On Tuesday, a recurring theme on U.S. news broadcasts, such as Andrea Mitchell's MSNBC program, was that any lifting of economic sanctions against Iran will give it more money to engage in trouble-making in the Middle East with references to four nations -- Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen -- a central theme in Netanyahu's speech on March 3 to a joint session of the U.S. Congress.
Comment: If so, they would only be taking the US's lead...choosing to fund blatant, unchecked aggression over homeland public welfare. Fortunately, not everyone makes this choice.
To repeated standing ovations from U.S. senators and congressmen, Netanyahu declared: "In the Middle East, Iran now dominates four Arab capitals, Baghdad, Damascus, Beirut and Sanaa. And if Iran's aggression is left unchecked, more will surely follow. So, at a time when many hope that Iran will join the community of nations, Iran is busy gobbling up the nations. We must all stand together to stop Iran's march of conquest, subjugation and terror."
Netanyahu's reference to "Iran's aggression," which is now becoming a conventional-wisdom talking point in Official Washington, was curious since Iran has not invaded another country for centuries. In 1980, Saddam Hussein's Iraq -- at the urging of Saudi Arabia -- invaded Iran. But Iran has not invaded any of the four countries that Netanyahu cited.
One of Netanyahu's citations of Arab cities supposedly conquered by Iran was particularly strange: Baghdad, which is the capital of Iraq where the U.S. military invaded in 2003 to overthrow Saddam Hussein and his Sunni-dominated government, on Netanyahu's recommendation. In other words, Iraq was conquered not by Iranian "aggression" but by U.S. aggression with the support of Israel.
After the Iraq invasion, President George W. Bush installed a Shiite-dominated government which then developed friendly ties to Iran's Shiite government. So, whatever influence Iran has in Baghdad is the result of a U.S. invasion that Netanyahu personally encouraged.
Comment: Israeli "passive aggression?"
More recently, Iran has helped the embattled Iraqi government in its struggle against the murderous Islamic State militants who seized large swaths of Iraqi territory last summer. Indeed, Iraqi officials have credited Iran with playing a crucial role in blunting the Islamic State, the terrorists whom President Barack Obama has identified as one of the top security threats facing the United States.
Comment: ...unless you consider the origins of IS and who was involved in its creation and training... Mr. N. do we see your hand raised? Mr. O?
So, in the current Iraqi fight against the head-chopping Islamic State, Iran and the United States are on the same side. Yet, Netanyahu calls Iran's help "aggression" -- and American talking heads repeat that refrain.
Netanyahu also cited Damascus, where Iran has aided the Syrian government in its struggle against the Islamic State and Al-Qaeda's Nusra Front. That means that Iran is assisting the internationally recognized government of Syria hold off two major terrorist organizations. By contrast, Israel and Saudi Arabia have provided direct and indirect help at least to Nusra.
The Israeli prime minister also mentioned Beirut, Lebanon, and Sanaa, Yemen, but those were rather bizarre references, too, since Lebanon is governed by a multi-ethnic arrangement that includes a number of religious and political factions. Hezbollah is one and it has close ties to Iran, but it is stretching the truth to say that Iran "dominates" Beirut or Lebanon.
Similarly, in Sanaa, the Houthis, a Shiite-related sect, have taken control of Yemen's capital and have reportedly received some help from Iran, but the Houthis deny those reports and are clearly far from under Iranian control. The Houthis also have vowed to work with the Americans to carry on the fight against Yemen's Al-Qaeda affiliate, which has benefitted from a brutal Saudi bombing campaign against Houthi targets, an act of real aggression that has killed hundreds of civilians and provoked a humanitarian crisis.
Indeed, Iran and these various Shiite-linked movements have been among the most effective in battling Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State, while Israel's Saudi friends have been repeatedly linked to funding and supporting these Sunni terrorist organizations.
So, there is little truth and much exaggeration to Netanyahu's depiction of what is going on in the Middle East. Yet, the U.S. mainstream media mindlessly reprises Netanyahu's falsehood about Iran "gobbling up" nations.
Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq.




the most insane s.o.b. on the planet stands there spewing lie after lies in front of the bought-insane-fascist-traitors in so-called-congress and they applaud him and his genocide. does it get any fouler that that? all insane psychopaths and their credo is, genocide-is-fun and monetarily rewarding to our mafia! how great they can murder, torture, invade-occupy-rape the resources any country on the planet with absolutely no repercussions! a virtual get-out-of-jail-free pass.
what is it that compels anyone to give any credence to these monsters, these perps of crimes against humanity? why does anyone give a shit about what this trash has to say? do those applauding realize how beyond ridiculous they look? is everyone letting this turd threaten them? what, we're gonna nuke you all if you don't pretend we're not the true terrorists on planet earth? listen to us boviate endlessly! and why aren't they being disarmed?
meanwhile the peace activist government in iran, who hasn't invaded anyone in over 300 years, and hasn't used nukes to threaten or mass genocide any population, is harassed endlessly by these war criminals for simply existing! oh yeah, they want to control their money supply. good reason! our fascist-israeli-terrorist-occupiers are the only ones who have used nukes and the horror of it will be recorded! and has anyone looked at a map of where they've put a massive number of nuke plants? right on faults. if there is a power grid failure outage how will they all be cooled? they won't. extinction.
the insanity is incredulous-beyond-belief