OF THE
TIMES
The age of consent was 10-12 years old until 1920. So that's the direction people should go towards
mannerism
noun [ C ]
UK /ˈmæn.ər.ɪ.zəm/ US /ˈmæn.ɚ.ɪ.zəm/
something that a person does repeatedly with their face, hands, or voice, and that they may not realize they are doing:
He's got some very strange mannerisms.
We've spent so much time together that we've picked up each other's mannerisms.
Asking for a friendYou have friends? Now your making me laugh! The other basement dwellers on the MAP forum aren’t your friends dude they’re fellow freaks.
And what's the age range that makes one a pedo?That is something that is decided by our courts and legal system, right or wrong. My first love interest was when I was thirteen with an older girl in high school. Was she a pedo? Didn't feel like it at the time. When I think of pedo's, I think mostly of much younger, vulnerable children. But speaking for myself, I would never, and have never wanted to, touch someone who had not matured, both legally and most importantly, physically and emotionally. Sure, some people are 'ready to go' at a much younger age, but that does not make it right and taking advantage of someones youth and raging hormones makes me no better than one of my dogs....
LindaMay What do you mean my Canadian Sister?Reread my words Si.
Gator That new someone is definitely making an impression…
Whether it’s the right impression though, well I will let you be the judge on that one
Mcsnacks Mc snacks?!!! sbc
Little kids like McDonald's traditionally because the happy meals. There was a game call McKids. Mc snacks could be taken as a covert handle for someone who thinks kids are tasty little snacks.
Its an ironic name you have, to be arguing in favor of pedophilia. 18 is the age of consent, they can at that point marry a 100 year old if there's a reason they want to, like money.
People used to get married at 12 because life expectancy was in the 40 year range. Doesn't make it right.
An 18 or 19 year old who sleeps with a 16 year old is often times not even labeled a statutory rapist due to Romeo and Juliet laws.
Damn I hope you just have a stupid handle, are Scottish and like to bake cookies, or eat too much McDonald's.
Christian83 I called him out on his name, Mcsnacks, wait for the meltdown.sbc I'VE hated bullies n missioned pro-actively 'against them' since I am 7, 55 years of training. BE A MAN!!
Mcsnacks Ok well you carry on being better at it.juvenile
I find your comments abrasive, but then reading someone’s response is rather different to hearing it as you don’t get the nuance.
And I made a stand alone comment, YOU replied to me having never replied to me before and your comment although may have been written in what you thought was a civil argument didn’t come across like to me like that.
Mcsnacks I've dated many girls. The younger you go the more annoying they get with their knowledge of the world. But they all have their qualities. I think the youngest was 14 years younger than me. She was a Freshman cheerleader at a college but she read at a senior level. 🤣It seems obvious
The main thing about the pedo argument is that they get you to believe in something that has a very vague and arbitrary definition. But it makes it so they can then pass laws in the name of being able to stop the pedos or human traffickers but the laws won't do that and aren't meant to do that. They are meant to remove your rights and freedoms. Like they say they need to pass a law so it's legal to hack into pedophiles phone or computer without a search warrant but the law doesn't limit it to just pedos they instead broaden the term so that it will be applicable to everybody.
Because if they were really against pedophiles then they would make it illegal to marry a 12 year old in the US. But they don't do that because that's not their objective
[Link]The first data point should have you second guessing your 1.6% claim, and the 91% doesn't say the same thing that you claim above here.
-About 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 13 boys in the United States experience child sexual abuse.
-Someone known and trusted by the child or child’s family members, perpetrates 91% of child sexual abuse.
Mcsnacks That's not a defense. It's merely a fact. I do know how much facts are unwelcome here but...You have a terrible record of contributing factual inaccuracies here. You've likely contributed 40% of the factual inaccuracies in the comments recently.
[Link] FACT: The real prevalence of child sexual abuse is not known because so many victims do not disclose or report their abuse. Researchers have suggested rates varying from 1% to 35%. Most professionals in the field of abuse use rates from 8% to 20%. [...]
-Adult retrospective studies show that 1 in 4 women and 1 in 6 men were sexually abused before the age of 18 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006). This means there are more than 42 million adult survivors of child sexual abuse in the U.S.[...]
-Nearly 70% of all reported sexual assaults (including assaults on adults) occur to children ages 17 and under (Snyder, 2000).[...] Youths have higher rates of sexual assault victimization than adults. In 2000, the sexual assault victimization rate for youths 12 to 17 was 2.3 times higher than for adults (U.S. Dept. of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2000).
["FACT" 🙄]
[Link] Studies by David Finkelhor, Director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center, show that:You've got an opportunity to show what you know about "statistics". I'd like to hear if you can figure out why "1.6%" is incorrect, where was the mistake made? If you should choose to learn the lesson, I'll consider you may no longer be a sucker for statistics.
-1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse;
-Self-report studies show that 20% of adult females and 5-10% of adult males recall a childhood sexual assault or sexual abuse incident;
Mscnacks That means 91%now, for the second time, you're using that 91% with your made up context--I posted what it was referring to
you didn't go try and look up where that number comes from when I told you it's wrong--you're lazy, imprecise, and of course you trying to re-work the 91% into your false statistics gives us more of your GIGO:of the 1.6%
made up, fake statistics you've generated here, are we supposed to ignore your distortions and minimizing on this topic?or 1.47% are known by the person and .13% are strangers.
That 1 in 5 statistic is-1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse; as posted. Did you even read? Why even reply
is all abuse even looking at them lustfully. Mine is physical(sexual) abuse which is less common.Your abuses now include:
Mcsnacks [...] It's about truth [...]from you, that's a falsifiction.
azigzagidiot Again Your statistics are from Child sexual abuse that can be physical or non-physical. 90.6% of victims are maltreated by one or both parents. Child abuse reports involved 7.2 million children.The number I asked for just requires you to check a table in a .pdf, why oh why is that impossible for you? I wonder. You can scrape numbers from anywhere and paste with no context, but can't parse data off a .pdf... Hmm... Can't read english, or a .pdf. Hmm...
59,328 victims are sexually abused.
1086 victims of sex trafficking.
There's your exact numbers.
90.6% of victims are maltreated by one or both parents.bogus
1.6% of children from 12-17 are sexually abused.bogus.
Mcsnacks It's not the exact opposite. Do you see it happen in front of you? Or are you seeing it on the news?
Because here's how many it affects: 1.6% of children from 12-17 are sexually abused.
40% of the offenders are under the age of 17.
Most of the children abused under 17 are mentally or physically handicap.
The population has around 2% that are pedophiles. With about half of them being under the age of 17. So about 1% of the population is made of pedophiles over 18. And less than half of those act on it. So .05% of society is evil. And you think it's going to be normalized? GTFOH
LindaMay exact. ·Yeah those some exact facts and figures, LindaMay. We know you double checked. 😶🤡
The goal is a society that is guilty first and innocence must be proven.
Mcsnacks I'm defining it as the disorder when spelling it pedophile from the pedophilic which is a generalization. Because there are hebephile, ephebophiles,teleiophilesThere's the point...
and gerontophile depending on the age group of attractedness. That's a free lesson for you comet worshipper.
Mcsnacks ·3 days agoand there.SuspectNo it's not. You don't know the definition or the diagnosis. A pedophile is sexually attracted to only the pre-pubescent meaning usually under the age 10.
Christian83 Use two square brackets [ at the beginning and end of the name you want to use. No spaces. Include any capital letters if there are any and that should work mate.Thanks, now I know too.
Your opinion is not fact nor proof nor humble. It's emotional vomit, again rude as F. Stick yer take up your hindhole 🐊
Christian83 No need to apologize. Mcsnacks in my humble opinion was trolling for reactions. My take, we were all too kind !! It was exhausting reading all the bs he spewed….
I am proud to say that I found it out, and taught several here and it’s taken off! The very first person I summoned was the great RC!
I’m looking at this and thinking that in around 2m people there are 500 peadophiles.*
I wonder how many of these 500 are trannies?
Does this classify peado’s as a minority group? Because that’s a very scary, not to mention profoundly sick direction we are headed. They’re already calling this shit MAPS, which in itself is sick as it implies the perpetrator is the victim.
God? I’m ready for the asteroid now mate.
*My iPhone doesn’t recognise the word peadophile, it keeps correcting it to pea espirito lol. Says a lot about apple. Which has a questionable logo, the apple that Adam bit.