Puppet MastersS


Bomb

Who's your daddy?: NATO Secretary General Admits EU Incapable Of Defense Without US Help

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and Donald Trump
The globalist frenzy of the Davos Summit is subsiding and the geopolitical world is left to ponder (and question) some of the more "optimistic" comments made by world leaders. One such claim was made by Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who argued that Europe 'unequivocally' has the ability to defend itself without US support.

The claim coincided with the Finnish leader's assertion that a "new world order" is rising with the UN at the helm.

The suggestion has, of course, drawn scrutiny as being overly optimistic. Stubb tried to qualify his argument with the assertion that Finland has the best cold weather troops in the world and the future of warfare is focused on the Arctic Circle.

Attention

Greenland stunt to be followed by Iran game. Trump in a pickle

US / Iran War
© Public Domain
Trump's recent retreat on Greenland is interesting in that it was the jittery bond market and his own lacklustre poll ratings that pushed him back from executing the most banal piece of U.S. foreign policy in a century by any sitting president. The Europeans liked to believe it was their stand against him - with several countries sending troop contingents to show the one thing he could not have imagined: that while Trump may be happy to destroy NATO for his own political gain, no one imagined EU countries would do the same to take a stand against the crazy Donald.

So, backing himself into a corner and then using the smoke and mirrors of the Davos press pack to neatly extract himself from what would have been a disastrous move - alienating himself further from world leaders - could be described as an act of genius. He dodged a bullet from his own gun.

But Iran is different.

With two U.S. aircraft carriers now heading toward the Persian Gulf (or at least in that general direction), few, if any, know what Trump's next move will be - for the simple reason that even Trump himself is clueless. Seasoned commentators like Alastair Crooke rightly point out that Trump is looking for a neat, quick strike he can chalk up as a victory, but realistically this will be hard. Tehran has already stated that any attack will result in all-out war. No more measured responses.

With the midterms not far off, the last thing Trump needs now is a war in the Middle East with U.S. body bags arriving home. That would almost certainly push voters to oust his party from both houses, opening the door to court cases against him. This latter prospect might not irk him much, but it's worth noting.

The real issue is: how does he wriggle out of a massive standoff with the Iranians and pull off the bluff that he threw his weight around, threatened Tehran's leaders, and they buckled? The answer is with an awful lot of fake news, which the Western media will obligingly provide. When the "armada" gets close to the Persian Gulf, our TV screens will be filled with images of fighter jets tearing down runways before launching into the skies, accompanied no doubt by CIA/Mossad video clips portraying Iran on the brink of collapse and the regime crumbling.

Footprints

US military moves Navy, Air Force assets to the Middle East: What to know

Map US military presence
11 permanent bases • 12 other sites
Trump says US 'armada' is heading towards the Gulf, raising fears of a military escalation in the region.

A United States aircraft carrier strike group is heading towards the Gulf as tensions build with Iran.

The US military last staged a major build-up in the Middle East in June - days before striking three Iranian nuclear sites during Israel's 12-day war with Tehran.

This month, US President Donald Trump backed antigovernment protesters in Iran. "Help is on its way," he told them as the government cracked down. But last week, he dialled down the military rhetoric. The protests have since been quashed.

So what are the US military assets moving to the Gulf? And is the US preparing to strike Iran again?

Arrow Down

China's sacked top general accused of leaking nuclear secrets to US: Report

General Zhang Youxia
© Russian Presidential & Information OfficeGeneral Zhang Youxia
On Saturday morning the world woke up to news that China's most senior military officer, who is second only to Xi Jinping, has been put under investigation over alleged "grave violations of discipline and the law." The detained Gen. Zhang Youxia is a vice chairman of the Central Military Commission, the Communist Party body that controls China's armed forces, and this was a major shock given he is widely regarded as President Xi's closest ally within the military, until now.

Another shock is just what he is being investigated for. While all the initial speculation focused on corruption, The Wall Street Journal on Sunday reveals the top general is accused of leaking information about the country's nuclear-weapons program [to] the United States. However, this has not yet been confirmed through official Chinese statements or sources.

X

Erosion of freedom in the EU: From censorship to centralized power

EU/Censor
© protect1st.orgOpen censorship of freedoms • European Union
The European Union has increasingly fallen on the defensive in foreign policy. Domestically, the Green Deal has significantly damaged the economic foundation. Together with its main pillars Berlin and Paris, the Brussels-based EU Commission is pushing forward the systematic construction of a censorship apparatus to suppress its own failures from public debate.

The heated discussion in recent days over the censorship of unpopular platforms like Nius is far more than just a warning sign. Schleswig-Holstein's Minister-President Daniel Günther offered a deep insight into the strategic toolbox of current politics during Markus Lanz's ZDF show. The politician's subsequent, at times desperate, attempts — alongside the host and state-affiliated media — to retract his openly stated censorship demands toward critical platforms and media such as Nius illustrate the seriousness of the situation: Germany is slowly but steadily sliding toward a surveillance state.

Attention

JD Vance notes something very important about Minneapolis chaos

Minneapolis chaos
Last week CPB commander Greg Bovino was asked what makes Minneapolis different from other cities where ICE enforcement operations have taken place. Bovino noted in the Minneapolis region there is no separation between the extremists on the ground and the people in local government. Today, Vice President JD Vance concurs and expands on that sentiment:
Vance statement
What Vice-President Vance says here is very important. The regional government is a stakeholder in maintaining the chaos on the streets. Why? Because for two decades a cancer of rampant financial fraud has been permitted to spread throughout the Minneapolis region and has now reached the stage of visible metastasis.

Sheriff

Trump deploys border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota as ICE operations face violent chaos

Thomas Homan
© KPIXWhite House border czar Thomas Homan
Two anti-ICE protesters were killed by federal agents this month as crowds interfere with immigration arrests

President Donald Trump is sending border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota, the president announced on Monday.

Trump said Homan will report "directly to me" and will help lead the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Minneapolis and St. Paul. The Justice Department and Congress are also investigating Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., Trump says.

"I am sending Tom Homan to Minnesota tonight. He has not been involved in that area, but knows and likes many of the people there. Tom is tough but fair, and will report directly to me," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

Propaganda

Deep State mouthpiece NY Times parrots Strzok lies about watchdog's Crossfire Hurricane findings in attack on Kash Patel

Kash Patel  Peter Strozk
FBI Director Kash Patel and disgraced ex-FBI agent Peter Strozk
NYT published a critical story on "A Year Inside Kash Patel's FBI." The article contained several factual errors, but never seemed to challenge -- or even research -- Strzok's false allegations. A simple review of public records could have avoided that.

The New York Times allowed fired FBI special agent Peter Strzok to mislead about the conclusions reached years ago by the Justice Department inspector general about bias related to the bureau's Crossfire Hurricane investigation during the paper's critiques against FBI Director Kash Patel this week.

The outlet published an article on Thursday which parroted Strzok's claims without challenge. Strzok, who displayed significant anti-Trump bias while playing a key role in the FBI's investigations related to Hillary Clinton's classified information on an illicit private email server and to unproven claims of Trump-Russia collusion, told the Times "that the Justice Department's inspector general found that political bias did not influence decision-making in the Russia investigation." The Times provided zero pushback or fact-checking on this incorrect assertion.

Attention

Israel is where Musk's free speech meets its limit

Recent revelations by Grok suggest anti-Zionist content is being massively suppressed.
Pro-Palestinian Activist
© Alex Wong / Getty ImagesActivists participate in a pro-Palestinian protest near the US Capitol on July 24, 2024 in Washington, DC.
X - formerly Twitter - and bullshit go back a long way.

Elon Musk, the owner of X - who also happens to be the world's richest oligarch, a major war contractor, a WEF-co-opted globalist wannabe "anti"-globalist, and a self-declared "free speech absolutist" - has claimed that his platform "strives to be the town square of the internet by promoting and protecting freedom of expression."

But that, alas, is entirely untrue. In reality, Musk is a man of strong opinions: Not merely an uber-capitalist, he is also a very right-wing libertarian full of odd anxieties strong enough to produce plenty of posts about Whites and their "civilization" disappearing and, when in a really good mood, a greeting that looks like a perfect imitation of a fascist salute. That would all be bad enough. But Musk has also taken to promoting people he personally likes politically and culturally, for instance those glorifying, lobbying and making excuses for Israel.

If this is a "town square," then it's one where you need a mic to be heard, and that mic is under the control of a biased and overbearing mayor and his buddies. Or, as Musk's own team has put it, X users have "freedom of speech but not of reach."

On the other hand, the platform also systematically suppressed whatever - and whoever - the owner does not like. Much - but by no means all - of this de facto censorship is imposed by what X itself has euphemistically described as "a more reasonable, proportionate and effective moderation process," that is, often by massive demotion (deboosting) rather than direct banning. If you say things that Musk, his ideological chums, his business partners and his financiers do not like, X is less likely to just kick you out - although that option is always there, too - than to quietly put you in a tight, soundproof box. You may think you are speaking to others, but X makes sure your voice reaches almost no one. Let freedom ring! But in silent mode, please.

Dollar

China hits US with economic counteroffensive after Maduro's abduction: Report

President Xi and President Maduro
© ReutersChina's President Xi Jinping and Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro • Great Hall of the People • Beijing, China • September 13, 2023
China has responded to the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the United States with coordinated economic force, delivering a direct blow to US power and signaling a decisive shift toward a multipolar world order, a report says.

China sharply condemned the January 3 abduction of Maduro and the violation of Venezuela's sovereignty, concluding that Washington was attempting to weaponize control over Venezuelan oil to curb China's presence in South America and obstruct its long-term development, the German-language service of Russian broadcaster RT said in a report.

According to the report, Beijing treated the aggression against Venezuela as an attack on the BRICS countries and on the very idea of a multipolar world, and within hours of the news of the kidnapping, President Xi Jinping convened an emergency meeting of the Politburo Standing Committee that lasted 120 minutes, with no public statements afterwards.