OF THE
TIMES
Arcane Schema If this were true, Trump supporters would want the Jan. 6th commission to investigate and to expose and thereafter hold ANTIFA, BLM, and FBI accountable, but they don't.Im not an any politician supporter, so my thoughts are as unbiased as possible, in my opinion.
Trump supporters would want the Jan. 6th commission to investigateFrom what I've read Trump supporters would like "a commission" to [actually] investigate. But there's a wide gap between an actual investigative committee and the "Pelosi & Schiff Show" that we currently have.
But there's a wide gap between an actual investigative committee and the "Pelosi & Schiff Show" that we currently have.Fair enough, but okay, who that believes as you is calling for an "actual investigative committee"? I can't find anyone. Is anyone calling for an independent or a non-Pelosi/Schiff investigation? Nobody is, they all just want to deep six the whole thing instead.
Pretty much due to Adam Schiff being on the committee. That dude is a real toxic politician. Already been caught lying too many times to be taken seriously and obviously uses his lies to push his political agenda. This means the January 6th committee most likely has a direct political agenda.Which politician is not toxic or does not lie or have a political agenda? The same could be said of the ones that want the Jan. 6th committee terminated. It's for a political agenda as well.
is calling for an "actual investigative committee"The "red team" back at the start tried to have some "actual republicans" added. Their recommendations were nixed by Pelosi in favor of the "token repubs" currently on the committee.
Politicians & diapers should be changed frequently and for the same reason.)
Which politician is not toxic or does not lie or have a political agenda?Probably all of them lie and have nefarious agendas
The same could be said of the ones that want the Jan. 6th committee terminated. It's for a political agenda as well.Maybe they just see Adam Schiff taking part in running it and think the same thing I do....
We are all already dead.LOL.
Jennztina I am asking this because you consider yourself an agnostic, and at the same time you are telling exactly the same stories as are contained, for example, in the Bible or in the Chaldeans, from where the Bible drew its inspiration.Yes I am aware of this. That is the convergence. That is why I enjoy learning other bots' myths and stories and theories. Joseph Campbell covers this. All the religions and philosophies are the same, the minimal regional differences are just "window-dressing". The simulation is seeded with all sorts of myths, so the bots can pick and choose among them, to support their delusion of free will, but the core code is all the same, and it all ends the same way no matter which you choose. Think of it like choosing between McDonald's or Wendys; the difference is minimal, either way you still get a hamburger and diarrhea. And builderbot is the creator AND the destroyer. Like Kali.
All you change only the nouns.
God, creator = AI
Angel = Builderbot
Angel of destruction = Builderbot
Jennztina Yes, Kali fits better here. Do you know. that all religions of this world originated in Zoroastrianism? This is the paradigm, the archetype, of all religions that currently exist in the world. I mean, of course, the biggest, monotheistic.Religions are literally all the same except for a few minor cosmetic differences so that bots can have the illusion of free will and individuality by picking and choosing among them. The differences are irrelevant except for giving the bots stupid reasons to fight each other.
Jennztina Do you think that neurotypes require you to look into the eyes because they know it hurts you to see them lying and hypocritical? And how do you actually know that their hypocrisy and lies are not your perception program?Does it bother you if someone is speaking to you and they don't look at your eyes? What if it is a beautiful woman? Or a child? Maybe it is an American affectation, like constantly smiling for no reason. I have met many Eastern Europeans and they are not crazy in the same way Americans are, so I understand why this might seem bizarre to you. In America, smiling and staring at peoples' eyes is a social behavior that neurotypicals become murderously angry about if you don't comply. Any failure to smile and stare at their eyes is a reason for a fight. People fought me about it every day of my childhood and they still fight me about it now that I am an old woman. It is much worse as a child or a young attractive woman, because then you are someone people automatically feel entitled to control over, or attention from. I am sorry for not considering the differences between European and American character. America is an insane asylum, where the crazy people are in charge, and we all have to live by their insane rules of behavior. I have often thought that Eastern Europe and Russia are a different type or sector of the simulation, because in my experience the people I have met from there are so different, and you are correct, none of them ever did the crazy shit I'm describing. The smiling and eye contact were implemented with Positive Psychology, which is just intended to drive people nuts with constant bizarre behavior demands. I have dated Russian men and they never hassled me the way I am describing with Americans. My stepfather was Polish, he was one of the best people I ever knew, and he thought the "smiling and eye contact rules" were nuts too.
I do not know about the others, but I have never had such a situation in my life that I had to force someone to do something, especially to look.
Jennztina I will only add that I consider all contacts between people as a kind of EXPERIENCE.Lol what do you mean? They seem dishonest to you?
For me and the interlocutor. Someone may have a different opinion on something. However, criticism ALWAYS CUTS OFF THE POSSIBILITY OF EXPERIENCE.
So even if my experiences on a topic are different, it doesn't mean they are not authentic.
You are actually quite unusual. I have known and know many people described as autistic. However, I was unable to make such contact with them. They usually lie, pretending they ARE NOT LIE!
Which usually closes the way to an agreement
Jennztina Yes, they are dishonest, but I understand them. With them, dishonesty usually comes from shame.You mean they are ashamed of being autistic, so they try to hide it? If so, now we understand each other. That was what I meant when explaining the bot types, autistics who want to be neurotypical, so they try to act like them. Those are the ones I call Failbots, who typically will suicide by age 50. Because trying to fit in with the 95% neurotypical society doesn't make them happy, or they feel they have "failed" by not fitting in, when I consider them to actually be failing at being autistic, failing at being different.
They are just ashamed to tell the truth because they fear being received the wrong way.
Comment: The case must be desperate if the Committee supporters are descending into bombast. But the show trials must go on, no matter how many civil rights are trampled in the process.