
© www.theeventchronicle.comSyria appeals to UN after French & US airstrikes kill hundreds of civilians. Did they think the city was empty?
Western coalition forces knew they were attacking an area inhabited by civilians and yet they carried out a bombing.
How can 30 airstrikes be a mistake? How can they all be a mistake, political commentator Marwa Osman asked RT. The Syrian Foreign Ministry has written to the UN blaming
US and French warplanes for the deaths of more than 100 civilians near the city of Manbij.
The alleged French act of aggression claimed the lives of
more than 120 civilians, most of them children, women and elderly.
The fate of scores of other civilians still under the debris is unknown. The letter also mentioned the French air strikes came a day after
US warplanes conducted a bombing raid, which Damascus claims killed 20 other civilians.
RT: In January, the US-led coalition was reportedly (as claimed by CNN)
prepared for up to 50 civilian deaths when it decided to target an ISIS cash vault. Can the risk of so-called collateral damage be justified for the greater good?
Marwa Osman: They blatantly call it 'collateral damage' when it is lives of the Syrian people which are being lost here. No one is talking about this, about the grave lives of the people who are living in Syria because of this coalition, because of the support this coalition has been giving to all sorts of groups. We already saw that the same thing in the French bombing, we saw the same thing that happened in a school in
Iraq's Nineveh massacre of 36 children after ISIS claimed responsibility for the Paris attacks. And now after the Nice attack, we see this in Syria. This is beyond unacceptable, this is beyond a massacre. They knew that this is an inhabited area by civilians and yet they did it. How can 30 airstrikes be a mistake? How can they all be a mistake? This is unacceptable...
Comment: Vengeance has no place in war. Who is going to make France and the US accountable? Surely not the UN.