Emile Ratelband, 69, wants to be recognised as a 49-year-old because he feels 20 years younger, but his application was refused by his local authority.
Comment: Obviously a human rights violation...
He argues that if transgender people are legally allowed to change sex, he should be allowed to give himself a new birth date because doctors told him he has the body of a 45-year-old.
Comment: Well, he's kind of right.
The entrepreneur and self-help guru, from the Netherlands, is suing his local authority after they refused to amend his age on official documents.
Mr Ratelband's case has now gone to a court in the city of Arnhmen in the eastern Dutch provice of Gelderland.
He was born on March 11, 1949, but says he feels at least 20 years younger and wants to change his birth date to March 11, 1969.
Mr Ratelband said: "I have done a check-up and what does it show? My biological age is 45 years.
"When I'm 69, I am limited. If I'm 49, then I can buy a new house, drive a different car. I can take up more work.
Comment: And if he wants to identify as a billionaire president of a medium-sized nation, he should be able to do that too. He's pretty limited identifying as a 69-year-old self-help guru. Why not go the whole hog?
"When I'm on Tinder and it say I'm 69, I don't get an answer. When I'm 49, with the face I have, I will be in a luxurious position. Transgenders can now have their gender changed on their birth certificate, and in the same spirit there should be room for an age change."
He claims he is discriminated against because of his age, and that he encounters problems in society on a daily basis.
Comment: It's hard to tell if he's joking. Sadly, it doesn't appear that he is.
He said companies are reluctant to hire someone the age of a pensioner as a consultant.
And he said his move would also be good news for the government as he would be renouncing his pension until he reaches retirement age again.
Comment: At least he's willing to take on the responsibilities associated with his new identity!
The judge said that he had some sympathy with Mr Ratelband, but the court said there would be practical problems in allowing people to change their birth date - as it would mean legally deleting part of their lives.
The judge asked Mr Ratelband about the status of his early years, from 1949 to 1969, if his official birth date was put back.
"For whom did your parents care in those years? Who was that little boy back then?" the judge asked.
The court is due to deliver a written ruling within four weeks.
Reader Comments
If a birth date is a data point
And that data point is a reference situated in a moment in time
And if time is an illusion
Then his birth date does not exist and therefore, neither does his age
Be a happy tinder trolling 49 year old jiggalo. (disclaimer: as a mid 40's man myself, this will not improve your chances at love . Try 29 instead)
he might as well have said he wants to be a firetruck
oh ya, being trans is not a choice
So might you.
"oh ya, being trans is not a choice."
Oh, ya. What next? Being pedophile is not a choice?
He says he's happy with the verdict because now he can appeal to a higher court.
Apparently to be continued...