Puppet MastersS


Laptop

FBI: Awan's wife returning from Pakistan - finalizing immunity deals with DOJ in exchange for testimony on members of Congress

wasserman shultz awan
© Facebook / ReutersImran Awan (L), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (R)
The legal teams for Imran Awan and Hina Alvi are close to finalizing immunity deals with the Justice Department that could spare them jail time in exchange for testimony against sitting members of Congress, federal law enforcement sources said.

FBI sources familiar with the case said late Friday that Imran Awan's legal counsel was "deep in the process" of structuring an immunity deal for himself and his wife with Justice Department lawyers. The deal would allow the couple to freely testify against any or all Democratic lawmakers they worked for as IT specialists, including Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

True Pundit reported on Thursday that the couple was working on a plea deal to avoid prison time. But on Friday federal sources said those talks had progressed into a likely immunity deal for the duo.

The focus of the federal probe has shifted from the bank fraud allegations against the Pakistani couple to classified intelligence breaches in Congress, FBI sources confirm.

Comment:


TV

Behind a guise of objective journalism, CNN's Deep State sycophant Jake Tapper is taking America to war

Jake Tapper
Posing as Trump's most dogged critic, Tapper has become the face and voice of American regime media.

This July, Millennium Films announced [3] it is producing an action film based on CNN anchor Jake Tapper's "The Outpost." The book is Tapper's dewy-eyed true life account of 53 American soldiers who bravely fought off an overwhelming force of Taliban insurgents from within their Alamo-style fortress in northeastern Afghanistan. Though Tapper conceded [4] that he covered the war from "the comfort of the North Lawn of the White House," his book won wide praise, including from conservatives like John Hinderaker, who wrote [5] that it "required an almost unimaginable amount of work-of patriotism." With President Donald Trump announcing a surge of thousands of new troops to Afghanistan, Tapper has provided Hollywood with perhaps the perfect vehicle to stir public sympathy for the troops tasked with continuing the 16-year-old war against the Taliban.

As the host of CNN's highly rated "The Lead," Tapper has branded himself as one of the president's most vehement critics, slamming Trump almost daily for his incompetence and hypocrisy. His indignant attacks on the president have earned him a fawning write-up in Slate as the "ideal newsman of our age [6]," praise from CNN contributor Van Jones as "a god," and a raft of puff pieces in glossy pop culture magazines. According to Vogue [7], he is "the internet hero - and journalistic sensation - of the Trump era." Jim Rutenberg, the media critic for the New York Times, claimed to GQ [8] that Tapper's popularity stemmed from him "doing very basic fact-checking and calling things out bluntly." Rutenberg added, "He doesn't let anyone off the hook."

Sherlock

Dana Rohrabacher calls for hearings on links between Clinton Foundation and Russian financiers

Dana Rohrabacher
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher's office issued the following letter:
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher has called on House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce to approve hearings on alleged corruption involving Russia and the Clinton Foundation, the global non-profit organization set up by former president Bill Clinton and his wife, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton.

Mrs. Clinton ran for president as the Democrat nominee in 2016.

Noting evidence that Russian financiers donated heavily to the foundation, the California Republican, who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia, and Emerging Threats, proposed an "under-oath examination of the relationship between the donations and the 2013 CFIUS approval of the sale of America's uranium reserves."

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States is the government's interagency body that reviews and authorizes investments in and purchases by foreign entities of American companies.

Rohrabacher's letter, sent to Royce on Wednesday, cites "new evidence that the Obama Administration had prior knowledge of possible bribery and violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act involving state-owned Russian nuclear industry figures, the Clinton Foundation, and other Americans prior to the CFIUS approval of the uranium transaction."

As much as 20 percent of the reserves were transferred to Russia because of the deal, said Rohrabacher.

The congressman also suggested the hearings look into Russian energy interests that provided financial support to a campaign to undermine the American fracking industry and the construction of oil and gas pipelines in this country.

"We can no longer wait," said Rohrabacher, "to fully inform the American people of alleged criminal collusion by the previous Administration with the Russians."
Last week Rep. Rohrabacher told Sean Hannity he was 99% certain that the Russian collusion narrative is a total lie. This week he doubled down and repeated the accusation.

Red Flag

Fruits of US Imperialism: War, disease and famine leave Yemen at breaking point

yemen destruction
© Anees Mahyoub / Reuters
Millions of Yemenis are on the brink of starvation while the country is in the midst of the world's fastest-growing cholera epidemic. Civil war, foreign military intervention, and a naval blockade have caused death and disease on a massive scale.

Yemen can no longer sustain itself following a prolonged and bloody insurrection and a brutal bombing campaign waged by the Saudi-led coalition since March 2015.

In spite of UN warnings about extremely high collateral damage caused by the airstrikes, the US and UK continue to supply Saudi Arabia with billions of dollars in arms.

The coalition of nine Arab states has carried out 5,676 airstrikes in Yemen so far this year, far surpassing the 3,936 launched in 2016.

Bulb

Merkel: Iran-style negotiations could be model for solving N. Korea crisis

north korea missile launch
© Kyodo / ReutersPeople watch news report showing North Korea's Hwasong-14 missile launch on electronic screen at Pyongyang station, North Korea
Direct multilateral talks with North Korea modeled on the landmark 2015 Iran deal may help cool tensions over Pyongyang's nuclear program, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said.

Speaking to the Frankfurter Allgemeine newspaper, Chancellor Merkel said comprehensive negotiations that led to the historic deal between Iran and all five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany could be a model for resolving the North Korean crisis.

"If our participation in these talks is desired, I will immediately say yes," Merkel said.

While saying she "could imagine" that such a format would help the "settlement of the North Korea conflict," Merkel also noted that Europe and Germany "should be prepared to play a very active part in that."

Light Sabers

NATO keeps saber rattling, calls North Korea "global threat" that requires response from NATO

Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptors
© Lee Jong-hyeon / News1 / ReutersTerminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptors
North Korea's "reckless behavior" is a "global threat" which requires a global response, including from NATO, alliance head Jens Stoltenberg said a week after Pyongyang claimed to have successfully tested an H-bomb.

"The reckless behavior of North Korea is a global threat and requires a global response and that of course also includes NATO," Stoltenberg said in a BBC interview, as cited by Reuters.

Stoltenberg stated that NATO is "totally focused on how we [the alliance] can contribute to a peaceful solution of the conflict."

Stoltenberg, however, declined to comment on whether the US territory of Guam in the Pacific, located 3,200km from North Korea, was covered by NATO's Article 5.

Bulb

Killary mercifully calls her career as an active politician over

killary
© REUTERS/ Brendan McDermid
In an interview with CBS Sunday Morning, former frontrunning Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton announced that she is "done" being a political candidate but will still be involved in politics.

"Is your political career over?" interviewer Jane Pauley asked Clinton on the Sunday show.

"Yes," Clinton responded.

"As an active politician, it's over," she added, cited by The Hill.

Comment: At a separate point in the interview, she also called using a private email server "her most important mistake", although the way it's phrased it doesn't sound like she thinks she did anything wrong, just that the public's reaction meant it became an issue:
"It was presented in such a negative way, and I never could get out from under it. And it never stopped."
Yeah, it's too bad she "couldn't get out from under" breaking federal law. Who would have thought politicians would be held to such a standard? One can imagine all the laws she's broken over the years led her to believe she no longer had to follow the laws of the country she wanted to lead. As she learned the hard way, public figures are held to a standard that she couldn't live up to.


Bullseye

Washington is the isolated tyrannical regime, not Pyongyang

washington
If Pentagon chief James Mattis was seeking to reassure the world of American restraint in the North Korea crisis, he clumsily did the opposite. The US Defense Secretary was speaking after intense discussions with President Trump and other senior military officials in the White House Situation Room following the sixth nuclear test carried out by North Korea on Sunday.

Mattis emerged from the meeting to say that any threat from North Korea to the United States and its allies would be met with an «overwhelming military response». He then added - with a weirdly presumed ethical tone - that the US «was not looking to the total annihilation of North Korea».

That was supposed to mean that the US military would exercise restraint - by not obliterating a country with a population of 25 million. Well, we should be so grateful. That's so goddamn generous of the Americans!

How reassuring that the United States with a nuclear arsenal of 5,000 warheads should express an apparent reluctance to annihilate. So, US rulers are bragging about hitting North Korea with overwhelming military power, but at the same time Washington expects to be given moral credit for stating that it is not looking to annihilate a whole country.

Play

Russian FM spokeswoman Zakharova: The US destroys diplomatic relations with Russia

The video has been banned on YouTube:


Vader

What America's aristocracy wants is to conquer the entire world

New America Foundation
The American aristocracy want inequality of rights, with two basic polar-opposite classes: the 'elite', with themselves at the top of everything, and everybody else below them, as subjects to be ruled by them, in such ways as they (themselves, and their fellow 'elite') can agree to do. They are convinced that they have earned their high status, in one way or another, and they compete ferociously amongst themselves, to rise even higher within the aristocracy.

Many of the aristocrats think that they are 'elite' because they are the richest; many think instead that the 'elite' are the smartest or the most cunning; and, a third group think that the 'elite' are the «well-born» who descended from 'superior' people - they believe in an inherited elitist version of Hitler's generic racist vision, of the 'Aryans' versus the 'non-Aryans'. Instead of being such racists, however, this third category are simply classists, who define their aristocratic rights as being inherited from their ancestors - so, they're similar to racists, insofar as they are obsessed with genealogy (like racists are), but their obsession is focused instead upon their own family, not upon any «race» at all. They 'come from the right family', not from 'the right race'. This third type of aristocrat believe in inherited rights and obligations. They believe that they possess an inherited right to control the public - the non-aristocrats (the 'lower class').

In whichever of the three ways that a member of the 'elite' might happen to see 'the elite' as being constituted, they all agree together, that an 'elite', which includes themselves, should rule (and should have more rights than) the ruled, and that everyone else (the public) should obey, or else be punished for not doing 'their duty' to obey, their 'superiors'.

All of the aristocrats thus favor the aristocracy against the public. It is their solidarity, which binds them together, and which causes them to relate personally only to others of their type, and to view everyone else as being either their agents, or else their enemies - but not part of the aristocracy.