Welcome to Sott.net
Thu, 24 Jun 2021
The World for People who Think

Health & Wellness


At least twenty-three people die in Norway within days of receiving Pfizer coronavirus vaccine

covid vaccine shot
© AP Photo
A man receives a COVID-19 vaccine at Englewood Health in Englewood, New Jersey, U.S., Jan. 14, 2021.
Health officials in Norway say that 23 people died within days of receiving their first dose of Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine.

Thirteen of the 23 deaths, all nursing home patients, were a direct result of side effects from the shot, officials say, according to the New York Post.

"The reports suggest that common adverse reactions to mRNA vaccines, such as fever and nausea, may have contributed to a fatal outcome in some frail patients," Sigurd Hortemo, chief physician at the Norwegian Medicines Agency, said in a statement.

Comment: Isn't it funny how when elderly and sick patients die of Covid it's a horrific tragedy that requires draconian measures to prevent, but sick and elderly patients dying of vaccine side effects is 'not a concern'?

See also:


Stolen Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine data leaked; UPDATE: EMA says leaked data was 'manipulated'

vaccine vial
© Adobe
Data relating to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, which was stolen in December 2020 following a cyber attack of an unspecified nature against the European Medicines Agency (EMA), has been leaked on the internet.

BleepingComputer, the data dump is understood to include screenshots of emails, peer review information, and other documents including PDFs and PowerPoint presentations. The identity of the cyber criminals involved, and whether or not they are backed by any nation state-linked interests, is unknown at the time of writing.

In a statement, the Netherlands-based EMA said: "The ongoing investigation of the cyber attack on EMA revealed that some of the unlawfully accessed documents related to Covid-19 medicines and vaccines belonging to third parties have been leaked on the internet. Necessary action is being taken by the law enforcement authorities.

Comment: UPDATE from RT:
'Manipulated' internal vaccine evaluation emails leaked following December cyberattack - EU drug regulator
15 Jan, 2021 15:24

Emails related to the vaccine evaluation process were leaked following a December hacking attack on the EMA, the European drug regulator, the agency said, adding that data was "manipulated" to undermine trust in the vaccines.

A batch of "unlawfully accessed" documents obtained by hackers that has since been posted online includes "internal/confidential email correspondence dating from November, relating to evaluation processes for COVID-19 vaccines," the European Medicines Agency (EMA) said in a statement on Friday as part of its ongoing investigation into the December incident.

The watchdog specifically stated that some emails posted by the hackers were "manipulated by the perpetrators prior to publication in a way which could undermine trust in vaccines." It did not provide any further details as to which specific parts were changed and in which way.

Instead, it repeatedly said in its statement that the high speed of the vaccine authorization in no way affected the "high-quality standards" of their scientific assessment, and that "the evidence shows convincingly that the benefits of vaccination are greater than any risks of the vaccine."

The EMA reported in early December that it was targeted in a cyberattack and that an investigation was launched into the incident. At the time, it did not provide any details.

Earlier this week, media reports indicated that a trove of data allegedly stolen by the attackers from the EMA surfaced on hacker forums on December 30. According to the media, the leaked data includes email screenshots, EMA peer review comments, along with some documents and PowerPoint presentations. Nothing has been reported on the exact content of the data so far.

Pfizer and BioNTech said in a joint statement that data related to the vaccine jointly developed produced by the two companies "had been accessed" during the breach. The EMA recommended the Pfizer and BioNTech shot for authorization in late December.


Norway links 13 deaths to Pfizer vaccine's side effects

© Pfizer
Those reported to have died were all elderly and frail. The Norwegian Medicines Agency urged, therefore, that it should be reconsidered whether to vaccinate the very weakest, despite claiming that the vaccine has "very little risk".

Four days before New Year's Eve, inoculation with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine began in Norway. Since Svein Andersen (67) at the Ellingsrudhjemmet elderly home became the first Norwegian to take the jab, over 33,000 Norwegians have received the vaccine in the subsequent weeks.

It was announced in advance that the vaccine may cause side effects of varying severity, and now the Norwegian Medicines Agency has mapped which ones have occurred in the country. A total of 29 side effects were reported, yet with an alarming share of deaths.

"Of these, there are 13 deaths, nine serious side effects and seven less serious side effects", medical director of the Norwegian Medicines Agency Steinar Madsen told national broadcaster NRK.

A total of 23 deaths have been reported by the Norwegian Medicines Agency in connection with the vaccination. However, only 13 of these have been assessed so far.

Comment: See also:


27-year-old mother suffers seizures, is hospitalized after taking COVID vaccine

Covid-19 vaccine
© Shutterstock.com
The woman was accompanied by her husband, who also received a vaccination. Kaiser officials said that despite the tragedy, he still intends to receive his second dose of the vaccine in a few weeks.
A 27-year-old personal support worker suffered a severe allergic reaction including fainting, seizures, and hospitalization, when she received the abortion-tainted Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

Deborah Tilli, a mother of two girls, had looked forward to receiving the vaccination. She said:
"I wasn't scared, I was excited. I was like, 'I'm going to be one of the first health-care workers in the city to get the vaccine,'" CBC reports.
As is routine, she filled out the consent forms, then noticed the nurse who was looking over her file exhibited a hesitation or lack of confidence in how to proceed with her case. Tilli said:
"I do have a severe allergy to bumblebees, and the nurse went over that with me and even questioned me about it, but ... it seemed like she really didn't know what she was doing"

Comment: The new Covid-19 vaccines are proving to be probably more dangerous than the virus itself.

Eye 2

Yellow mealworm 'safe' for humans to eat, says EU food safety agency

© François Lenoir/Reuters
Move paves way for high-protein maggot-like insect to be approved for consumption across Europe
Yellow mealworm finger foods, smoothies, biscuits, pasta and burgers could soon be mass produced across Europe after the insect became the first to be found safe for human consumption by the EU food safety agency.

The delicacies may not be advisable for everyone, however. Those with prawn and dustmite allergies are likely to suffer a reaction to the Tenebrio molitor larvae, whether eaten in powder form as part of a recipe or as a crunchy snack, perhaps dipped in chocolate.

The conclusion of scientists at the EU food safety agency, following an application by the French insect-for-food production company, Agronutris, is expected to lead to EU-wide approval within months of yellow mealworm as a product fit for supermarket shelves and kitchen pantries across the continent.

Comment: There's a reason that Europeans don't eat insects. Even during times of war, when food was strictly rationed, eating maggots would have been seen as a last resort. It is true, however, that during times of food scarcity people did eat less than ideal sources of protein, knowing that, otherwise, they would starve; it's also true that their health suffered for it.

It's also notable that this sinister push for the public to eat insects and frankenfoods comes at a time when throughout the Western world - especially so now with the endless, rolling lockdowns - soaring numbers of families are forced to visit foodbanks to survive. What are the chances that these 'novel' sources of protein will find their way into the food chain of the poor? You can be sure that the well off will not be chowing down on maggot sausages:

SOTT Logo Radio

Objective:Health - Covid 1984: WHO Changes Definition of Herd Immunity

O:H header
Our reality continues to get more Orwellian by the day. A few months back the WHO quietly changed the definition of the term 'herd immunity' on their website from the definition that's been with us for about a century to a new one that indicates herd immunity is only possible through vaccination.

By changing the definition they are creating the perception that vaccination is the only way to deal with diseases of any kind, rather than the way life has dealt with them from the beginning of immune systems.

On top of this, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization has said "Herd immunity is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached," but, he explained, it is achieved by protecting people from the virus, "not by exposing them to it".

Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we talk about herd immunity, then and now and the changing of language as a means of controlling discourse and populations.

For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:

♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@objectivehealth:f

And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here:

Running Time: 00:26:14

Download: MP3 — 24 MB


How COVID-19 is changing the future of vaccines

the future of vaccines
In his December 24, 2020, video report,1,2 "The Future of Vaccines," investigative journalist James Corbett reviews how the novel COVID-19 vaccine is paving the way for nonconsensual medical experimentation on the general public.

As noted by Corbett, if the international medical establishment get their way, nothing will get back to "normal" until world health officials have definitively determined there is an effective COVID vaccine in place.

Even then, however, things may not go back to the normal we're accustomed to or expect. Since the beginning of the pandemic, world leaders have warned that social distancing, mask wearing, travel restrictions and other measures will become part of our "new normal."3


Lockdown harms are at least 10 times greater than benefits - Canadian specialist in pediatric infectious diseases

closed sign
Dr. Ari Joffe is a specialist in pediatric infectious diseases at the Stollery Children's Hospital in Edmonton and a Clinical Professor in the Department of Pediatrics at University of Alberta. He has written a paper titled COVID-19: Rethinking the Lockdown Groupthink that finds the harms of lockdowns are 10 times greater than their benefits.
The below Q&A is an exchange between Joffe and Anthony Furey.

You were a strong proponent of lockdowns initially but have since changed your mind. Why is that?

There are a few reasons why I supported lockdowns at first.

First, initial data falsely suggested that the infection fatality rate was up to 2-3%, that over 80% of the population would be infected, and modelling suggested repeated lockdowns would be necessary. But emerging data showed that the median infection fatality rate is 0.23%, that the median infection fatality rate in people under 70 years old is 0.05%, and that the high-risk group is older people especially those with severe co-morbidities. In addition, it is likely that in most situations only 20-40% of the population would be infected before ongoing transmission is limited (i.e., herd-immunity).

Comment: It's no longer just the deadly fall out of the endless lockdowns we have to contend with: COVID Mass Vaccination Experiment: Prepare For The Worst With This Health Protocol

And check out SOTT radio's:


British scientists developing world's first Covid-19 vaccine smart patch

Vaccine Patch
© Swansea University
Scientists from Swansea University in Wales are striving to develop the first coronavirus vaccine 'smart patch'.

The patch will use microneedles to both administer the coronavirus vaccine and monitor its efficacy for the patient by tracking the body's immune response.

Comment: The PTB are determined to vaccinate the global population. Knowing their behavior and how they act we can pretty much assume their real intentions, and it has nothing to do with our health and wellbeing. The artificial crisis created by the hoax pandemic is being used as a political tool to create panic and fear among desperate people so they will accept the dangerous Covid-19 vaccines in much larger numbers. And it's all for our own good...


'Vaccines' are genetic-engineered drugs

© carolina.com

Two Amazing Admissions from Pfizer and Moderna

I want to wish everyone a Happy New Year. Those words seem almost absurd to say right now, given all that is happening in the world, but hopefully we all continue to experience wonders and joy. We are living in the midst of world-shaking, cosmic events, the likes of which most people never get to experience. We are finding new friends, finding our courage, and many of us are finding our voices as we speak out against the treachery we see all around us. Many of us are finding our way back to divine inspiration and new meaning in our lives. We all have to admit and accept that we simply can't and don't know where this all will lead, but that has always been the case. Now, more than ever, it's time to enjoy the ride.

Today I want to address two things that are commonly referred to as "conspiracy theories" in the mainstream narrative. The first is that some of us are saying researchers have never isolated the "corona virus" nor proven that it exists. Proving the existence of the virus is, obviously, the first step in showing that it could cause a disease called COVID-19. The corollary to this claim is that any so-called COVID vaccine can't possibly be based on something that is actually from a virus, as the virus has never been found.

An email correspondence was sent to me this morning from a woman who asked Pfizer to describe what the company is using as the template for its new vaccine. Here is what the customer-service person said to her in writing: