Society's Child
A board of elections worker secured the keys and told a Project Veritas journalist he was told "not to engage" with reporters who found the keys.
Philadelphia board of elections worker Kevin Richardson told PV, "I'm not in charge of knowing" why the keys were left unattended.
Project Veritas also caught a Pennsylvania election official telling an undercover reporter to "vote Democrat" in a polling location.
A Pennsylvania election official was caught on hidden camera telling a Project Veritas journalist to "vote Democrat" inside a polling location.
The official, Christie Yang, is the election board's Mandarin translator.
The exchange occurred inside the polling location at 609 Snyder Ave. in Philadelphia.
"I asked you to vote the Rep — I mean the Democrat down ballot," Yang told the undercover journalist. "Because we're trying to focus on, if the Democrats win, then at least they represent us."
Yang explained to the journalist how she chooses is to look down the line and go with all of the Democrats.
"I don't bother with Republicans, because they're the Trump people," Yang added. "But if you want the Democrat win, you must focus — if we all focus on Democrat, we can win."
Reader Comments
ive been watching the vote counts since tuesday night. most of the contests have gone in lockstep with the numbers, as if there was an algorithm deciding vote counts.
Most democrat leads are by 7-10k votes
Most republican leads are by 2k or less votes.
I have never seen an election where the numbers looked the same from state to state to state.
There have also been regular dumps of democrat votes where they are drastically behind then all the sudden they win 80-90% of every vote that came in.
NO republican vote dumps that i saw.
I even told my friends by text, "watch, there is going to be an at least 30k vote dump for Masto in Nevada. It happened. 39k votes, like 90% of all new votes that came in.
I am not a partisan person, i am unaffiliated. i can handle people winning and or losing, but pretty apparent cheating pisses me off.
How does corruption/selection work? Those running the selection show have to have some idea of how the percentages are going. They have to either control the percentages through an algorithm or they have to monitor the percentages and insert votes to manipulate the percentages.
In the case of New York, there is a video showing ALL percentages from the different Blue and Red counties were the same for Blue and different but the same for Red.
In the case of Georgia, there was a sudden dump of "ballots" for Warnock that shifted his line above Walker's. In the Georgia case, the runoff is already decided because the manipulators know the count that Walker received. Then it is easy to manipulate the outcome; warnock selected.
Was the massive lead for Desantis what should have happened elsewhere, or did the deep state also pump up his numbers to influence who becomes the 2024 nominee
Comment: The Post Millenial noted that this information came as "Philadelphia announced that there would be a delay in counting votes after reinstating a process to detect duplicate ballots."
For anyone interested in election fraud, the documentary '2000 Mules' is a must-watch! See also: