On December 3, Brazil's Minister of Foreign Affairs Ernesto Araujo rebuked the WEF's technocratic "great reset" of society and the global economy in a recorded speech before the special session of the UN.
Although Araujo did not say the words "great reset" or "World Economic Forum" during his speech to the UN, he made it abundantly clear in a tweet the following day that he was referring to the "great reset" agenda in his speech.
The "great reset" is the brainchild of WEF Founder Klaus Schwab, who has been planning the technocratic agenda to reset all of society and the global economy for many years.
Brazil is now pushing back against the great reset.
"Brazil is a founding member of the UN, and hence, is committed to its basic principles: peace and security, cooperation among nations, respect for human rights, and fundamental freedoms," Araujo told the UN.
"COVID-19 must not be taken as a pretext to advance agendas that extrapolate from the constitutional structure of the UN system," he added.
The Brazilian minister went on to say, "Fundamental freedoms are not an ideology. Human dignity requires freedom as much as it requires health and economic opportunities.
"Those who dislike freedom always try to benefit from moments of crisis to preach the curtailing of freedom. Let's not fall for that trap.
"Totalitarian social control is not the remedy for any crisis. Let's not make democracy and freedom one more victim of COVID-19."
Araujo is a fierce opponent of globalist ideologies.
In April, 2020, he wrote that "globalism replaces socialism as a preparatory stage for communism," and he referred to the coronavirus as the "comunavirus" after reading a recent booklet by Slovenian philosopher and communist Slavoj Zizek, from which he extrapolated that viruses were beneficial for spreading communism.
The Brazilian minister of foreign affairs was a controversial pick by President Jair Bolsonaro, partly due to Araujo's belief that climate science was a "dogma" being used "to justify increasing the regulatory power of states over the economy and the power of international institutions on the nation states and their populations, as well as to stifle economic growth in democratic capitalist countries and to promote the growth of China," The Guardian's global environment editor Jonathan Watts wrote in November, 2018.
Araujo's views that climate change science and globalism are vectors for spreading Marxist ideologies, along with his pro-nationalistic beliefs, have not won him many allies on the international stage.
As a cabinet member of the Bolsonaro administration, he has received his fair share of criticism from the media, and his Wikipedia page currently says that he "subscribes to conspiracy theories."
According to Watts, Bolsonaro chose a "foreign minister who believes climate change is part of a plot by 'cultural Marxists' to stifle western economies and promote the growth of China."
However unpopular among globalists, climate change activists, and the media Araujo may be, when he said "no to the great reset," in his words he was rejecting the exploitation of the coronavirus crisis to further an agenda set by those who "preach the curtailing of freedom."
In his speech to the UN, Araujo called for coordination and collaboration during the crisis at the international level while letting countries handle policies in their own way at the national level.
"The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future" — Klaus Schwab, WEFThe great reset agenda calls for a complete restructuring of society under a new form of stakeholder capitalism, where ownership is obsolete and privacy is non-existent thanks to invasive technologies coming out of the Fourth Industrial Revolution that will lead us to, in Schwab's words, "a fusion of our physical, our digital, and our biological identities."
No one can be truly free if they are under constant surveillance and their behavior is tracked and monitored through digital devices via the Internet of Bodies that keep a record of their every social interaction, their every purchase, their carbon footprint, their credit scores, and all of their health information — not to mention every key they smash, every link they click, and every website they visit.
Technology is a double-edged sword.
All the technologies of the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution, such as blockchain, AI, computer vision, and the IoT ecosystem can be used to help uplift people out of poverty, feed the world, and safeguard personal freedoms and privacy — giving power back to the people.
But these technologies can also be enlisted to do the exact opposite of good and enforce totalitarian control under a social credit system, like the one the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses.
Take contact tracing for example.
Part of China's Orwellian surveillance state strategy is to link the digital identities of its "netizens" to a social credit system.
They even have a contact tracing app for "deadbeat debtors" that alerts citizens with a warning whenever they come within 500 meters of someone who is in debt.
Fear of public shaming can be a strong incentive to modify one's behavior rather quickly, but the social control goes way beyond public shaming. It determines which services you can access, which information you receive, and where you can or cannot travel, based on your credit score.
You can check out China's state TV programming on the social credit system in the propaganda video below.
Proponents of the great reset agenda, like Prince Charles, John Kerry, and Justin Trudeau, say that the pandemic presents a golden opportunity to "build back better" in resetting the global economy under a new social contract.
But instead of being a mandate from the people as a response to the coronavirus crisis, the great reset agenda was cooked-up years ago by un-elected bureaucrats as a way to introduce a new form of "stakeholder capitalism" while instituting a fresh framework for global governance.
The WEF envisions a future where we the people own nothing, and we all live in a "citizen-centered welfare state" while governments and "stakeholders" own and control the means of production.
A blog post from 2016 sums up what the WEF envisions for the year 2030 quite succinctly:
"Once in awhile I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. No where I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me."There isn't much talk of freedom in the WEF's great reset discussions.
Instead, they offer a utopia of more equity, inclusivity, and prosperity by sacrificing personal ownership, privacy, and liberty — the very foundations of constitutional republics.
Reader Comments
TIY: No thanks, I'm depressed enough.
RC
In Ecuador, the Chinese and USA are now fighting over the rights to 5G data basically. USA trying (or has) loaned Ecuador 3.5 Billion, at 2.5% interest, to help them pay off Chinese debt incurred, if they pull Chinese tech (Huiwei?) out of 5G built (but not activated yet?) and replace with USA components (more like who has the right to crush us, rather than whether they have the right). Fortunately, 1. There is a new election coming up in Ecuador, and 2. the presence of the last two remaining superpowers fighting over the spoils may buy us a few years? And if not, we free people walk towards the Amazon and eventually end up in Brasil
It pays to betray.........
In ecuador, they have pulled fiber in prep for 5G in even small rural cloud forest communities, but fortunately a lot of people already have plans in place to EMP the shit out of these things everytime they go live (was planned to go live in May 2021, but the new "loan" from USA may slow down deployment). Apparently ecuador wants to be a prototype for all of south america 5G smart cities lol. Thank goodness they are still 50 years or so "behind" in many ways, but I guess time will tell. At least, as of today, food still grows on trees, birds still sit on our wires (meaning nothing has gone "live" yet), and there are constitutional protections for the rights of wildlife and nature here (meaning that technically, as the only country in the world with such laws in constitution, if they begin to kill the birds and trees like they've done elsewhere, lawsuits on a constitutional basis can be filed). Again, for what that's worth.
and amazing Polly providing 50mins of, "No One Likes You Klaus" at this [Link] Let that load, my server isn't set up to stream, I'm not YouTube . . .
I was raised to be a lady, and ladies don’t curse, but fuck these motherfuckers to hell and back for what they’ve done to me, and mine, and my country. All we Joe Blow Americans ever wanted was a little patch of land to raise a family, a job to pay the bills, and at least some illusion of freedom, and even that was too much for these human parasites. They want it all, mind, body and soul. Damn them. Damn them all.
OHMama gave voice to what’s beneath the surface for so many of us—abject disgust, barely contained fury, and dread of what’s to come. She claimed her own life to live it as she sees fit, and damn them, damn them all, who presume to rule us..."
The Gray Curtain Descends, Part 2, by Robert Gore [Link]
"...Nothing will be fair about the coming fight. It’s no use whining about the other side’s lack of principles, its lies, hypocrisy, unfairness, ruthlessness, and control of virtually every important institution. They’re evil totalitarians, what the hell do we expect? Their principle is absolute power and they’ll do whatever is necessary to acquire and keep it..."
‘Secession and liberty, not insurrection and revolution, are the goals.’
[Link]
[Link]
R.C.
Bill Gates, the World Health Organisation's (WHO) largest sponsor, said in spring 2020 that some countries are responsible for only a small proportion of reported infections and that his foundation's key priority is to help improve testing in those countries "to know their situation." The test agenda has been successful in Europe, as well as in the United States, where states are mass-testing their populations to keep a "pandemic" alive. The tests, which Gates sponsors and sends to developing countries, have already positively described milk, fruit juice and cola as covid. The same antigen tests are also used in USA. Despite sending them to millions to Africa, some countries are still resisting pressure and do not testing.
In Tanzania, for example, in May 2020, PCR tests evaluated covid positive papaya and goat, samples that President Magufuli had tagged with human names and tested because he doubted the effectiveness of the tests. After the testing affair, the president expelled dubious scientists from the country and therefore they have no covid there. They still record the same numbers as in May 2020 (21 deaths with covid and 509 cases of covid positivity). Tanzania has a population of 56 million and is currently, with its island of Zanzibar, the most popular tourist destination during the winter holiday season. It does not require tests and quarantine and has no conditions for entering the country or for Slovaks. Tanzania does not have a covid and it is not due to the fact that it does not occur in the area. Neighboring states e.g. Kenya has 99,000 cases and 1,728 deaths and Uganda 38,000 cases and 304 deaths. It depends on how the national governments got bribed by Bill Gates. We wrote about a few bribery scandals in an August article. In the 10.5 million Burundi, the deaths of the WHO team still record 2 deaths, in the 22-million Madagascar 267 deaths.
Nigeria, which has a population of 190 million, recorded 1,413 deaths, Uganda's 41 million deaths, 304 and Congo's 73 million deaths. There are countries in which no one died with the covid, e.g. Turkmenistan, Cambodia, Laos, Dominica. Thailand with a population of 68.8 million has 70 deaths, Vietnam with a population of 94.5 million with 35 deaths. People live completely normal, laugh and visit and children go to school. Thailand has 11,000 cases (ie 0.00016% of the population), Vietnam 1,500 (ie 0.0016% of the population), but small Slovakia obsessed with testing, led by I. Testovic, has 222,000 positive testers (4% of the population) and 3,400 covid "victim".
The argument that many millions of Asian countries do not have sufficient medical records does not stand up. They would probably notice hundreds dead on the sidewalk if they had them there. India also has weaker health care, although tests have revealed 10.5 million cases and 152,000 deaths, Bangladesh has half a million cases and 7,862 deaths. India has 0.8% of the population tested positive and Bangladesh 0.3%. The differences are due to the approach to testing. Where they don't test, they don't find covid. And they attribute their deaths to pneumonia, acute respiratory illness and influenza as in previous years. No one in USA & Europe wonders where the flu went?