© Shrew Views
He might not be responsible in the least, but
most people are already convinced he's deeply involved. They view him as a mere puppet of the agenda — and even if that's true, and the agenda wins its war against humanity, it won't be his doing alone. Yet the masses will almost certainly hold him fully accountable.
I have written so many articles that appear to be pro-Trump. They really aren't. I honestly don't trust the guy, and I feel he has been on thin ice since he took office. I understand that every "good" thing he has done — such as cracking down on transgender policies in schools and sports, getting a handle on illegal immigration, brokering historic peace deals around the world (from Gaza to other global hotspots), and setting up a savings account for American children — could all
be a distraction. He certainly has done a bunch of things that are downright dicey, but even that stuff, you could, if you chose to, put a positive spin on.
Still, he could easily slip from whatever grace Trump supporters have given him. For me, that has not yet happened. I feel there are mongooses in the hen house, and we've got to do something about them. Bringing in a big fat cobra will eat the mongooses, but then once the mongooses are gone, you've got a big fat cobra sitting around with nothing to do. That's one way to look at it.
But yet another way is to see Trump as a very conscious puppet placement by the agenda. Considering the agenda seems to be infallible, this is a distinct and very real possibility. But is the agenda infallible? Does it have any weak links that would allow for a maverick president to get voted into office? A man with a different agenda, one who is actually in favour of human beings? A cobra snake ready to eat the mongooses in the hen house and leave the hens alone?
Comment: Previously: 'Color revolutions are turning into internet revolutions': Russian experts on Nepal's Generation Z uprising