In a notice on its website, the Commission states "Today the European Commission is proposing to extend the EU Digital COVID Certificate by a year, until 30 June 2023."
It continues, "The COVID-19 virus continues to be prevalent in Europe and at this stage it is not possible to determine the impact of a possible increase in infections in the second half of 2022 or of the emergence of new variants."
"Extending the Regulation will ensure that travellers can continue using their EU Digital COVID Certificate when travelling in the EU where Member States maintain certain public health measures," the statements adds.
It continues, "The Commission is adopting the proposal today to make sure the European Parliament and the Council can conclude the legislative procedure in time before the current Regulation expires."
The move comes even as several countries, including Denmark, Norway, Italy, Sweden, France, in addition to non-EU countries such as Switzerland and England move to scrap restrictions including the vaccine passes.
The European Commission admits in its statement that it is up to the individual countries whether they carry on using the EU COVID vaccine passport scheme.
"The domestic use of EU Digital COVID Certificates remains a matter for Member States to decide, the statement notes, adding "The EU legislation on the EU Digital COVID Certificate neither prescribes nor prohibits the domestic use of EU Digital COVID Certificate (such as for access to events or restaurants)."
It also notes that "At the same time, where a Member State establishes a system of COVID-19 certificate for domestic purposes, it should continue to ensure that the EU Digital COVID Certificate is also fully accepted for those purposes. Beyond that, the Commission also encourages Member States to align their domestic validity periods with the validity period set at EU level for the purpose of travel."
As we reported in November, despite vaccine passport schemes and high vaccination rates in many of the countries affected, COVID cases across Europe continued to surge as winter kicked in.
In addition, a recent investigation by experts in Spain concluded that vaccine passports have no significant impact on reducing COVID-19 infection rates.
The findings are similar to evidence found by the UK government that vaccine passports could actually increase Covid rates in the country.
The Spanish study noted that the only positives of such a scheme are that it "warns people that there is still danger from the pandemic and encourages vaccination uptake among the reticent."
In other words, although vaccine passports have no discernible impact on their stated goal - reducing the spread of COVID-19 - they do succeed in keeping people fearful and compliant.
That conclusion dovetails with a recent admission by French Minister of Health Olivier Véran that the vaccine passports are "a disguised form of vaccination obligation," but are "more effective."
The Green Pass is only the first step towards an order in which the technocratic oligarchy, by connecting the digital identity to the current account, services, transport etc., and limiting access to them to those who do not obey, will be able to keep constant and widespread blackmail every single individual, reducing him to the condition of an animal in a cage, which will have to obey every directive of power in order to live.
It is the radicalization of 'organic solidarity' that Emile Durkheim spoke of, the obedience imposed by dependence on the system. But we go beyond obedience: how the 5G network can kill cancer cells by overheating them, so it can be used to suppress people who are unwanted because dissidents or unproductive.
This is not just a European problem. The ruling classes historically use, to maintain their power and their privileges, the tools that technology gradually makes available. Today, these tools are very powerful and capable of taking away from the dominated classes any space of freedom and law, as well as privacy, also acting from within the human body. They are able to make them completely manipulated by technocracy, but the people accept their introduction and become dependent on them because they receive initial benefits and do not consider the long-term effects.
Freedom has a cost, which is always convenient to pay because whoever does not have freedom is not the owner not only of his possessions, but not even of himself.
In a very efficient society because it is computerized and corporatized, efficiency is at the service not of the general population, but of those who manage the computer network and other control tools, who use these resources to control and manage the population for their own profit and detriment of it and its freedoms.
To remain free, therefore, it is necessary to bear a price in terms of lower efficiency by countering and banning all networks and tools suitable for this, all over the world.
To this end, the International Anti Orwellian Movement is founded as an international movement.
The Movement opposes and intends to prohibit, by law and by international treaty, in the most radical way and with the maximum penalties:
- all the practices with which humans are conditioned individually and collectively, on a physical or psychological level, by means of genetic, cybernetic, electronic, radionic, chemical, biological or other systems and by means of electromagnetic or acoustic waves and fields;
- those with which the production of conviction or consent is forced through propaganda hammering;
- or by taking advantage of the monopoly or oligopoly of information and entertainment.
The Movement also opposes and aims to prohibit and eliminate as above:
- all practices and situations of concentration and privation of information, education, research, monopoly, monopsony, cartel, whether perfect or imperfect;
- the subjecting of citizens, companies, public bodies to dependence on centralized distribution networks for goods or services;
- direct or indirect taxation of the use of electronic, accounting, endorsement and in any case non-material money; and any restriction on the use of material money, considering that bank money, intangible, can be removed from its owner or even cleared with a simple click;
- all mass collections of data on individuals and companies, as well as the traffic and transfer of such data;
- all practices of mass interception of communications, facial recognition, biometric, non-voluntary and free identification or biological analysis;
- any form of social credit (including the Chinese citizenship score), exclusion from rights, services and public and private businesses, through the imposition of badges or automated procedures or in any case in contrast with fundamental freedoms.