OF THE
TIMES
I've had enough of someone else's propaganda. I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.
Yuval and Klaus are characters playing a role. If you read Klaus's works you will see there's nothing there but a nonsense word salad. You're...
A tempest in a teapot. Who cares ? But hey, it's the NYP ...
Surely nanny states are not the way. But hey, here we are: Name a country that does not have this in some form or another.
'They Are The Dark; We Are the Light' The more we know, the closer we are to the end of tyranny by ELIZABETH NICKSON APR 28, 2024 [Link] . "This...
Both should be fired, but Jean-Pierre definitely. She is arrogant , ill-informed , and rude to reporters.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
First it states that 'People who rate themselves...'
Great let's start off the first line with an apparent mistake, as it later says that 'researchers' were the one's doing the 'rating' based on a questionnaire. So it's the researchers 'standard questionnaire' that could be the first victim for analysis, if that is even done these days anymore. The next victim could be these 'emotionally intelligent people', but then if we have a bad Q&A, we really cannot assess whether they are in fact 'emotionally intelligent' or not.
I won't mention the rather obvious fact that any 'good liar' should have no trouble fooling most people most of the time, as that is what they do, otherwise they wouldn't be any good at their chosen profession and would be called a 'bad liar', which nearly anyone can spot, thus the reason for their classification as 'bad liars'.
Perhaps Professor Porter is bad at his profession? Or is he just like his research subjects and suffering from the same problem of 'overconfidence'? Now if he's a psychopath himself, he might find this survey quite unnecessary unless necessary for further applications for research grants.
Or perhaps this has just been another test of the 'spot the psycho' science study? Do I win a prize or am I too 'overconfident'?