Science & Technology
Scientists from the University of Houston came up with a checklist for detecting mental health changes in isolated, confined, and extreme (ICE) environments, and asked people working on two Antarctic stations to self-report their mental state. They found that positive emotions declined over the months and as time went on participants were less likely to use strategies to boost their mood.
"The most marked alterations were observed for positive emotions such that we saw continuous declines from the start to the end of the mission, without evidence of a 'bounce-back effect' as participants were preparing to return home," explains Candice Alfano, a professor of psychology at Houston, whose team developed the Mental Health Checklist (MHCL) in a statement.
"Previous research both in space and in polar environments has focused almost exclusively on negative emotional states including anxiety and depressive symptoms, but positive emotions such as satisfaction, enthusiasm, and awe are essential features for thriving in high-pressure settings," she continues. "Both the use of savoring — purposely noticing, appreciating, and/or intensifying positive experiences and emotions — and reappraisal — changing the way one thinks about a situation — decreased during later mission months compared to baseline. These changes likely help explain observed declines in positive emotions over time."
Astronauts face a slew of challenges when it comes to mental health
Like the test subjects, astronauts who spend extended time in space face stressors such as isolation, confinement, lack of privacy, altered light-dark cycles, monotony, and separation from their families. At coastal and inland Antarctic stations, Alfano and her team tracked mental health symptoms across nine months, including the harshest winter months, using the MHCL. A monthly assessment also examined changes in physical complaints, biomarkers of stress such as cortisol, and the use of different emotion regulation strategies for increasing or decreasing certain emotions.
The researchers say that negative emotions increased across the study, but changes were more variable and predicted by physical complaints. Participants tended to use fewer effective strategies for regulating their positive emotions as their time at the stations increased.
Collectively, these results might suggest that while changes in negative emotions are shaped by an interaction of individual, interpersonal, and situational factors, declines in positive emotions are a more universal experience in ICE environments.
"We observed significant changes in psychological functioning, but patterns of change for specific aspects of mental health differed," adds Alfano. "Interventions and countermeasures aimed at enhancing positive emotions may, therefore, be critical in reducing psychological risk in extreme settings."
The findings are published in Acta Astronautica.
Reader Comments
File this under "sitting in a comfy chair can really rest your legs".
Found details of this experiment instead ... Does it reflect of modern society and the prospective joys of UBI and electronic money?
The Mouse "Utopia" Experiment That Turned Into An Apocalypse - [Link]
In this study, he took four breeding pairs of mice and placed them inside a "utopia". The environment was designed to eliminate problems that would lead to mortality in the wild. They could access limitless food via 16 food hoppers, accessed via tunnels, which would feed up to 25 mice at a time, as well as water bottles just above. Nesting material was provided. The weather was kept at 68°F (20°C), which for those of you who aren't mice is the perfect mouse temperature. The mice were chosen for their health, obtained from the National Institutes of Health breeding colony. Extreme precautions were taken to stop any disease from entering the universe.Sounds like our society has just reached the 2,200 equivalent of the mice population
As well as this, no predators were present in the utopia, which sort of stands to reason. It's not often something is described as a "utopia, but also there were lions there picking us all off one by one". The experiment began, and as you'd expect, the mice used the time that would usually be wasted in foraging for food and shelter for having excessive amounts of sexual intercourse. About every 55 days, the population doubled as the mice filled the most desirable space within the pen, where access to the food tunnels was of ease.
When the population hit 620, that slowed to doubling around every 145 days, as the mouse society began to hit problems. The mice split off into groups, and those that could not find a role in these groups found themselves with nowhere to go. Here, the "excess" could not emigrate, for there was nowhere else to go. The mice that found themselves with no social role to fill – there are only so many head mouse roles – became isolated.
"Males who failed withdrew physically and psychologically; they became very inactive and aggregated in large pools near the centre of the floor of the universe. From this point on they no longer initiated interaction with their established associates, nor did their behaviour elicit attack by territorial males," read the paper. "Even so, they became characterized by many wounds and much scar tissue as a result of attacks by other withdrawn males."
The withdrawn males would not respond during attacks, lying there immobile. Later on, they would attack others in the same pattern. The female counterparts of these isolated males withdrew as well. Some mice spent their days preening themselves, shunning mating, and never engaging in fighting. Due to this they had excellent fur coats, and were dubbed, somewhat disconcertingly, the "beautiful ones".
The breakdown of usual mouse behaviour wasn't just limited to the outsiders. The "alpha male" mice became extremely aggressive, attacking others with no motivation or gain for themselves, and regularly raped both males and females. Violent encounters sometimes ended in mouse-on-mouse cannibalism.
Despite – or perhaps because – their every need was being catered for, mothers would abandon their young or merely just forget about them entirely, leaving them to fend for themselves. The mother mice also became aggressive towards trespassers to their nests, with males that would normally fill this role banished to other parts of the utopia. This aggression spilled over, and the mothers would regularly kill their young. Infant mortality in some territories of the utopia reached 90 percent.
This was all during the first phase of the downfall of the "utopia". In the phase Calhoun termed the "second death", whatever young mice survived the attacks from their mothers and others would grow up around these unusual mouse behaviours. As a result, they never learned usual mice behaviours and many showed little or no interest in mating, preferring to eat and preen themselves, alone.
The population peaked at 2,200 – short of the actual 3,000-mouse capacity of the "universe" – and from there came the decline. Many of the mice weren't interested in breeding and retired to the upper decks of the enclosure, while the others formed into violent gangs below, which would regularly attack and cannibalize other groups as well as their own. The low birth rate and high infant mortality combined with the violence, and soon the entire colony was extinct. During the mousepocalypse, food remained ample, and their every need completely met.
So the conclusion I got from this is that any man made enclosed ideal society will not work. The only people who were better off, were the people conducting the experiment. I don't know, the whole experiment reminds of TPTB push for the NWO utopian society, where we are the mice and TPTB are the experimenters.
Reflecting on the above experiment, Incels, the Trans movement and mass abortions came to mind as our equivalent problems to the withdrawn men, the preening "beautiful ones" and "mothers would abandon their young or merely just forget about them entirely"
Do Polar bears 🐻❄️ 🐻❄️ bears live on the moon 🌙, no.
Do Polar bears 🐻❄️ 🐻❄ live in on Antarctica 😱 , no.
Why? Because both places are too remote, cold and hostile.
Mental health issues, you'd need to be verging on being Lady Gaga 🤪 to entertain going to these places in the first place.
Long periods of time in space can lead to declining mental healthEpidemiological observations.
Implying causality from such observations is pseudo-scientific.
Long periods of 'normal' life on present day earth can lead to declining mental health.
Particularly if you press a lot of fact- and information-filled idle buttons on your mobile device, steal a lot of things and then gab about how clever, scientific (and monumentally adaptive to change) we've all become.
Long periods of moral decay and persistent, guided psychosis.
Long periods.
Very long periods.
Quite long, in fact.
ned,
out
I would say we need a new surge in scientific productivity.
More lies to cover the current decay.
More idle buttons to enhance our knowledge of the Universe.
Happy New Year!
ned,
OUT
The vast amount of research on PEMF and peoples health is illuminating when considering the potential opposite of Being outside the field of the earth.. Large amounts of new information's is being brought forth regularly on space weather and its effects on our field strength which can be detrimental to health in all of us. I encourage all to take the 30 day suspiciousobservers YouTube channel. AS a scientist i was amazed on how much i was ig--- norant of when i began watching after a friend gave me the challenge. Our current state of the world can be at least in part be explained by wide spread disease as spreading disease is normally inhibited by electromagnetic charge to the cells. As our field strength decays into the reversal of the poles its only going to get worse.; rather then calling out theses ideas just take the challenge for intellectual curiosity and see if you agree. I receive nothing for this suggestion. I found it fascinating
I wouldn't even say that "ignorance" is restricted to the sciences, it applies to most things in life
People, especially the intellectual class, are conditioned to believe that absolute knowledge of a dogma or a narrative is the opposite to ignorance - but when that dogma is restricted to such narrow parameters or that narrative is so dedicated to a specific agenda, then should we really put such knowledge above all other forms of knowledge?
RC