Puppet MastersS


Snakes in Suits

Reality Check: Ted Cruz says Middle East was better off before War On Terror

War on Terror
© American Herald Tribune
"The Middle East was better off with Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi in power."

Those words are from Republican presidential candidate and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.

But is he right? What do the numbers show in the years since the Iraq war?

Bandaid

Bitter in Aleppo defeat, US and EU seek to further demonize Russia

As Russian forces help liberate the Syrian city of Aleppo this week from a four-year terrorist siege, Washington and Europe step up threats of cyber war and economic aggression with sanctions. That's no coincidence. It is the response of accomplices bitter in defeat.

Syria war
Perverse isn't it? Instead of celebrating with the people of Syria over the liberation of Aleppo from terrorists; instead of sending massive humanitarian aid to the tens of thousands of civilians freed after being held under siege for four years by terrorist gangs; instead of commending Russia for its decisive role in restoring peace to Syria's second biggest city, the US and European Union turn reality on its head and further demonize Moscow.

The perverse behavior by Washington and its European satraps is simply a case of sour grapes. Very sour grapes.

They have been proven spectacularly wrong about Syria. The liberation of Aleppo this week exposes the Western governments and media in their unrelenting falsehoods and systematic complicity in the Syrian war. This was never a pro-democracy uprising. It was a Western-backed criminal regime-change operation that was unleashed in March 2011, and which is now staring at ignominious defeat.

The blood of up to half a million people and many more maimed is on the hands of American and European governments.

Red Flag

Ron Paul: CIA meddled hundreds of elections, fake news, Russia blaming, Middle East

RonPaul
© Russia Insider
US government "propagandists" push for a foreign policy of "intervening around the world," former presidential candidate and founder of the Institute for Peace and Prosperity, Dr. Ron Paul, told RT in a wide-ranging interview that also touched on Syria.

Following reports that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton blamed Russian President Vladimir Putin for personally directing a cyberattack that cost her the 2016 presidential election, Dr. Paul shrugged off the allegations as a "fiasco" in an interview with RT's Neil Harvey. "I think they're just agitating, because they lost the election. They're throwing out accusations and they have no proof," the former Republican congressman for Texas said.

"The same people who are making all these charges, they didn't seem to be worried a bit by the secretary of state having a private server," Paul said, "which made it much easier for Russia or anybody else to know what was going on."

Paul, a libertarian advocate of a foreign policy of non-intervention, went on to explain that ideally, the US should not have to worry about any other country having an incentive to interfere in US elections. The root of the problem, Paul believes, is in the US government doing the exact thing it now accuses Russia of doing.

"The American people should be worried about the influence of our CIA in other people's elections, I mean probably hundreds. It's constant," he said, even going as far as to allude to "domestic assassinations" the CIA has allegedly taken part in.


Comment: Paul, having been in the American political arena, experiencing front and center the surface and covert workings of the US government, has put words to what many suspect the great American democracy has become - a bottleneck where a shadow government pulls the strings and the masses are manipulated as the means to its end.


Attention

George Soros is funding Facebook's 'third-party fact checking' organization targeting 'fake news'

George Soros
Behind almost every liberal crusade of the past several decades, from the blocking of voter ID laws to the Syrian refugee crisis, there has been one man quietly pulling the puppet strings from the background: George Soros. So imagine our complete shock when we discovered Soros to be the financing source behind Facebook's "third-party fact checking" organization retained to flag, and thus eliminate, "fake news."

Just yesterday, Facebook posted the following press release to their website detailing their plans to use a "third-party fact checking organization," known as The Poynter Institute, to flag "fake news." The role of the "fact checkers" will be to review news stories and flag anything they deem to be "fake" so that it can be deprioritized on Facebook's news feed.

Comment: More on Facebook's antics:


Arrow Up

'Reagan would roll over in his grave' at GOP support of Putin, says Obama

Obama
© Carlos Barria / Reuters U.S. President Barack Obama participates in his last news conference of the year at the White House before leaving for his annual Hawaiian Christmas holiday in Washington, U.S., December 16, 2016.
In his final 2016 news conference, President Barack Obama said a recent poll showing more than one-third of Republicans holding a "favorable" view of Russian President Vladimir Putin would make ex-president Ronald Reagan "roll over in his grave."

Friday's press conference, one of the last of the Obama administration, was dominated by the allegations that Russia interfered in the US election, but Putin in particular was the focus of much of Obama's remarks and reporters' questions.

Comment: See also:


Pirates

Why did Palmyra Fall? Military insider tells all, calls on anti-ISIS coalition to learn 'bitter lesson'

Translated by J. Arnoldski

A military source has told Russian Spring of some of the details of the battle for Palmyra in an exclusive interview.

Did intelligence know of the concentration of militants near Palmyra? Did they warn the Syrian command beforehand?

The information which the Ministry of Defense of Russia reliably possessed was that ISIS militants were coming from Iraq to Syria having left coalition-taken Mosul. Corresponding concerns were repeatedly expressed to the media during briefings by representatives of the Russian General Staff and foreign ministry.

Palmyra
© RusVesna
As for the preparation of a large-scale offensive on Palmyra in those precise days, of course, the ministry of defense, despite having limited intelligence capabilities in the remote theater of combat operations, possessed information on an impending attack. Naturally, this was passed on to Syrian colleagues. The question was the exact date when the militants would be ready to attack Palmyra, the scope, and their chosen method of offensive operations. And here the Syrians' tactical intelligence was supposed to work, but didn't...

It must be understood that the capabilities of Russian intelligence in Syria are limited. Our advantage over the militants in aerospace reconnaissance is undeniable. But when it comes to work "on the ground", due to objective reasons Russian specialists don't have sufficient capabilities and, as a rule, tend to rely on information extracted by Syrian intelligence.

Comment: "The main circumstance that allowed the terrorists to take Palmyra was their almost unhindered exit from Iraqi Mosul". Remember this?: And this movement from ISIS comes as Aleppo was finally being liberated. You would almost think that someone is coordinating the efforts of the different factions of headchoppers!


Binoculars

Enjoy it while you can: Neocons in panic and agony over Trump, Aleppo

neocons
The crazies in the basement.
There are clear signs that the Neocons running the AngloZionist Empire and its "deep state" are in a state of near panic and their actions are indicating that they are truly terrified.

The home front

On the home front, the Neocons have resorted to every possible dirty trick on the book to try to prevent Donald Trump from ever getting into the White House: they have
  • organized riots and demonstrations (some paid by Soros money)
  • encouraged the supporters of Hillary to reject the outcome of the elections ("not my President")
  • tried to threaten the Electors and make them either cast a vote for Hillary or not vote at all
  • tried to convince Congress to refuse the decision of the Electoral College and
  • they are now trying to get the elections annulled on the suspicion that the (apparently almighty) Russian hackers have compromised the election outcome (apparently even in states where paper ballots were used) and stolen it in favor of Trump.
That is truly an amazing development, especially considering how Hillary attacked Trump for not promising to recognize the outcome of the elections. She specifically said that Trump's lack of guarantees to recognize the outcome would threaten the very basis of the stability of the US political system and now she, and her supporters, are doing everything in their power to do just that, to throw the entire electoral process into a major crisis with no clear path towards resolution. Some say that the Democrats are risking a civil war. Considering that several key Republican Congressmen have said they do support the notion of an investigation into the "Russian hackers" fairytale, I submit that the Republicans are doing exactly the same thing, that this is not a Democrat vs Republican issue, but a "deep state vs The People of the USA" issue.

Info

FBI confirms meet with Poroshenko accuser Onyshchenko: No further talks planned

Oleksandr Onyshchenko
Oleksandr Onyshchenko
The U.S. Justice Department has cut ties with a fugitive Ukrainian member of parliament who said he had turned over damning evidence proving the corruption of Ukraine's president, a spokesman told RFE/RL on December 16.

The disclosure confirms for the first time that the department had held talks with the lawmaker.

Oleksandr Onyshchenko, the runaway lawmaker, said on December 1 that he had handed FBI agents audio recordings he made of Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and members of his inner circle discussing schemes to steal money from state and private companies and buy votes in parliament -- charges the president's administration vehemently denies.


Comment: More on Onyshchenko:


Question

Too nice? Assad's deals to evacuate and pardon terrorists are uncommonly humane, but will they harm Syria in the long run?

Syria's President Bashar al-Assad
© SANA / ReutersSyria's President Bashar al-Assad
Contrary to Western fake news, Assad's approach towards terrorists is deeply humane, some would say overly humane. Here is what we know and what must be answered.

Images of green bus convoys leaving Aleppo have provoked mixed reactions across the world. The coaches are filled with the surrendered terrorists who had occupied parts of East Aleppo prior to its liberation by the Syrian Arab Army.

Far from the fake massacres reported in the Western mainstream media, President Assad and his Russian partners are handling the situation in an utterly humane fashion, perhaps too humane. Assad's rationale is that in order for Syria to once again be a peaceful and united country, as it was prior to 2011 when Western provocations triggered the current crisis, there needn't be any Nuremberg style trials for the terrorists who continue to plague the country.

Assad has offered amnesty to any Syrians participating in terrorist activities in return for their pledge to lay down arms and permanently return to civilian life or join the fight against terrorism. He is also happy for the larger bulk of foreign fighters to peacefully leave the country, with many suggesting that Turkey, knowing that her plans for regime change in Damascus have failed, will cooperate in this.

Comment: Assad's policy is remarkable, and much more humane than any American policy, ironically. But in Western eyes, he's still an evil dictator. His approach echoes that of Julius Caesar, who considered clemency a new method of ruling and conquering. Like Assad, Caesar was a populist, supported and loved by the vast number of Romans. But a clique of psychopathic oligarchs assassinated him. Both Assad's and Caesar's clemency is understandable, and commendable, given the common practices back then and today. But good men are not often rewarded in this world.


Newspaper

Flashback Best of the Web: Miserable failure: Western media are lying about Syria

syrian rebels
© AFP/GettyNew recruits trained to fight alongside 'opposition' in Aleppo, Syria.
Coverage of the Syrian war will be remembered as one of the most shameful episodes in the history of the American press. Reporting about carnage in the ancient city of Aleppo is the latest reason why.

For three years, violent militants have run Aleppo. Their rule began with a wave of repression. They posted notices warning residents: "Don't send your children to school. If you do, we will get the backpack and you will get the coffin." Then they destroyed factories, hoping that unemployed workers would have no recourse other than to become fighters. They trucked looted machinery to Turkey and sold it.

This month, people in Aleppo have finally seen glimmers of hope. The Syrian army and its allies have been pushing militants out of the city. Last week they reclaimed the main power plant. Regular electricity may soon be restored. The militants' hold on the city could be ending.