OF THE
TIMES
If ignorance is truly bliss, then why do so many Americans need Prozac?
Birkelund refers. Red means new, blue means old. This is a newer star. It has been studied for over a thousand years. A colour change has been...
The ageing is wrong, but the details of catastrophe are substantially accurate. Cata Astrophe = falling star Dis Aster = falling star Lucifer was...
The Channel Tunnel, the one between England and France also went bankrupt. Someone dumped the shares onto suckers long before that, of course. So...
500,000 KIA in Ukraine, 35.000 genocided in Palestine .... Some would say that Biden's current term has been a bloodbath and, if reelected, the...
Big Oil, Big pHarma etc all lose if the population declines. Who exactly is behind this scheme? Or, is it just a warning? The intellectuals may...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
We are all so focused on capturing moments that we now have a collage of images from the past, including a vast database of selfies. Our favourite moments are lodged in the past.
Are we tethering ourselves to these imprints from the past and in so doing are we denying ourselves the hope of a future?
I wonder whether the number of images we record of significant moments may actually increase the density of the moment captured, such that the density of that moment is sufficient to anchor time, in the past.
I guess Mr. Hawking's has had one too many flu shots, cause he now sounds like an idiot.
A problem cannot be solved with the same mind that created it, and he wants this self destructive 'civilization' to expand to other planets?
It is not gonna be the weather that kills us, its the psychopath's stupid! (well ok maybe nuclear weather...)
"Hawking reiterated his desire for humanity to unite with the singular purpose of becoming a multi-planetary species"
Howabout instead uniting in the singular purpose of learning how not to be the most idiotic species in the universe.
Frankly I think the other more intelligent species are not about to let us leave this pen, not until we solve our egregious 'civilization' problems, and stop being self destructive imbecilic lemmings.
An unexpected sense of humour in HFL.