© REUTERS / Dado RuvicThe company predicts it will earn as much as $102 billion in 2022, half of it due to Covid-19 vaccines and treatment
In an earnings release published on Tuesday, Pfizer estimated that it would earn between $98 billion and $102 billion in revenue this year. Pfizer expects to earn $32 billion in revenue from its Covid-19 vaccine alone, with another $22 billion of revenue from its Paxlovid antiviral Covid-19 pill.
"The midpoint of the guidance range for revenues represents 23% growth from 2021 revenues," the company declared in the report.
Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine made the company nearly $37 billion in revenue in 2021, with the company earning a total of $81.3 billion - double the amount of revenue from 2020.
Following the release of the report, The Guardian branded Pfizer's vaccine as "one of the most lucrative products in history."
Pfizer CEO Dr. Albert Bourla boasted on Tuesday that the company's pandemic "successes" had "fundamentally changed Pfizer and its culture forever."
Comment: It likely showed some employees just how they will be rewarded how if they're willing to look the other way despite knowing that the products are unnecessary and even deadly. However not all were willing to sell their souls, and some blew the whistle on the sinister goings on at the company: Project Veritas: Pfizer whistleblower goes on record revealing internal emails from CSO & Senior Director of Worldwide Research discussing COVID vaccine
In his own statement, Pfizer CFO Frank D'Amelio said he was "proud to see that the company is performing better than at any other time during my nearly 15 years here."
D'Amelio noted that, if achieved, Pfizer's 2022 expectations "would represent the highest level of annual revenues" ever in the company's "long history."
"I have never been more confident in the future of Pfizer," he concluded.
A company is launched out of thin air, its vaccine is fired hundreds of millions of times and the founders are showered with awards ...
The jug goes to the well until it breaks. The question of how shamelessly one can act could occupy courts and commissions of inquiry for decades to come. Of course, the presumption of innocence applies to all of those mentioned. Maybe this is pure coincidence.
The developers of BioNTech's BNT162b2 vaccine have been 100% owners of a company called “reBOOST” since 2019.
On 15 December 2020, reBOOST Management GmbH was renamed to reSano GmbH.
Two things in particular are noteworthy about the existence of the reBOOST company.
First, the name of the company, which anticipates the business model with booster vaccinations. The term wasn't in use until 2021, at least in Germany.
What is even more striking, however, is the focus of reBOOST's commercial activities. It focuses on treating all those diseases known to be unwanted side effects of mRNA vaccines:
Autoimmune Diseases
Cardiovascular diseases
Lung diseases
Diseases of the central nervous system
And now they are making money on vaccine diseases
If the West were a place of civilization instead of being subjected to gangs of unscrupulous marauders and magistrates acting as loyal employees of authoritarian regimes, the courts and investigative commissions would be busy for decades in the task of unraveling the tangle of corruption and conflict. of interests behind the pandemic and vaccines.
Now, for example, we discover that BionTech, Pfizer's associate was not only studying the mRna preparation against Covid, a year before Covid appeared, but in August 2019, as stated in the company's consolidated financial statements " has entered into an agreement to acquire all outstanding shares of reBOOST Management GmbH from Medine GmbH, which is 100% owned by the CEO of BioNTech, Prof. Dr. Ugur Sahin.
Apart from the total opacity of the acquisition itself which is a mess and proves that reBoost was in fact created within BionTech itself, the interesting thing is what this company promised to produce: that is, treatments all those diseases that are known to be unwanted side effects of mRNA vaccinations: autoimmune, cardiovascular, pulmonary and central nervous system diseases.
It certainly cannot be said that they weren't far-sighted: at first earning billions with a self-styled vaccine which in turn creates a series of diseases and then treating them with special drugs. In short, the complete cycle. The only thing missing is the purchase of a few hospitals and funeral homes to follow the entire cycle of a human life forcibly ill. As a business model it is certainly effective, but it remains to be understood why BionTech, which before the unexpected contributions of Bill Gates and Pfizer was in perpetual debt, guessed exactly what would be needed after the vaccination campaigns. After all, the name reBoost already anticipates the business model of booster bites, something that certainly could not have been imagined in 2019. Now the problem is to understand if the tide of serious adverse reactions had not already been taken into account and we have clearly chosen to pursue this path, instead of that of a real vaccine traditionally understood, since if we had imagined that adverse reactions had they been few, it would not have been worthwhile to set up a specific activity.
Doubt should devour people's minds instead of being dominated by fear, because in fact there was a vast literature on the NMR technique which predicts a considerable amount of adverse reactions: it has been studied for at least two decades, but in fact it has not it never worked, indeed many animal experiments were stopped at some point precisely because the guinea pigs had blood clots, embolisms, heart disease and the cages remained empty.
In short, we are faced with a question: the consequences of vaccines in such a massive and so serious number (even if the complicit and adequately compensated doctors now define "mild" myocarditis and pericarditis which until last year were considered very serious pathologies) Were they a surprise or were they instead taken into account and we were even prepared to profit from them? You really want to avoid having to answer such a question and put it out of your mind, thinking that he is a hero. Unfortunately, the bad faith with which drug multinationals have acted in previous decades shows that the worst hypothesis is, alas, absolutely in the field. After all, if an operation contemplates fear as its engine, it can very well be transferred by the virus to the consequences of the battle against it:
this is how things will be presented when the real account of all this is presented.
What about, the BARBIE BOOSTER SHOOT?????????????????????? [Link]