Puppet MastersS


Russian Flag

Moscow slams conviction of Bosnian Serb leader

Milorad Dodik
© Global Look Press / Nedim GrabovicaBosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik
Russia has denounced the conviction of Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik by a court in Sarajevo, describing it as an "absolutely political" decision. The move could have wide-reaching repercussions for the entire Balkan region, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.

A Bosnian court sentenced Dodik, the president of Republika Srpska, to one year in prison on Wednesday. He was charged with obstructing decisions made by Bosnia's constitutional court and defying the authority of international envoy Christian Schmidt. A German national, Schmidt was formally tasked with overseeing the implementation of the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement that concluded the Bosnian war. Moscow questions his legitimacy due to what it considers to be appointment irregularities.

"We condemn such actions because they can have very negative consequences not just for Bosnia and Herzegovina but for the Balkans as a whole," Peskov told journalists on Thursday, referring to the court decision. "These actions could lead to destabilization," he added.

Explosion

EU trying to block Ukraine peace - Lavrov

FILE PHOTO: Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.
© Sputnik / Ramil SitdikovFILE PHOTO: Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.
The bloc has doubled down on military support for Kiev as the political landscape around the conflict is starting to shift, the Russian foreign minister has said

The EU is seeking to derail the Ukraine peace process by pushing the country to continue fighting against Russia, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has said.

Speaking at a press conference in Qatar on Wednesday, Lavrov weighed in on a resolution drafted by the US calling for a "swift end" to the Ukraine conflict, which was approved by the UN Security Council on Monday. The document, which was supported by Russia and China, excluded strong language denouncing Moscow. The resolution also came after US President Donald Trump refused to condemn Russia over the Ukraine conflict while blaming Kiev for failing to prevent the hostilities.

Comment:
From the same source:

27 Feb, 2025 18:44
Putin warns of attempts to sabotage talks with US
[...]

Speaking at the meeting of the board of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on Thursday, Putin said that contacts with the Trump administration "inspire hope." The two sides are willing to work on restoring bilateral relations, as well as resolving "systemic" issues in the global security architecture that led to the Ukraine conflict and other crises. Yet, some forces want to prevent that from happening, the president warned.

"We realize that not everyone is happy to see Russia-US contacts resume. A portion of Western elites are still committed to maintaining instability in the world, and these forces will try to disrupt or to compromise the newly resumed dialogue," he said. "We need to keep this in mind and leverage every possibility offered by diplomacy and special services to thwart such attempts," he told the gathered FSB officials.

According to Putin, the new US administration is demonstrating "pragmatism and a realistic vision of things." Moscow's "partners" in Washington "have abandoned numerous stereotypes, the so-called rules, and messianic, ideological clichés of their predecessors, which, in fact, caused the crisis of the entire system of international relations," he said.

Putin has indicated Moscow's readiness to resolve the Ukraine conflict through peaceful means. He emphasized Russia's aim of establishing an international system that ensures a balanced and mutual consideration of interests, creating a long-term, indivisible European and global security framework. This system would prevent the security of certain countries from being guaranteed at the expense of others, including Russia.
[...]
Is the following and expression of discontent with peace initiatives?

27 Feb, 2025 21:10
France hands light sentences to Russian consulate attackers
Russia has slammed the eight months of house arrest given to the perpetrators as too lenient for an attempted terror attack

The two French nationals, referred to as Vasile H., 48, and Georges S., 59, were charged with "unauthorized manufacture of an explosive or incendiary device," as well as "attempted property damage by means dangerous to people," Le Figaro wrote on Thursday. Both were sentenced to eight months of home arrest, to be served with mandatory ankle monitoring bracelets, the newspaper added.

The men, both employees of the National Center for Scientific Research, had admitted their guilt in the arson attack, Reuters wrote on Thursday. Prosecutors had been seeking a year of monitoring for the pair, according to the outlet.
[...]
The attackers procured liquid nitrogen from their workplace and used it to fashion explosive devices. The super-cooled liquid gas is usually stored at below -196 degrees Celsius (-321 Fahrenheit) and rapidly turns into a gas once placed into a closed container, increasing the pressure, Le Figaro wrote, citing Vasile H. The two accomplices brought a thermos flask with the chemical, fashioned their makeshift explosives from plastic soda bottles and threw them onto the Russian consulate grounds, he reportedly explained.

"I threw a bottle but it fell next to the neighbor's house. I ran away and I didn't hear anything. I told myself that I had done it for nothing," he reportedly said.

Georges S. admitted that had one of their explosive devices landed on a person, it would have caused injuries, according to Le Figaro.

The suspects were reportedly detained at a rally in support of Ukraine later the same day.
[...]



Mr. Potato

Zelensky shouted at Trump envoy over resource deal - FT

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky.
© Vladimir Zelensky's officeUS Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky.
The Ukrainian leader reportedly "found himself in trouble" after pushing back against Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's demands

Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky lashed out at one of Donald Trump's top officials over a US demand that Kiev hand over 50% of its critical minerals as compensation for aid in the conflict with Russia, the Financial Times reported on Monday, citing sources.

Zelensky's frustration reportedly boiled over during a closed-door meeting with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Kiev on February 12. An unidentified person present at the office claimed that "the gravelly voice shouting from inside was unmistakable"

Comment:
Ukrainian officials, however, have disputed this figure, insisting that the US has only actually provided Ukraine with only $100 billion in aid
If 100 billion US dollar have been handed off to Ukraine, according to Ukrainian sources, do they include the 5 billion to get a "regime change" going in 2014, which then led to the conflict and war, which then required aid from the US, since the Western supporters rather than asking Kiev to abide by the Minsk agreement signed in 2015, preferred to push for training and rearmament, and once the war had begun in a more intensive format in February 2022, told Kiev, around April of the same year, that it was not allowed to make peace with Russia.

The 100 billion in aid does possibly not include the price of US satellite support for operations. Moreover due to US imposed sanctions against Russia and some related countries, losses have even been incurred even by US companies, including banking institutions, since more countries have begun trading in US offending "non-dollars". Shouldn't Ukraine pay for those sacrifices?

Where is Zelensky's appreciation for the western efforts to make Ukraine a country where corruption is discouraged, but mainly has been improved upon, and without which Zelensky would not be in in office and stay for longer than his legal term according to the constitution?


Attention

Epstein Files - Phase 1 of...?

Files Released
© Off-Guardian
It's Epstein Day! The morning has finally broken and files are here, and everything is going to be alright.

OK, fine, most of the information being released is already public, thanks to various court filings and FOIA requests.

And OK, fine, the much-delayed release seems to be (shock! horror!) largely a publicity stunt involving right-wing "influencers".

And OK, fine, they also announced the release will be "phased", which is a practical step to deal with a mountain of documents and NOT in ANY WAY a cheap trick to prolong drama and intrigue, like ending a TV show on a cliffhanger.

And OK, fine, these files are as reliably genuine as anything else released by Deep State institutions...which is to say totally 100% unreliable.

...but still, Epstein files!

Star of David

Israel breaks ceasefire agreement, refuses to exit Philadelphi Corridor on Egyptian border

netanyahu philadelphi corridor gaza ceasefire
© File Image/ReutersIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stands before a map of the Gaza Strip, telling viewers that Israel must retain control over the "Philadelphi corridor," a strategic area along the territory's border with Egypt, during a news conference in Jerusalem, September 2, 2024. Hebrew onscreen reads, "Philadelphi corridor under Israeli military control".
Israel will not withdraw its forces from the Gaza-Egypt border as would be necessary under a potential second phase of a ceasefire with Hamas, according to a CNN report, citing an Israeli source.

"We will not exit the Philadelphi Corridor," CNN quoted a source as saying, referring to the 14 km strip along the border.

"We will not allow Hamas murderers to roam again with trucks and rifles on our borders, and we will not let them strengthen themselves again through smuggling," added the source.

The announcement comes just days before the first phase of the Israel-Hamas hostage ceasefire agreement is set to expire, and only hours after Hamas released the final hostages scheduled for release under the phase.

Comment: ABC News adds:
The Philadelphi corridor was one of the main sticking points in negotiations between Israel and Hamas for months before the current ceasefire deal was reached. This refusal could lead to a crisis with both Hamas and Egypt, the key mediator, at a delicate time for the already fragile truce.

Israel was supposed to begin withdrawing from the Philadelphi corridor -- and the entire Gaza Strip -- on Saturday, the last day of the first phase of the ceasefire agreement. Israel was to complete its withdrawal from the corridor within eight days.

Management of the corridor is a red line for Hamas, which had refused to accept ceasefire proposals that did not require Israel to withdraw its troops from the border region.

Israeli officials have said in recent months that they believed the Israeli army had to stay in the Philadelphi corridor to prevent weapons being smuggled through the Egyptian border, back into Gaza, though Israel has destroyed tunnels in that area.

Defense Minister Israel Katz said at a meeting with local leaders that he had seen tunnels penetrating the border on a recent visit to the corridor.

Former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant had publicly opposed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's insistence that Israel must remain in the corridor -- and in the Netzarim corridor, which divides north and south Gaza -- to maintain its security and achieve its military goals and maintain its security.

In August, then-Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi said holding on to any part of Gaza or the Philadelphi corridor are conditions Israel should not use as an excuse to break a potential deal with Hamas. The Israeli army can deal with both being out of Gaza and giving up control of Philadelphi, according to Halevi.
Bibi is so far off the deep end, he ignores his own advisors.


Bad Guys

Trump takes aim at the federal 'crown jewel': Orders Pentagon audit

pentagon
The new Trump administration has made some pretty groundbreaking moves, starting with the dismantling of agencies such as the infamous USAID (or perhaps moving its activities back to intelligence services?). However, that's only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the endlessly corrupt US federal institutions. Aided by the likes of Elon Musk and his DOGE, Trump aims to either reform and resize them significantly or outright dismantle them all. The ongoing reshuffling in the FBI is a good example of this, with the new director Kash Patel (who also just took over the ATF) and his upcoming deputy Dan Bongino poised to make historic changes in the disgraced agency. There have also been announcements that both the Fed and Fort Knox will be audited, which is a truly unprecedented move as no president in recent memory (or ever) dared question either of those.

This also extends to American states, particularly the DNC-dominated California, infamous for its neoliberal extremism. The new Trump administration is now launching audits and investigating the state's exorbitantly expensive and inefficient projects, especially as its governor Gavin Newsom is demanding $40 billion in federal relief funds for LA fires.

Star of David

What anti-Palestinian legislation to look out for in the new Congress

blue capitol
© Disdento/KJNCapitol Hill
In recent years we have seen an increasing amount of congressional legislation targeting criticism of Israel and boycotts of the country.

This push only increased when the genocidal assault on Gaza began last year. We can anticipate further efforts as the GOP now controls the presidency, the Senate, and the House. However, many of these bills were pushed during the Biden administration and have found support on both sides of the aisles.

Mondoweiss U.S. correspondent Michael Arria spoke with Foundation for Middle East Peace (FMEP) President Lara Friedman. Friedman's weekly Legislative Round-Up is required reading for anyone who wants to stay informed on the latest bills in Congress and the discussion in Washington, DC. In the conversation Friedman discusses Trump's pro-Israel Executive Orders and what anti-Palestinian bills people should watch during this congressional session.

Mondoweiss: We are seeing Trump run back a lot of his policies from his first term, but also expand upon them in a variety of ways. What has stood out to you about the administration so far?
Lara Friedman: In terms of the Executive Orders, they clearly came in much better prepared this time with the intention to hit the ground running and fire in all directions. I talked to people before Trump came in who were saying, "Don't worry, they can't do everything all at once." However, that is clearly the actual intention.

The antisemitism executive order of the first term took them quite a while to get to. Biden never rescinded it, so it was already there when they returned to power, but they came out of the gates with Executive Orders on antisemitism, targeting the ICC and going after students. They're checking all the boxes.

Arrow Down

Zelensky now with only the dictatorship in London to support him

Magnify
© SCF
We are living in unprecedented times of sensational stupidity and perhaps ignorance from politicians which we have never seen before.

What is the definition of a 'dictator'? In the days that followed Trump's social media post calling President Zelensky one, British media seized upon the subject and ran with it for days. Various public figures were asked whether Trump was right to use the word and whether they believed Zelensky was actually one. Two figures from the right, Nigel Farage and Liz Truss both said they thought Trump was both wrong to call him one and that in fact he wasn't one.

This remarkable endearment for Zelensky is really the core of the problem in the west in particular the UK, where its leader Sir Keir Starmer declared that he would be ready to send British troops to Ukraine - a suggestion which was quickly shot down by the elites of Germany and France as preposterous.

It's rare that the giants of the EU put the British government in its place on world affairs but we are living in unprecedented times of sensational stupidity and perhaps ignorance from politicians which we have never seen before.

Attention

The US is giving its European vassals what they've been asking for, and it's brutal

JDVance
© Sven Hoppe/picture alliance/Getty ImagesUS Vice President JD Vance • 61st Munich Security Conference • February 14, 2025 • Munich, Germany
The EU had ample warning not to blindly throw in its lot with Washington. The warning was ignored, and now a reckoning is due.

It's the "end of an era" and Germany is "in disarray." And not just Germany: "Pandemonium" rages in Europe; the continent is under "assault." Its elites are "shaken, anxious, and sometimes aghast," as an "ideological war" has been declared against their fiefdom, which is being "left in the dust." A big "boom" has sounded, and a "ferocious reckoning" is underway. In short, it's a "European nightmare."

The above are quotes from (in order of appearance), the Financial Times, The Telegraph, and The Economist (all three from Britain), Le Monde (France), Bloomberg (US), Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung and Bild (both Germany), and, finally, the (German) head of the Munich Security Conference Christoph Heusgen himself. Later, Heusgen, a beyond-middle-aged man and experienced bureaucrat, just cried, literally. For which he was applauded.

What happened? Have "the Russians" finally done what whole divisions of NATO-EU politicians, generals, admirals, think tankers, media talking heads and careerist intellectuals have been feverishly promising for years already? Are their tanks rolling down the Kudamm in Berlin and the Champs Elysees in Paris already? Not that Moscow has given any sound reason to believe it wants to do such things (who'd want to conquer a heap of economic misery, demographic malaise, and cultural pessimism, really?) But that has never mattered to European "elite" fantasies.

No, it's not that: The Russians are not coming. Indeed, it's the other way around. As in that 1970s Hollywood horror movie where "the call comes from inside the house," the sum of all fears for NATO-EU Europe is now emanating from Washington. How ironic.

Arrow Up

Trump's 'America first'? Africa's 'about time'

Trump AFrica
© Business Insider/guideoftheworld.com/KJNUS President Donald Trump and the question of Africa
When Donald Trump was elected as the 47th US president, there was no doubt that his country's foreign policy, and more particularly, its relationship with African nations, would shift.

Diplomacy and foreign policy experts in Africa argue that Trump's 'America First' doctrine is likely to reduce US engagements with the continent, which offers it a renewed impetus to deepen ties with Eastern powers, such as China, India, and Russia.

Dr. Joshua Ochiel, a foreign policy expert at the Nairobi-based African Centre for Technology Studies told RT:
"During his first term in office, Donald Trump's foreign policy seemed not to favour Africa and that is unlikely to change during his second stint at the Oval Office. Trump's disengagement policy inadvertently creates an opportunity for Africa to 'face the East' and negotiate new mutually beneficial partnerships. Africa can use Trump's political comeback to break free from Western dominance and control which has for decades stifled the continent's economic, democratic and social growth and freedom."
Steven Nduvi, a policy expert at the Global Center for Policy and Strategy (GLOCEPS), notes that Russia, China and India have a lot to offer Africa and that the continent must, without fear, cement its relations with the East.