© YouTube/Archdiocese of Detroit
Archbishop Allen Vigneron on Sunday said that Catholics who support marriage equality and try to receive Communion would "logically bring shame for a double-dealing that is not unlike perjury," according to the Detroit Free Press.
Vigneron's comments come after Sacred Heart Major Seminary canon law professor Edward Peters made similar remarks in a blog posting last month.
"Catholics who promote 'same-sex marriage' act contrary to Canon 209 § 1 and should not approach for holy Communion per Canon 916," Peters wrote. "Depending on the facts of the case, they also risk having holy Communion withheld from them under Canon 915, being rebuked under Canon 1339 § 2, and/or being sanctioned under Canon 1369 for gravely injuring good morals."
"The Catholic Church would regard any attempt by persons of the same sex to marry, regardless of their religious affiliation or lack thereof, as null," he insisted.
Peters, who was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI as a legal adviser to the Vatican in 2010, added that "special attention [was] being paid to the heightened responsibility" that politicians have "to protect the common good."
Father Thomas Reese, a senior fellow at the Woodstock Theological Center at Georgetown University, told the Free Press Peters' views were "in a minority among American canon lawyers."
"Most American bishops do not favor denying either politicians or voters Communion because of their positions on controversial issues," he explained.
Peters has previously said that House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm (D) should be denied Communion for supporting marriage equality or abortion rights for women.
But on Sunday, Vigneron insisted that the church wanted to help Catholics to "avoid this personal disaster" of effectively having to excommunicate themselves.
"For a Catholic to receive holy Communion and still deny the revelation Christ entrusted to the church is to try to say two contradictory things at once: 'I believe the church offers the saving truth of Jesus, and I reject what the church teaches,'" he remarked. "In effect, they would contradict themselves. This sort of behavior would result in publicly renouncing one's integrity and logically bring shame for a double-dealing that is not unlike perjury."
Isn't this the same policy 'recommendation' made by certain Republicans here in the States regarding so-called illegals, who should return themselves back where they came from, and of course many early 'Americans' have thought the same thing for a long time, that all the white people should just 'go home' to Europe.
Personally, I don't see any problem with this 'Catholic' position, as it is just one 'Christian' faction anyway, so all those that don't believe in their dogmas should just create/craft their own faction and have their own marriage ceremonies etc. I would suggest the assistance of someone with experience in contract law, as that is the basis of the American variation on the old hearth fire traditions of yesteryear, as complications might develop once the loss revenues are discovered, same as mainstream public schools once the charter system began getting financial support. In a money system, money changes everything, until it is nothing at least.