Puppet MastersS


Info

Patrick Cockburn: Saying terrorism has "nothing to do with Islam" is pious and inaccurate - Wahhabism is radical religion

Salman Abedi
Alleged Manchester bomber, Salman Abedi
In the wake of the massacre in Manchester, people rightly warn against blaming the entire Muslim community in Britain and the world. Certainly one of the aims of those who carry out such atrocities is to provoke the communal punishment of all Muslims, thereby alienating a portion of them who will then become open to recruitment by Isis and al-Qaeda clones.

This approach of not blaming Muslims in general but targeting "radicalisation" or simply "evil" may appear sensible and moderate, but in practice it makes the motivation of the killers in Manchester or the Bataclan theatre in Paris in 2015 appear vaguer and less identifiable than it really is. Such generalities have the unfortunate effect of preventing people pointing an accusing finger at the variant of Islam which certainly is responsible for preparing the soil for the beliefs and actions likely to have inspired the suicide bomber Salman Abedi.

The ultimate inspiration for such people is Wahhabism, the puritanical, fanatical and regressive type of Islam dominant in Saudi Arabia, whose ideology is close to that of al-Qaeda and Isis. This is an exclusive creed, intolerant of all who disagree with it such as secular liberals, members of other Muslim communities such as the Shia or women resisting their chattel-like status.

Comment: As usual, both sides of the debate are wrong. Blaming Islam per se is not accurate. Giving Islam a free pass isn't accurate, either. The problem is the extreme, pathological, Wahhabi, salafi-jihadist ideology. In terms of ponerology, it is a schizoidal, pathocratic ideology that acts as a trojan horse for psychopathy. For all the details of how that works, check out Political Ponerology.


Question

No power, no problem: Ukraine avoids an electricity crisis by sabotaging its coal industry

ukraine
The de-electrification division
No coal, no power - no problem. This could be the new motto of new Ukraine.

Months ago Ukraine declared an end to coal imports from Donbass utterly gutting its electricity generation - but avoided an electricity crisis, because the ban also wreaked havoc on its many steel makers.

You can't have a power crisis, if you don't have power consumers. Brilliant.

It all started this late January this year when Ukrainian right-wing nationalists took over railways coming out of rebel-held Donbass to stop shipments of coal Kiev was purchasing from rebel territories.

Rather than assert its authority, the government instead pleaded with the nationalists to please vacate the barricades, explaining that without the anthracite coal from the east its thermal power plants would have to shut down.

Wall Street

Can't stop now: European Central Bank stimulus to remain intact despite improving growth

Euro logo
© AFP 2017/ Daniel Roland
Even though the Eurozone's economic growth has accelerated, the subdued inflation and regional growth discrepancies prevent the European Central Bank from removing its accommodative policies, stirring risks of overheating in the bloc's best-performing economies.

Kristian Rouz - Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank (ECB), said the unconventional monetary policies are still necessary to support the pace of economic expansion in the Eurozone, as the regulator awaits new evidence of macroeconomic stability.

The gradual removal of the negative interest rate policy (NIRP) on bank deposits and zero base interest rates, along with ECB asset purchases, would require a higher inflation and a more balanced growth across the 19-nation bloc.


Comment: The ECB can't pull back on the stimulus: Will the crazy global debt bubble ever end? It can't or else


Info

'We told each other everything': Highlights from Macron's first meeting with Putin

Putin and Macron press conference
Just a few days after the young French president made headlines for his white-knuckled, "not innocent" handshake with Donald Trump, Russian president Vladimir Putin was prepared for his first meeting with Emanuel Macron, with the result captured on the following clip.


What followed was talks in private between the two leaders in Versailles that lasted for almost three hours during which the two leaders discussed a number of topics ranging from bilateral relations to the situations in Syria, Ukraine, Libya and the Korean Peninsula, and culminated with a press conference in which Macron said the "Franco-Russian friendship" was at heart of his meeting with Putin and called for improved ties with Russia but warned he would hold tough positions on sanctions and the civil war in Syria.

"I want us to win the fight against terrorists in Syria and build together lasting political stability. We have laid the ground for that work together today." Macron said. "I believe we've had an extremely frank and direct exchange. We have told each other everything."

Comment: Commentary from Alexander Mercouris of The Duran:
Apparently there were agreements on setting up some sort of anti terrorist liaison centre and something which will be called the Russian-French Trianon Dialogue civil forum. These are the sort of things leaders agree when they have nothing substantive to talk about, and nothing else to show.

Macron's threats are empty. The question of whether sanctions against Russia are ever increased will be made in Washington and Berlin, not in Paris, and if the US or the Germans ever decide to lift the sanctions France will have no option but to agree regardless of what happens in Ukraine. The events of August 2013, when President Obama called of a military strike on Syria following the Ghouta chemical attack, leaving France's then President Hollande high and dry, shows that France is in no position to set 'red lines' or make threats independently of the US in Syria.

Whether the French public is impressed by all this grandiose talk - as if the France of today were the France of Louis XIV or Napoleon, not the diminished power it actually is - is hard to say. Macron anyway undermined whatever impression of French grandeur he wanted to make by saying that he would "report" about the meeting to Angela Merkel, showing where the real power in Europe lies.

Certainly Putin won't have been impressed. On the contrary, if Macron spoke to him like this in private - and all the indications are that he did - Putin will have decided that there is little to be gained from seeking a dialogue with the new French President, who it turns out is every bit as hostile to Russia as he appears to be.

This begs the question of why Macron decided to meet with Putin at all. The ostensible purpose of the meeting was to commemorate Peter the Great's visit to France in 1717. However there was no indication until a few weeks ago that Putin was planning to attend this commemoration, so presumably the suggestion for the visit, and the proposal to convert it into a summit, came from Macron. The Kremlin's brief statement confirming Putin's meeting with Macron notably confirms that the meeting happened at the invitation of Macron.

Possibly Macron overestimates his ability to impress Putin. As a young man who has come very far and very fast he might be over-confident about his diplomatic abilities, and might think that by 'setting Putin straight' in a one-to-one meeting he might achieve some sort of breakthrough in relations between France and Russia. If so then before long he will discover otherwise, and if he is wise he will come to realise that it is not in his own or in France's interests for him to continue to overplay his hand in this way.

As for Putin, the meeting will have enabled him to get a measure of the new French President. It is unlikely he was especially impressed by what he saw and heard.



Propaganda

Macron accuses RT and Sputnik of 'behaving like deceitful propaganda' right in front of Putin

Putin and Macron press conference
Newly-elected French President Emmanuel Macron explained his team's decision to deny RT and Sputnik, both Moscow-based news outlets, accreditation during his campaign, by labeling the media outlets as "propaganda."

"They didn't act like the media, like journalists. They behaved like deceitful propaganda," Macron told RT France head Xenia Fedorova during a joint press conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Versailles.

"I have always had an exemplary relationship with foreign journalists, but they have to be real journalists," explained Macron, who defeated Marine Le Pen in the second round of the election, earlier this month. "All foreign journalists, including Russian journalists, had access to my campaign."

Snakes in Suits

DHS chief says be very afraid: If you knew what I knew about terror, you'd 'never leave the house'

John Kelly
Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly on Friday said the terror threat is worse than most realize, saying some people would "never leave the house" if they knew the truth.

"I was telling [Fox host] Steve [Doocy] on the way in here, if he knew what I knew about terrorism, he'd never leave the house in the morning," Kelly said on "Fox & Friends."

He noted there were four major terror attacks in the last week — in England, Egypt, the Philippines and Indonesia — "by generally the same groups."

"It's everywhere. It's constant. It's nonstop. The good news for us in America is we have amazing people protecting us every day. But it can happen here almost anytime."

Snakes in Suits

Europe may finally rethink the cost of NATO

Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump traveled to Brussels
© White House photoPresident Donald J. Trump and First Lady Melania Trump traveled to Brussels, Belgium on Wednesday evening for their fourth stop on their trip abroad. President Trump met with leaders from around the world before the NATO Summit in Brussels.
President Donald Trump's politically incorrect behavior at the gathering of NATO leaders in Brussels on Thursday could, in its own circuitous way, spotlight an existential threat to the alliance. Yes, that threat is Russia, but not in the customary sense in which Westerners have been taught to fear the Russian bear. It is a Russia too clever to rise to the bait - a Russia patient enough to wait for the Brussels bureaucrats and generals to fall of their own weight, pushed by financial exigencies in many NATO countries.

At that point it will become possible to see through the West's alarmist propaganda. It will also become more difficult to stoke artificial fears that Russia, for reasons known only to NATO war planners and neoconservative pundits, will attack NATO. As long as Russian hardliners do not push President Vladimir Putin aside, Moscow will continue to reject its assigned role as bête noire.

Eye 1

Idiot McCain says Vladimir Putin is bigger threat than Islamic State

The former presidential candidate visited Parliament during Question Time on Monday
© ABC News: Marco CatalanoThe former presidential candidate visited Parliament during Question Time on Monday
Russian President Vladimir Putin is a bigger threat to world security than the Islamic State group, US senator John McCain has told the ABC.

The Republican also admitted in an exclusive interview with 7.30 that President Donald Trump sometimes made him "nervous".

During a visit to Canberra, Senator McCain said Mr Putin was the "premier and most important threat, more so than ISIS".
"I think ISIS can do terrible things. But it's the Russians who tried to destroy the fundamental of democracy and that is to change the outcome of an American election," he said.

Gear

Busy Russians: Mediterranean beach resort claims Russia plans to interfere in upcoming elections

Malta
Malta's PM insists he has information that Russia intends to meddle in its oncoming parliamentary elections.

Malta is an island between Tunisia and Sicily which "stretches" over 316 square kilometres.

Russia stretches over 17 million square kilometres - each with its own problems.

I'd be surprised if Russians can find Malta on a map, much less have the energy to vie for influence in its apartment council.

MIB

A joke right? Home Secretary vows MI5 intelligence to investigate itself after Manchester attack

British soldier and police
© Tolga Akmen / Global Look Press
MI5 has launched a probe into its own failure to flag the threat posed by the Manchester suicide bomber, Home Secretary Amber Rudd said.

In an interview with Sky News, Rudd said the self-probe by the intelligence agency is "the right first step" in learning the lessons from last week's concert bombing.

"There is a lot of information coming out at the moment about what happened, how this occurred, what people might or might not have known. And I think it is right that the MI5 takes a look to find out what the facts are," she said.

Comment: This is just a bunch of BS from Rudd. MI5 probably knew this attack would occur to reinforce the need for total surveillance of the population: 'Remember why you need us': Guardian launches fearmongering exclusive for MI5