Society's Child
Victims of the grooming gangs and their advocates blasted the public probe, which was launched in 2015 and has so far cost taxpayers £143 million, after it emerged it would not be examining any of the notorious cases in which 'Asian' gangs have preyed on thousands of mostly white, working class girls.
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) in England and Wales has so far looked at organisations like the Church of England and the Armed Forces to investigate "what went wrong and why" with regards to "institutional failure to protect children from abuse".
It was believed that the 'organised networks' section of the inquiry would look at the mostly Pakistani grooming gangs which have struck in towns across Britain including Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford and Telford, while police, social services and local councils turned a blind eye to the sexual abuse.
In two weeks of hearings for this investigation which took place from late September, the IICSA chose not to hear from grooming gang crime experts, victims of the phenomenon, or their advocates like whistleblower and former Greater Manchester Police (GMP) detective Maggie Oliver.
Instead, the probe looked at six areas of England and Wales — Bristol, Durham, St Helens, Swansea, Tower Hamlets and Warwickshire "because they represent a range of sizes, demographics and institutional practices", according to the Times.
None of these regions has seen a major prosecution involving South Asian grooming gangs, noted the newspaper, reporting that the proportion of the population from Pakistani backgrounds in these areas is lower than the average in England and Wales.
Oliver, who quit GMP in 2012 in order to expose the grooming scandal in Rochdale and has since launched the Maggie Oliver Foundation providing support, therapy and legal advice to survivors of child sexual abuse, disclosed that she was denied the chance to speak at the inquiry.
Speaking on the ITV talk show Loose Women, the former detective said she "repeatedly" requested the opportunity to give evidence at the investigation and was eventually invited to give a witness statement, but two thirds of this was erased by the IICSA.
"Every non-institutional core participant was denied permission to speak in public in the inquiry," she said, reporting that "forty pages of my statement were deleted, all the statements were hidden behind numbers and symbols on the website."
"You would imagine with a problem identified in the northern towns and cities like Rotherham and Rochdale and Middlesbrough and Halifax, you would have one of those towns included in a public inquiry looking at grooming gangs," she said, adding that: "Not one was included. So we had an area like Swansea, St Helens, Warwickshire."
"There is a massive imbalance in the witnesses, or the participants that have been called, and it meant that the vast majority of the time was being given to those organisations who have failed and still failing victims and survivors of child sexual exploitation and grooming gangs," the Manchester Evening News reported her saying..
"This isn't a historical problem, it is going on in every town and city in the north of England," Oliver stressed. "Even now, even today and I have information from this weekend. This is not a historical problem.
"This is another attempt to silence those with an alternative viewpoint based on fact and knowledge... The establishment don't want to hear that truth, they peddle out the same platitudes... They always say these are historical failures.
"These are not historical failures. These are current failures, that every single day children are being groomed by gangs of predatory men," she said, asserting a belief that authorities' unwillingness to investigate the issue could be "linked to the racial or the religious aspect of it".
Other figures unimpressed by the inquiry's focus include Sarah Champion, the Rotherham MP fired from Labour's front benches for highlighting the problem of Pakistani rape gangs, and Rotherham victim Sammy Woodhouse.
"If you are going to get to the root of gang-related child sexual exploitation you need to go right to the heart of it," Woodhouse said, blasting the statutory inquiry for being "selective in what they decide to look at".
"They are trying to bury what happened in places like Rotherham and Rochdale because they're scared of being called racist," stated the campaigner, who has previously described herself as "just one of dozens of girls... exploited and viewed as white trash" by drug dealer Arshid Hussain and his associates.
According to the Times, Henrietta Hill QC told the hearing on its opening day that the inquiry "carefully considered the extent to which, if at all, it should focus on areas such as Rochdale, Rotherham and Oxford, all of which have attracted public attention".
But the IICSA decided, according to Hill, that it would be better for the investigation to instead focus on "different areas, not least because it was intended that this was a forward-looking investigation building on analysis that's already been done".
"The two weeks of oral evidence was dominated by the questioning of institutional representatives from the six areas about their safeguarding practices in relation to child exploitation by organised network," the Times said..
Research by the think tank Quilliam revealed that Muslim men from South Asian backgrounds accounted for 84 per cent of gang members involved in child sexual exploitation.
But critics, including writers in Britain's highest circulation daily newspaper, have slammed "bleating" over the problem of Muslim rape gangs, claiming that talking about the issue distracts from "important discussions" around topics like "Islamophobia", as Breitbart London reported earlier this year.
Comment: See also:
- Political correctness gone too far? Grooming gangs and indifferent UK police
- Muslim ringleader of UK child sex-grooming gang released from prison 17 years early
- UK: Grooming gang victim raped by more than 100 men but police arrested her first
- Grooming gang protested by Tommy Robinson gets 221 years of jail time
- Grooming gangs: 'Cultural drivers' to be probed in new child exploitation inquiry, says Sajid Javid
- Technically, he broke the law, but is Tommy Robinson really in prison because he drew attention to 'grooming gangs'?
Reader Comments
Just wondering ...
"These are not historical failures. These are current failures, that every single day children are being groomed by gangs of predatory men," she said, asserting a belief that authorities' unwillingness to investigate the issue could be "linked to the racial or the religious aspect of it".I think this particular cop out (literally) might be traced back to the Pedo Protection League deciding they could pull yet another one, this time on the basis of being all-woked-up.
Nobody has ever accused the British of being against racism (lol) so the whole idea is a farce of the highest order. However the racists will eat it up and be deflected from the bigger issue (institutional pedophile elite subculture in the UK) and race baited to chase after their fit-to-purpose lackeys who are, unsurprisingly, Israel's brown muslim boogeymen. I'm sure the Disciples of Jimmy Saville shed bitter tears when they throw some scummy immigrant Pakistanis under the bus
Turns out that racism and fake anti-racism is an ace in the hole when it comes to distracting racists from larger truths.
I agree with you that without the pedo-elite, this problem wouldn't exist in the first place, it might not be directly associated as you seem to say, but by their corrupt actions they have had a big hand in creating this situation.
It is not a UK problem, but wherever Muslims are in high enough numbers, or just look at Oulu Finland grooming scandal. The few refugees that were there managed to have a grooming gang of young finnish girls. This made headlines because it is Finland, but this happens all the time in Netherlands, Sweden, Germany etc. Moroccans, Somalis, Afghans, Pakistanis, Arabs, does not seem to matter. They have very similar modus operandi, and it certainly doesn't need to be a 'crime gang' that is doing it. Like I said it is a cultural problem that is very widespread with these communities, especially made possible since they are usually active on social media.
Governments are certainly allowing it to happen, and in some cases facilitating it indirectly by "integration initiatives" or whatever.
There is a great evil that is behind so much of what the West has become, and it is not the muslim boogeymen, they are just a symptom.
It is a result of this fusion: Islam, western degeneracy and our corrupt governments
Is it not obvious?
This is a statement from an Imam in Norway, just because it is the first thing I remembered now
"Women without a veil is like slaughter, anyone can perform a quality check, even a granddad at 80"
"Women without a veil is like a house without curtains, it is either for rent or hire"
I know it is just an example and cherry picking, but if someone is really interested I can make a blog post or something to prove without a shadow of doubt that the Muslim culture in Europe, in this 'fusion', is very disgusting.
It manifests a little different in his grand kids, since the imam is more old school, but these 'values' of non-Muslim women are still there, even though it gets more complecated the more integrated in western culture they are.
"Women without a veil is like a house without curtains, it is either for rent or hire"And if that's their thought process, it's not at all surprising this goes on. It almost sounds logical enough to make sense, even though I definitely disagree with it.
I do not think this is a cultural issue for Muslims any more than Jimmy Saville is representative off my culture. This is a political issue. Western societies are governed by international crime syndicates, so naturally they help each other. Imagine if two people applied for asylum in the US: one a part-time terrorist who aided the CIA in organizing a coup in Honduras in order to overthrow the government, or the other guy who is a plumber on the run from violence from a coup in Honduras? Who would get the asylum? I think the answer is obvious.
And I think it is also obvious that the UK would also cultivate ratlines with the sort of criminal class that help them achieve their foreign policy objectives, which are identical to the US and Israel. So that would be a mafia class in Muslim societies. You let in 100 refugees and immigrants and 20 of those are mafia, because that is who the UK ruling class deal with. Those 20 guys were pimps and human traffickers who helped the British smuggle weapons to mercenaries, for example. They are repaid with asylum and allowed to set up shop in the UK while the authorities look the other way. I think this is pretty simple to understand.
I once met a "refugee" from Iran in the US. It was just an older man wearing a Rolex with whiny and kind of nutty wife who said that she was a victim of religious discrimination and that people were mean to her in Iran. But they already had two kids in university in the US somehow. They drove off in a Mercedes.
I do think this is allowed because it will sow hatred towards Muslims, which we know who benefits from. We would not hate Muslims without what is happening now. But you shouldn't evade what the Muslims are doing just because they are a tool of zionists and globalists.
We are talking millions of refugees here, of course not all have been mercenaries for the west, so it is indeed a cultural problem that goes way beyond what you are saying, yet what you are saying is entirely correct.
I can't imagine why... or could it be . . . Satan??? No? . . .How about . . . PC? There it is.
R.C.