"Displaying passport holders' sex at birth no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth — in both cases, the Government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment," the court wrote.
Judge Julia E. Kobick, a Biden appointee in Massachusetts, issued an order in June instructing the government to allow transgender-identifying citizens to choose their own sex designation.
The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to block the injunction in September, arguing that passports are "official government documents, addressed to foreign nations."
The lower court's "grant of class-wide relief enjoins enforcement of an Executive Branch policy with foreign affairs implications concerning a Government document," the Supreme Court wrote, finding the government likely to ultimately succeed.
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissented.

Comment: Of course they did.
"Absent an injunction, the plaintiffs and the classes of transgender Americans they represent are forced to make a difficult choice that no other Americans face: use gender-incongruent passports and risk harassment and bodily invasions, on the one hand, or avoid all activities (travel, opening a bank account, renting a car, starting a new job) that may require a passport, on the other," Jackson wrote. "The harm to these individuals from having to make that choice — before their legal challenges have even been resolved — is palpable."
President Donald Trump issued a day one executive order on gender ideology, which stated that passports should "accurately reflect the holder's sex." Under the Biden administration, the State Department announced that it would allow applicants to choose their own gender and offer passports with an "X" gender designation.
Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X that the ruling was the Department of Justice's "24th victory at the Supreme Court's emergency docket."
"Today's stay allows the government to require citizens to list their biological sex on their passport," Bondi wrote. "In other words: there are two sexes, and our attorneys will continue fighting for that simple truth."





duh...
how pathetic it is the "Supreme Court" of the land has to make a decision on this trivial bullshit, but take a look at the pictures of the ladies on the court and that pretty much explains the conundrum we find ourselves within - was a clusterfuck it all is when it takes a "supreme court" to judge the obvious.....it speaks to troubled times up and coming for the land when the court is forced to deal with issues ought not really be in contention.
duh...
~
For goodness sake - you be either a man or a women - and you come from what country? How the hell did SHE get on the Supreme Court?
What the hell is a "gender-Incongruent" passport lady?
And really - harm you say - you must be clueless...