Puppet MastersS


Arrow Down

Brexit talks near collapse after Merkel-Johnson row

MerkelJohnson
© handelsblatt.com/Independent.co.ukGerman Chancellor Angela Merkel • UK PM Boris Johnson
Talks over a Brexit deal are on the brink of collapse, as a No 10 source said that Angela Merkel was making a deal impossible and Brussels accused Boris Johnson of trying to play a "stupid blame game".

The row erupted after Johnson and Merkel had a phone conversation in which they could not find a common position over Northern Ireland.

In an extraordinary briefing about the confidential discussion between the leaders, a No 10 source later said the German chancellor's demands for Northern Ireland to remain in a customs union made a deal look "essentially impossible, not just now but ever".

The briefing prompted a frustrated reaction from Donald Tusk, the European council president, who tweeted directly at Johnson:
"What's at stake is not winning some stupid blame game. At stake is the future of Europe and the UK as well as the security and interests of our people. You don't want a deal, you don't want an extension, you don't want to revoke. Quo vadis? [Where are you going?]"

Comment: See also:


Footprints

Trump's troop withdrawal: US should have never been in the Middle East

Trump
© Ap/Alex BrandonUS President Donald Trump: 'US should never have been in the Middle East in the first place!"
The US president replied to a tweet by 'Twitter Moments' which claimed that the White House said Ankara will be moving forward with its incoming operation and will take responsibility for all Daesh fighters they capture.

US President Donald Trump has commented of the US troop pullout from Syria, saying that the United States should never have been in the Middle East in the first place. In a follow-up post, he added that going into the US military involvement in the Middle East was "the worst decision ever made in the history" of the country.

"We went to war under a false and now disproven premise, weapons of mass destruction. There were none!" he said, referring to the build-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, when the Bush administration claimed that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction — which were nowhere to be found.

On Monday, Trump said that getting the US out of military conflicts was the reason he was elected president. He also specified that the US military should fight only where it is in the country's interest, "and only fight to win".

Comment:





Arrow Down

Paper tiger politics? Hotheads in Congress want to kick Turkey out of NATO, a move lacking procedure

Erdogan
© Reuters/Kacper PempelTurkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan
Members of the US Congress have threatened to kick Turkey out of NATO if it sent troops into northern Syria against Washington's Kurdish allies. What would be the consequences of such a step?

If Ankara launches a military operation against the Kurds in Syria, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) said he would submit a bill that would suspend Turkey's NATO membership.

Similar statements have been made in the US before - in January 2018, for example, when Turkish forces were engaged in fighting near Afrin, and Fox News aired an opinion that Turkey should be pushed out of NATO. The channel is known to have the ear of US President Donald Trump. The call was repeated in July 2019, during another escalation over Cyprus.

It is not yet clear what procedures will be invoked to execute the ruling. The NATO treaty does not provide for a clear procedure of expulsion. There is Article 13, which reads as follows:
"After the Treaty has been in force for twenty years, any Party may cease to be a Party one year after its notice of denunciation has been given to the Government of the United States of America, which will inform the Governments of the other Parties of the deposit of each notice of denunciation."
No word of expulsion, only ceasing to be a member at one's own initiative. To date, the only example of this was France's voluntary suspension of any engagement in the bloc's military structures, under Charles de Gaulle. It appears Brussels (or Washington) would first have to draft the expulsion procedure, get it approved by all the NATO members, and then use the legally binding act to somehow push Turkey out. So far, it is unclear how US threats versus Ankara could materialize.

X

'Sanctions from hell' labeled good, but tariffs are terrible? Embargo obsession is single-minded

Graham
© Reuters/Kevin LamarqueSenator Lindsey Graham
The Washington establishment is now threatening sanctions against NATO ally Turkey if it moves against the US-allied Kurdish militias in Syria, once again showing that coercion is the only arrow in its policy quiver.

Both Democrats and Republicans spoke up against President Donald Trump's decision on Monday to move back some of the US troops stationed - illegally - in Syria, declaring that this would be a death knell to the Kurdish militias the US has used as boots on the ground against Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) terrorists.

Trump himself threatened to "totally destroy and obliterate" the Turkish economy if Ankara did anything he considered "off limits," but that was not enough for Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina). Though often Trump's ally on matters domestic, the unrepentant foreign policy hawk threatened Turkey on Tuesday with "sanctions from hell... wide, deep and devastating" if it enters northern Syria.

Boat

Pompeo: Tanker Adrian Darya 1 offloaded oil in Syria, EU should 'hold Iran accountable'

Adrian Darya tanker
© Marcelo del Pozo/BloombergAdrian Darya 1 tanker
Last month, Iran's foreign ministry said that the Adrian Darya 1, the tanker at the heart of an international controversy involving Tehran, Gibraltar, the UK and the US, had made it to its destination and sold its oil after being released by Gibraltar authorities.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has tweeted an image including two inset satellite images allegedly showing the offloading of oil from Iran's Adrian Darya 1 tanker in Syria, claiming that the image 'proved' "that Iran lied to the UK and Gibraltar".
According to Pompeo, the tanker's "terrorist oil" would now be used to "fund [Syrian President Bashar] Assad's war and Iran's sectarian violence". The top US diplomat called on the European Union's members to "condemn this action" and "hold Iran accountable".

The edited image cited by Pompeo appeared to feature an earlier released image showing activity around the Adrian Darya 1, including the presence of a smaller tanker with mooring lines between the ships and a crane deployed by the larger vessel.

Comment: See also:

Tanker Trackers: Pompeo jumped the gun in claims Iran sells oil to Syria


Handcuffs

Political prisoner Viktor Bout couldn't give the Americans dirt on Putin, consequence was jail

Viktor Bout
© Reuters/Sukree SukplangViktor Bout during extradition procedures in Thailand.
Viktor Bout, who has served about a third of his 25-year term, insists he is a political prisoner and a victim of biased US justice. RT spoke to him about why he believes things went south for him.

The Russian businessman was arrested in Thailand in 2008 after a sting operation by the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). He was accused of agreeing to sell anti-aircraft missiles to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), extradited, and sent to jail.

In an exclusive interview with RT, Bout said he was sentenced on bogus grounds and that his punishment was excessively harsh simply because he is Russian.
"I am here [because of] my nationality. I denied to cooperate with their side. The State Department a few years ago openly admitted: 'Yeah, we're gonna keep him as an example, as a whipping boy so other Russians are more polite and cooperative with us when we go after their corrupt regime.' They approached and said: 'we are going to get all your family the green card and settle you there if you tell us some dirt about Putin and how corrupt his regime is and so on.' And I said you've come to the wrong person. That's why I went to the trial."
Watch a report by RT's Caleb Maupin:


Comment: See also:


Bullseye

Eric Zuesse: Update on the MH17 Case

mh17 crash site
© Agence France-Presse / Bulent KilicA photo taken on July 23, 2014 shows the crash site of the downed Malaysia Airlines flight MH17, in a field near the village of Grabove, in the Donetsk region.
The Netherlands Government is resisting an effort by Dutch victims' families to find out why Ukraine's Government, on 17 July 2014 — when the Malaysian airliner MH17 was shot down while flying over Ukraine's civil-war zone — this passenger-plane had been guided by Ukraine's air-traffic control to fly through, instead of around (as it instructed other airliners), the war-zone. On 1 October 2019, now more than five years after 196 Dutch nationals had died from that incident, Holland's RTL News headlined (as autotranslated into English) "Cabinet considers research into Ukraine's role in disaster MH17", and reported that "The cabinet will examine whether further research is possible on the role of Ukraine in the disaster with flight MH17," because "A proposal ... for the investigation received the support of all Parties present in the second chamber" of Holland's parliament. This news-report said that, "So far, the cabinet has not taken any steps against Ukraine. As far as we know, nothing is happening behind the scenes."

Furthermore: "Last year, the Netherlands, together with Australia, decided to make Russia as a country liable. For the liability of Ukraine, according to the cabinet, there was 'no evidence' and also 'no research needed'." Moreover, Dutch Foreign Minister Stefan Blok said that "We don't see any reason for an investigation" into that, because "The government is trying to maintain its relationship with Ukraine," and "because then both the airspace of Ukraine and that of Russia should be looked at," and because "there are still no indications that Ukraine can also be held liable." But actually, from the very start of that investigation, there has been a secret agreement not to blame Ukraine for anything having to do with the incident. This agreement is kept secret from the Dutch people. Blok, in resisting to investigate why the MH17 was guided over the civil-war zone, was simply adhering to the secret agreement that Netherlands had signed with Ukraine on 8 August 2014. If he were to agree to the families' demand, he still would be obligated, by Holland's 8 August 2014 agreement with Ukraine, to find Ukraine not to have perpetrated the downing. But the families don't know this.

2 + 2 = 4

Quid pro quo, extortion: Welcome to foreign relations

trump zelensky
© Jonathan Ernst/ReutersUkraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy listens during a bilateral meeting with President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, September 25, 2019.
The coverage of the Trump administration's pressure on Ukraine is verging on the absurd, as to both what is alleged to have been a wrong and the degree to which we should judge it wrong. In particular, I am referring to the concepts of quid pro quo and of extorting a foreign government.

To listen to commentary, not only by anti-Trumpers but even some Trump defenders who don't seem to understand what they're talking about, one would think that a quid pro quo is always bad, and that it is a terrible thing to pressure a foreign government.

This is nonsense. Foreign relations typically involve quid pro quo arrangements. Governments do not ordinarily assist each other out of fondness. Nations pursue their interests in the world. Where interests align, they assist each other. Where interests are opposed, they are adverse to each other. In any event, they bargain with each other to advance their interests. It is a matter of "We want you to do this; what do we need to do - whether for you or to you - to make you do it?"

The term quid pro quo has a sinister connotation because we most often hear it in connection with political-corruption cases, often involving bribery. In truth, all exchanges involve a quid pro quo, but most are not corrupt. When they are corrupt, it is not because Country A is asking Country B for something, but because Country A is asking for something that it is wrong to ask for. If the request is not improper, there is nothing wrong with a quid pro quo.

Stock Down

Will the Fed make Trump a new Herbert Hoover?

depression out of business
In recent months US President Trump has pointed repeatedly to his role in making the American economy the "best ever." But behind the extreme highs of the stock market and the official government unemployment data, the US economy is primed for a 1929-style shock, a financial Tsunami that is more influenced by independent Fed actions than by anything that the White House has done since January 2017. At this point the parallels between one-time Republican President Herbert Hoover who presided over the great stock crash and economic depression that was created then by the Fed policies, and Trump in 2019 are looking ominously similar. It underscores that the real power lies with those who control our money, not elected politicians.

Despite proclamations to the contrary, the true state of the US economy is getting more precarious by the day. The Fed policies of Quantitative Easing and Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP) implemented after the 2008 crash, contrary to claims, did little to directly rebuild the real US economy. Instead it funneled trillions to the very banks responsible for the 2007-8 real estate bubble. That "cheap money" in turn flowed to speculative high-return investment around the world. It created speculative bubbles in emerging market debt in countries like Turkey, Argentina, Brazil and even China. It created huge investment in high-risk debt, so called junk bonds, in the US corporate sector in areas like shale oil ventures or companies like Tesla. The Trump campaign promise of rebuilding America's decaying infrastructure has gone nowhere and a divided Congress is not about to unite for the good of the nation at this point. The real indicator of the health of the real economy where real people struggle to make ends meet lies in the record levels of debt.

Today, fully a decade after the unprecedented actions of three presidents, the US economy is deeper in debt than ever in its history. And debt is controlled by interest rates, interest rates ultimately in the hands of the Fed. Let's look at some signs of serious trouble which could easily put the economy in a severe recession by this time in 2020.

Whistle

Trey Gowdy joins Trump's legal team in impeachment fight

Trey Gowdy
© Getty ImagesTrey Gowdy
Former Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy has been tapped to serve as outside counsel to President Donald Trump as the House impeachment inquiry expands.

That's according to an administration official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal legal matters.

Gowdy is a former South Carolina congressman who did not seek reelection last year to the seat he had held for eight years.

Comment: More from Breitbart:
Former Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) has reportedly signed on to serve as outside counsel to President Donald Trump as part of his efforts to fight the House Democrats' impeachment inquiry.

An unnamed administration official confirmed the move to the Associated Press on Tuesday evening.

Gowdy, who retired from Congress last year, represented South Carolina's 4th Congressional District for eight years.

The former lawmaker served as House Oversight Committee chairman and oversaw the investigation into former Secretary of State Hilary Clinton and the events surrounding the 2012 terror attack in Benghazi, Libya. Since leaving Washington, D.C., Gowdy joined the law firm Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough and signed on as a Fox News Channel contributor.



Well, this will certainly make for interesting viewing. Trey Gowdy has a firmly established track record of eviscerating the liars who dare sit before him.