosis.

Namaste’

VooDoo6 Very interesting connections you suggest. I couldn't quite make out the shackles on GW's feet from the photos. And although I lived in NYC (Queens, not Manhattan) for 10 years or so, I never examined the Washington Arch close-up.

Regarding your other speculations, I think it quite plausible that Atlantis did in fact exist, and that there have been many civilizations prior to ours. Moreover, that those vanished civilizations had advanced technologies which we have lost due to the total destruction of periodic global cataclysms. Here is a book, The Adam and Eve Story , which was written by Chan Thomas in the 1960s, banned by the CIA, and then rewritten and re-published only in 1993. The reason it was banned, I believe, is that the author revealed the secret of antigravity, which he still refers to in several places in the later 1993 version, but never explains. [Link] The actual book is available at astronomical prices on Ebay, but here you have it in a pdf scan for free.

Please read the whole thing, except that when he rephrases the Book of Genesis, I found that tiresome and skipped over it. I am not a Christian, and am not interested in a lengthy interpretation of Biblical verses. It is actually two books, the second being a so-called Afterword, which is extremely interesting. Don't miss it.

The explanation of how the crust of the Earth can slip on its core is revealed starting at the bottom of Page 107. Many more phenomena are described, except there is one consequence he does not quite fully explain. He says that the city of Tihuanaco in Bolivia was originally at sea level, and was uplifted to its present altitude of 12,500 feet by crustal slippage. How this happened is that the planet is not a perfect sphere, but bulges out around the Equator. So when the crust slipped and Bolivia found itself shifted from a temperate zone to the equator, it rose, to conform to the planetary bulge at the equator.

Similarly, Atlantis may have been the so-called Eye of the Sahara. [Link] and [Link] (Both videos by the same author). At first, it seems implausible, because the Eye of the Sahara is over 1,000 feet in altitude, and is now far inland, but if its location had migrated towards the equator from a different latitude, this would have lifted it up due to the equatorial bulge of the Earth. Prior to that, it could indeed have been at sea level, with access to it from the Atlantic Ocean, outside the Straits of Gibraltar.

I don't think Santorini was Atlantis, because Santorini erupted and assumed its present circular volcanic-caldera form only in about 1500-1300 BC, long after Solon told Plato that Atlantis had been destroyed, which Solon said was 9,000 years before their conversation. Chan Thomas refers to this in his book. Incidentally, Santorini must have been a massive eruption, on the order of Krakatoa, destroying the Minoan civilization and many others in that area of the Mediterranean. It could have been part of the Biblical Exodus story - it would explain many of the phenomena described there, and is about the right time frame.

Pierre Lescaudron on SOTT also proposed a crustal slippage in his superb article (below) on SOTT, but he did not know about Chan Thomas' book, and the mechanism on Page 107 which makes it possible, so I corresponded with him and pointed him to it. He was very interested, and said he was writing a book on global cataclysms. Here is his article:

This will give you a lot to look into - many hours of research, but you may find the subject as fascinating as I do. I hope you find the time to pursue these links, and to read the book. And please, pass on the knowledge to any curious folks. Enjoy, and be well, my friend.

- L.G.

Lemuel Gulliver Thank you for the link to the book, I passed it on to my brother as well. I'm looking forward to reading it!

Great conversation with VooDoo6 as well, you guys both confirm and enlighten me!

VooDoo6 Very interesting connections you suggest. I couldn't quite make out the shackles on GW's feet from the photos. And although I lived in NYC (Queens, not Manhattan) for 10 years or so, I never examined the Washington Arch close-up.

Regarding your other speculations, I think it quite plausible that Atlantis did in fact exist, and that there have been many civilizations prior to ours. Moreover, that those vanished civilizations had advanced technologies which we have lost due to the total destruction of periodic global cataclysms. Here is a book, The Adam and Eve Story , which was written by Chan Thomas in the 1960s, banned by the CIA, and then rewritten and re-published only in 1993. The reason it was banned, I believe, is that the author revealed the secret of antigravity, which he still refers to in several places in the later 1993 version, but never explains. [Link] The actual book is available at astronomical prices on Ebay, but here you have it in a pdf scan for free.

Please read the whole thing, except that when he rephrases the Book of Genesis, I found that tiresome and skipped over it. I am not a Christian, and am not interested in a lengthy interpretation of Biblical verses. It is actually two books, the second being a so-called Afterword, which is extremely interesting. Don't miss it.

The explanation of how the crust of the Earth can slip on its core is revealed starting at the bottom of Page 107. Many more phenomena are described, except there is one consequence he does not quite fully explain. He says that the city of Tihuanaco in Bolivia was originally at sea level, and was uplifted to its present altitude of 12,500 feet by crustal slippage. How this happened is that the planet is not a perfect sphere, but bulges out around the Equator. So when the crust slipped and Bolivia found itself shifted from a temperate zone to the equator, it rose, to conform to the planetary bulge at the equator.

Similarly, Atlantis may have been the so-called Eye of the Sahara. [Link] and [Link] (Both videos by the same author). At first, it seems implausible, because the Eye of the Sahara is over 1,000 feet in altitude, and is now far inland, but if its location had migrated towards the equator from a different latitude, this would have lifted it up due to the equatorial bulge of the Earth. Prior to that, it could indeed have been at sea level, with access to it from the Atlantic Ocean, outside the Straits of Gibraltar.

I don't think Santorini was Atlantis, because Santorini erupted and assumed its present circular volcanic-caldera form only in about 1500-1300 BC, long after Solon told Plato that Atlantis had been destroyed, which Solon said was 9,000 years before their conversation. Chan Thomas refers to this in his book. Incidentally, Santorini must have been a massive eruption, on the order of Krakatoa, destroying the Minoan civilization and many others in that area of the Mediterranean. It could have been part of the Biblical Exodus story - it would explain many of the phenomena described there, and is about the right time frame.

Pierre Lescaudron on SOTT also proposed a crustal slippage in his superb article (below) on SOTT, but he did not know about Chan Thomas' book, and the mechanism on Page 107 which makes it possible, so I corresponded with him and pointed him to it. He was very interested, and said he was writing a book on global cataclysms. Here is his article:

This will give you a lot to look into - many hours of research, but you may find the subject as fascinating as I do. I hope you find the time to pursue these links, and to read the book. And please, pass on the knowledge to any curious folks. Enjoy, and be well, my friend.

- L.G.

Cool. Agree with most & not with other’s. Here’s why, already been there looked into it years ago & keep coming up with same conclusions & guilty group. It never varies so far with regards to the fraud & lies. Never once. Already s busted the Pyramid fraud, GMO’s, Religions, Weather Manipulation, Education Institutions et alia etc. Lots of fraud in fact the whole country is largely predicated on lies.

If you research the Statue exactly where I articulated you will see it. Look here again on this link @ picture. There is clearly a shackle ring around his right foot. Why ? You didn’t answer why is there a Roman Arch In New York ? What’s the meaning & significance of the Roman Arch ? Why are there several Arch’s what do they really mean ? These are the real important questions vs. just accepting the typical BS answers. No different than the Statue of Albert Pike still fully intact, why does Abe Lincoln sit on a Throne chair ?

It can be nothing else. Just as Professor Anthony Sutton or Eustace Mullins already told us. Lots of pics & docs have Ben scrubbed by the PTB who know people are awake & catching them in/at their centuries of lies. Since this site doesn’t;t allow pics or teleported transportation to that locust it’s hard to show or demonstrate. You have to look into yourselves. It’s clearly a steel ring bound to his right ankle. Semiotics always tell the truth. I’m going with it’s a metaphor & a Fish Tale since there is not proof of it still & have proven there is a group that constantly fraud’s public’s perception throughout twistory. I’ll adjust my opinion & knowledge base if & when that proof of Atlantis materializes. GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) isn’t proof of Atlantis it’s proof of an anomalous structure underneath the surface. Two very different things. One thing I have learned in my time here is to challenge the whole matrix/demiurge we live in. I have have found so many glitches in the Matrix & it always comes up being the same frauds every single time. In this link the Architect reveals (Method of Revelation) METAPHORICALLY to Neo what is all about. [Link]
Regarding Chan & his book, read it & agree with you. Which helped me springboard into other constellations of thought just as Report From Iron Mountain & NASA Future of Warfare doc I already shared.

Tectonic plate & Pangea theory is nothing new. Shared it here but no one commented or even wanted a dialogue about Pangea or Tectonic Plate theory.

We disagree about Santorini for a few reasons. You’re quoting twistory. Which is flawed as we agree. The fact is we both know it has been altered & changed. I already know not to trust anything Piny the Elder, Piny the Younger, Josephus Flavius et alia have allegedly said. Why b/c just like Hitler’s Mein Kampf or even the Bible has been redacted so many times your dealing with an altered document meant to deceive or appeal to a broader narrative controlled thought just like Plato’s Cave reveals.

Been to Santorini in 2004’. Pyramids in 2010. Looked into both of the narrative vs. what I observed. I studied & examined what I could see. Both are frauds in fact the whole Roman Empire/Mithra Wars/Battle of Carthage - Byzantine Empire are miserable pastiche’s of poorly recorded (by design) twistory on purpose. How can anyone clearly focus on an opaque/muddy non-transparent twistorical recollection with so much fraud surrounding it ?

I’m aware of the Sahara hypothesis & GPR they used. Not conclusive, just evidence of a similar anomalous POSSIBLE structure. That’s a long way from ECREE standard or even a lesser cauldron of proof, Occam’s Razor.

Did you read The New Atlantis since it is highly relevant & connects to the tangent of thought how America was COLONIZED. Notice the root word COLONY. Hmmm where did that term originate ? What other Ruling Monarchy/Hierarchy used that term ?.

Did you know George Washington was not the first American POTUS as we are taught. There were several before him in fact.

Looked but found no link in you posting: 👇

“Pierre Lescaudron on SOTT also proposed a crustal slippage in his superb article (below) on SOTT, but he did not know about Chan Thomas' book, and the mechanism on Page 107 which makes it possible, so I corresponded with him and pointed him to it. He was very interested, and said he was writing a book on global cataclysms. Here is his article:”

???

Namaste’

VooDoo6 Hi again,

I suspect you did not watch either of those two videos on the Eye of the Sahara. You should. Nothing to do with GPR, simply examining what it is, its size, its surroundings, its geology, etc., etc. It is, IMHO, a very plausible hypothesis. (I never assume anything I "know" is the eternal, final, total truth - so many times I have discovered new facts which have caused me to amend my conclusions, that I never assume I know it all. What the videos on the Eye do NOT discuss is how come it now sits over 1,000 feet above sea level. He does not know about Chan Thomas. Crustal slippage and the uplift of the Eye due to the planet's equatorial bulge explain it.

One has to keep an open mind and collect pieces of the jigsaw puzzle from here and there to begin to form a picture of what may have been the truth. The only criterion is an open mind. I appreciate your sharing your information with us. Nothing, no fact, even if it appears insignificant, should be dismissed and ignored, as it just might be the missing link which mends the broken chain of knowledge.

Namaste, LG.

PS: Who were the Presidents preceding George Washington??

And what is the significance of "Colonized?"