Best of the Web:


Eagle

Best of the Web: Cold War bombshell: Putin declassifies documents revealing that USSR wanted to join NATO in 1954 - Application was rejected

NATO map
NATO, the Atlantic Empire
A year after Stalin died in 1953 and a year before the Warsaw Pact was established in 1955, the Kremlin asked to join NATO, according to a secret file which President Vladimir Putin unveiled last night.

In a coup de théatre which will have Cold War historians breaking out in a sweat, Putin brandished what he described as a recently declassified 'note' from the Soviet government to Western leaders from 1954.

It stated that Moscow was "holding to its intention of entering negotiations on joining" NATO, formed five years earlier.

Putin used the ploy to answer a question on Russian reaction to possible NATO expansion into parts of the former USSR following George Bush's robust advocacy of potential NATO membership for all countries 'from the Baltic to the Black Sea'.

Comment: From day one, apparently, Putin has had the Powers That Be periodically 'breaking out in sweats'!

Again we see that the 'Cold War' was entirely of the West's making. The US needed the Cold War to cement its post-WW2 position as 'world government'.

Russia, or the USSR, were not allowed to join NATO because its influence would interfere with NATO's true purpose: to establish and maintain Western, specifically Anglo-American, global hegemony.

Note that the Warsaw Pact was only formed AFTER the USSR was refused, thus completely undermining the revisionist NATO history which justifies its original existence as necessary to counter a Soviet (really, a Russian) military threat to Europe.

Once NATO (Washington and London) refused Russian entry into NATO, the Russians realized NATO's true purpose, and after having only just survived the most titanic war in all history, Russia thus had no choice but to establish a counter-alliance.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose...


Eye 2

Best of the Web: Showing his fascist colors: Erdogan says democracy and freedom have absolutely no value in terrorist state Turkey

erdogan
© AFP/Getty ImagesTurkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan gestures as he delivers a speech during the mukhtars (local town government heads) meeting at the Presidential Complex in Ankara on March 16, 2016

Comment: Given Erdogan's frank admission below that he conforms to a fascist form of government, the EU leadership should get as far away from him as they possibly can instead of cozying up to him and paying him billions to re-route Western terrorists help control the refugee crisis. The West proclaims to represent freedom and democracy, but if they continue to support a country that not only openly denounces those values but also aids and abets terrorists, they have absolutely no footing to lecture Russia about anything.


The President of Turkey has said democracy and freedom have "absolutely no value" in the country after calling for journalists, lawyers and politicians to be prosecuted as terrorists.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan spoke on Wednesday as almost 50 people, including activists and academics, were detained in a wave of police raids.

In a speech to local politicians in Ankara, he criticised critics raising concern over Turkey's record on "democracy, freedom and rule of law" as discussions over a landmark deal on the refugee crisis continue.
Turkish riot police use water cannon
Turkish riot police use water cannon and tear gas to disperse supporters at Zaman daily newspaper headquarters
Turkish riot police use water cannon and tear gas to disperse supporters at Zaman daily newspaper headquarters

"For us, these phrases have absolutely no value any longer," he said in the televised address, according to a translation by DPA. "Those who stand on our side in the fight against terrorism are our friend. Those on the opposite side, are our enemy."


Comment: Erdogan paraphrasing a well-known Dubya-ism is particularly apt, given their shared affection for fascism.


Snakes in Suits

Best of the Web: Pepe Escobar: The coup in Brazil is starting to reveal itself

people crossing street
© Paulo Whitaker / Reuters
As we approach High Noon in the savage Brazilian politico-economic western, here's what is at stake following my previous piece on RT.

For the past five days, all hell has broken loose. It started with judge Sergio Moro, the tropical Elliott Ness at the head of the two-year-old, 24-phase Car Wash corruption investigation, crudely manipulating an - illegal - phone tapping of a Lula-Dilma Rousseff conversation, which he duly leaked to corporate media and was instantly used as "proof" that Lula may be back in power as Chief of Staff because he's "afraid" of Elliott Ness.

As a crucial instance of the total information war currently at play in Brazil - with the hegemonic Globo media empire and the major newspapers salivating for a white coup/regime change more than ever - the shaky "proof" turbocharged the Rousseff impeachment drive to a whole new level.

Gold Seal

Best of the Web: Vladimir Putin's speech to Russian military serving in Syria

putin
© Artiom Korotaev/TASS
At a meeting in the Kremlin's St George Hall, Vladimir Putin presented state decorations to service personnel and defence industry specialists who distinguished themselves in the performance of special missions in the Syrian Arab Republic. More than 700 officers and men of the Aerospace Forces, the Ground Forces and the Navy attended the ceremony, along with representatives of the military-industrial complex.

President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Comrade officers, friends,

I would like to welcome you - all the service personnel who took part in the operation in Syria.

All of you - pilots, sailors, service personnel of control bodies, of special purpose units, intelligence, communication and procurement, military advisers - acted consistently and with precision.

Words of special gratitude go to the female service personnel. You serve alongside men, with persistence and dignity. Your choice in life brings you our deep respect.

Thank you all for your dedication to our Fatherland.

Russia is proud of you, of its soldiers and officers who protect the interests of their homeland with a great degree professionalism and courage.

Comment: Putin has laid it out there. He is pulling out troops, but he is not abandoning Syria. If anyone tries to undermine the work that has been done to stabilize the country, Russia will bring those attempts to a swift end. He is giving the West and their allies an out to save face, and a warning of what will happen should they persist in interfering with Syrian attempts at self-determination. The Syrian conflict has been a proving ground for Russian military capabilities and determination, and it would behoove the West to take notice.


Bad Guys

Best of the Web: The Syrian war in review: A look back at the US-NATO-Israeli sponsored "protest movement" and war of terror

Syria protests
© Washington PostProtests and preparations as Western powers stand on the brink of attacking Syria
The war on Syria started five years ago in Daraa on the 17th of March 2011. The following article first published in May 2011 examines the inception of the jihadist terrorist insurgency. It recounts the events of March 17-18, 2011 in Daraa, a small border town with Jordan.

Media reports have finally acknowledged that the so-called "protest movement" in Syria was instigated by Washington. This was known and documented from the very inception of the Syrian crisis in March 2011. It was not a protest movement, it was an armed insurgency integrated by US-Israeli and allied supported "jihadist" death squads.

From Day One, the Islamist "freedom fighters" were supported, trained and equipped by NATO and Turkey's High Command. According to Israeli intelligence sources (Debka, August14, 2011):
NATO headquarters in Brussels and the Turkish high command are meanwhile drawing up plans for their first military step in Syria, which is to arm the rebels with weapons for combating the tanks and helicopters spearheading the Assad regime's crackdown on dissent. ... NATO strategists are thinking more in terms of pouring large quantities of anti-tank and anti-air rockets, mortars and heavy machine guns into the protest centers for beating back the government armored forces. (DEBKAfile, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011)
This initiative, which was also supported by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, involved a process of organized recruitment of thousands of jihadist "freedom fighters", reminiscent of the enlistment of Mujahideen to wage the CIA's jihad (holy war) in the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war:
Also discussed in Brussels and Ankara, our sources report, is a campaign to enlist thousands of Muslim volunteers in Middle East countries and the Muslim world to fight alongside the Syrian rebels. The Turkish army would house these volunteers, train them and secure their passage into Syria. (Ibid, emphasis added)
These mercenaries were subsequently integrated into US and allied sponsored terrorist organizations including Al Nusrah and ISIS.

Comment: The covert war of terror waged by the United States et. al in Syria was being exposed right from the start five years ago. It had all the signs and footprints of being setup to become a collapsed state shattered through the Western use of terrorist mercenaries. The same tactics were being used during the same time in Libya, and we can see the deplorable outcome.

Enchanted by their propagandist media outlets, the American public didn't take notice of what was really happening in Syria. Russia stepped in to intervene and the so called press barely covered the incredible feats being accomplished. Russia made significant in-roads in destroying terror cells and infrastructure, and now it is ready to pull out the majority of their forces. And while this is still hardly a blip on the radar for the American people, Syria now has a chance at survival.


Question

Best of the Web: Pepe Escobar: Did the US and Russia make a bargain over Syria?

Syria
© Sputnik/ Iliya PitalevSyria. First day of truce
It's spy thriller stuff; no one is talking. But there are indications Russia would not announce a partial withdrawal from Syria right before the Geneva negotiations ramp up unless a grand bargain with Washington had been struck.

Some sort of bargain is in play, of which we still don't know the details; that's what the CIA itself is basically saying through their multiple US Think Tankland mouthpieces. And that's the real meaning hidden under a carefully timed Barack Obama interview that, although inviting suspension of disbelief, reads like a major policy change document.

Obama invests in proverbial whitewashing, now admitting US intel did not specifically identify the Bashar al-Assad government as responsible for the Ghouta chemical attack. And then there are nuggets, such as Ukraine seen as not a vital interest of the US - something that clashes head on with the Brzezinski doctrine. Or Saudi Arabia as freeloaders of US foreign policy - something that provoked a fierce response from former Osama bin Laden pal and Saudi intel supremo Prince Turki.

Light Saber

Best of the Web: Corporate elites blackout Bernie - insult to injury after stealing Democratic election

Bernie Sanders
© MIchael Dwyer/Associated PressDemocratic presidential candidate, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speaks during a town hall meeting at Nashua Community College in Nashua, N.H., Saturday, June 27, 2015
Tuesday night's US presidential primary election results were guaranteed weeks ago by a misinformation campaign, as early voting began in the key battleground states.

The outcome of Super Tuesday II, when US voters charged off to choose their nominee in the Republican and Democratic primary elections in five key battleground states, was already determined before the day began. That did not stop the pundits from setting the stage for an epic Sanders letdown following his improbable victory one week earlier in the Michigan race.

What pundits do not explain is that, in politics more than anything else, the process is what really matters. The process, the timeline, and early voting had decided the election long before the last voters trudged to the polls Tuesday evening.

Bullseye

Best of the Web: Stunning achievement: Putin saved Syria from Western-backed terrorists and regime change

children playing syria
© Rodi Said / ReutersSchool children play with a ball in a playground in Ras al-Ain city, Syria
Five years of war, five months of Russian military intervention, and now peace talks are underway. It's as simple as that.

However, rather than acknowledging a successful Russian mission, Western media outlets immediately began speculating that President Putin's surprise announcement to withdraw Russian forces from Syria indicates a "rift" between Moscow and Damascus.

This is just more of the same Western media weapon of mass distraction that has obscured the real nature of the five-year war.

The sovereignty of Syria is the central principle officially underpinning peace talks that resumed in Geneva this week. Without Russia's military intervention, Syria would not have the chance to pursue a political settlement on such solid footing.

By contrast, after nearly two years of US-led military intervention allegedly to "defeat terrorism", the Syrian state was on the brink of collapse from a largely foreign-backed terrorist assault. Until, that is, Russia intervened at the end of September last year.

Comment: The leaders of the Western world have repeatedly painted Russia and Putin as "aggressors", as enemies of the free world who are going around causing trouble. The reality is that Putin is saving the world from the real aggressors, the psychopathic leaders in the US and their lackeys in Europe who are hell-bent on maintaining their hegemonic control across the world. They are willing to destroy entire nations (Libya, Iraq, Syria) to further their sick, twisted needs for domination. That they then project all their inner desires and outward actions onto Putin and Russia is doubly despicable. Luckily for the majority of the world, he's demoralized their proxy terrorists and he's even fought to keep democracy alive in Syria by not allowing the removal of Assad from power to go forward. Who knows what the world would be like had Putin not stood up to the West and fought for humanity's best interests.


Magnify

Best of the Web: Europe getting increasingly desperate to save face as they stare at total failure in Ukraine

european foreign ministers
A trio of desperate Euro-frauds: French Foreign Minister Ayrault (left) Ukrainian Foreign Minister Klimkin (centre) and German Foreign Minister Steinmeier (right) in Kiev
As the political situation in Ukraine continues to deteriorate - with the government paralysed as a result of the power struggle between Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk - the Europeans are becoming increasingly desperate.

They are also becoming increasingly frustrated with the Ukrainians whose intransigence is prolonging the crisis. However the Europeans have no exit strategy and are staring at total failure.

The reason is the growing anger across Europe with the sanctions policy, and a growing sense that the diplomatic window for finding a face saving way to end the sanctions before European leverage completely runs out is closing fast.

The problem the Europeans have is that they have committed themselves to maintaining the sanctions against Russia until the terms of Minsk II are carried out.

When they did this the Europeans however failed to take the basic precaution of linking the lifting of the sanctions not just to Russian adherence to Minsk II but to Ukrainian adherence as well.

Gold Bar

Best of the Web: Money, power and oil: A closer look at Hillary's emails and the 'humanitarian intervention' in Libya

Hillary
© Eagle Bites
Critics have long questioned why violent intervention was necessary in Libya. Hillary Clinton's recently published emails confirm that it was less about protecting the people from a dictator than about money, banking, and preventing African economic sovereignty.

The brief visit of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to Libya in October 2011 was referred to by the media as a "victory lap."

"We came, we saw, he died!" she crowed in a CBS video interview on hearing of the capture and brutal murder of Libyan leader Muammar el-Qaddafi.But the victory lap, write Scott Shane and Jo Becker in the New York Times, was premature.

Libya was relegated to the back burner by the State Department, "as the country dissolved into chaos, leading to a civil war that would destabilize the region, fueling the refugee crisis in Europe and allowing the Islamic State to establish a Libyan haven that the United States is now desperately trying to contain."


US-NATO intervention was allegedly undertaken on humanitarian grounds, after reports of mass atrocities; but human rights organizations questioned the claims after finding a lack of evidence. Today, however, verifiable atrocities are occurring. As Dan Kovalik wrote in the Huffington Post, "the human rights situation in Libya is a disaster, as 'thousands of detainees [including children] languish in prisons without proper judicial review,' and 'kidnappings and targeted killings are rampant'."

Before 2011, Libya had achieved economic independence, with its own water, its own food, its own oil, its own money, and its own state-owned bank. It had arisen under Qaddafi from one of the poorest of countries to the richest in Africa. Education and medical treatment were free; having a home was considered a human right; and Libyans participated in an original system of local democracy. The country boasted the world's largest irrigation system, the Great Man-made River project, which brought water from the desert to the cities and coastal areas; and Qaddafi was embarking on a program to spread this model throughout Africa.

But that was before US-NATO forces bombed the irrigation system and wreaked havoc on the country. Today the situation is so dire that President Obama has asked his advisors to draw up options including a new military front in Libya, and the Defense Department is reportedly standing ready with "the full spectrum of military operations required."

The Secretary of State's victory lap was indeed premature, if what we're talking about is the officially stated goal of humanitarian intervention. But her newly-released emails reveal another agenda behind the Libyan war; and this one, it seems, was achieved.