As I'm writing this, the October 30 conversation between Jordan Peterson and Helen Lewis accumulated over six million views on British GQ's YouTube channel.
Similar to a central point of contention that emerged in Jordan Peterson and Cathy Newman's conversation that went viral roughly a year ago (and which accumulated 14 million views on Channel 4 News' YouTube channel), Peterson and Lewis disagreed over whether asymmetries between men and women in terms of both (1) their representation in the workplace and (2) their earnings are markers of oppressive, discriminatory structures entrenched in our society that limit women's opportunities for vocational success, subordinating women as a class of people.
In both of these interviews, Peterson's interlocutors held that asymmetries are ipso facto the result of discrimination.
Peterson, alternatively, argued that asymmetries, such as the observed wage gap between men and women and different concentrations of men and women in certain professions,
often arise from the confluence of various factors which have nothing to do with the albatross of discrimination.
Comment: See also: