
© University of Arkansas
A team of University of Arkansas physicists has successfully developed a circuit capable of capturing graphene's thermal motion and converting it into an electrical current.
"An energy-harvesting circuit based on graphene could be incorporated into a chip to provide clean, limitless, low-voltage power for small devices or sensors," said Paul Thibado, professor of physics and lead researcher in the discovery.
The findings, published in the journal
Physical Review E, are proof of a theory the physicists developed at the U of A three years ago that freestanding graphene โ a single layer of carbon atoms โ ripples and buckles in a way that holds promise for energy harvesting.
The idea of harvesting energy from graphene is controversial because it refutes physicist Richard Feynman's well-known assertion that the thermal motion of atoms, known as Brownian motion, cannot do work.
Thibado's team found that at room temperature the thermal motion of graphene does in fact induce an alternating current (AC) in a circuit, an achievement thought to be impossible.
In the 1950s, physicist Lรฉon Brillouin published a landmark paper refuting the idea that adding a single diode, a one-way electrical gate, to a circuit is the solution to harvesting energy from Brownian motion. Knowing this, Thibado's group built their circuit with two diodes for converting AC into a
direct current (DC). With the diodes in opposition allowing the current to flow both ways, they provide separate paths through the circuit, producing a pulsing DC current that performs work on a load resistor.
Additionally, they discovered that their design increased the amount of power delivered. "We also found that the on-off, switch-like behavior of the diodes actually amplifies the power delivered, rather than reducing it, as previously thought," said Thibado. "The rate of change in resistance provided by the diodes adds an extra factor to the power."The team used a relatively new field of physics to prove the diodes increased the circuit's power. "In proving this power enhancement, we drew from the emergent field of stochastic thermodynamics and extended the nearly century-old, celebrated theory of Nyquist," said coauthor Pradeep Kumar, associate professor of physics and coauthor.
According to Kumar, the graphene and circuit share a symbiotic relationship. Though the thermal environment is performing work on the load resistor, the graphene and circuit are at the same temperature and heat does not flow between the two.
That's an important distinction, said Thibado, because a temperature difference between the graphene and circuit, in a circuit producing power, would contradict the second law of thermodynamics. "This means that the second law of thermodynamics is not violated, nor is there any need to argue that 'Maxwell's Demon' is separating hot and cold electrons," Thibado said.
The team also discovered that the relatively slow motion of graphene induces current in the circuit at low frequencies, which is important from a technological perspective because electronics function more efficiently at lower frequencies."People may think that current flowing in a resistor causes it to heat up, but the Brownian current does not. In fact, if no current was flowing, the resistor would cool down," Thibado explained. "What we did was reroute the current in the circuit and transform it into something useful."
The team's next objective is to determine if the DC current can be stored in a capacitor for later use, a goal that requires miniaturizing the circuit and patterning it on a silicon wafer, or chip. If millions of these tiny
circuits could be built on a 1-millimeter by 1-millimeter chip, they could serve as a low-
power battery replacement.
Reader Comments
I expect that these guys believe that such funding is worth the future embarrassment when some REAL physicists once again show that claims of having invented a source of "clean, limitless power" is entirely equivalent to claims of having invented a classical "perpetual motion machine".
As described (and illustrated) the graphene sheet acts as a plate in a capacitor whose capacitance varies with distortions in the geometry of the graphene sheet. The varying capacitance would cause a noise signal to be overlaid on the DC output of the battery.
The circuit is similar to a "boost/buck" voltage converter that rectifies the noise signal.
But, without the battery, there would be no power to the graphene capacitor and no noise signal to rectify.
It does look like a classic "perpetual motion" device, but in this case, using electrons instead of marbles/ball-bearings...
So, do you think it is as presented? After reading your post, I've concluded that it is like they mythic "PM" machine.
Does that conclusion sound right? THANKS!
RC
Do natural magnets naturally weaken with time? Manmade ones? (Of course, I am not speaking of electromagnets which require external energy to work.)
Is there a half-life?
RC
The key thing to remember with magnets is that they exhibit hysteresis - both in terms of magnetization and demagnetization, with the hysteresis threshold typically being dependent on temperature. In the absence of physical shocks (which mimic the effect of heating), magnetic fields/forces below the hysteresis level have almost no effect, while anything above that level is usually catastrophic.
Some magnetic materials - such as Neodymium - are very hard to demagnetize without heating them close to their Curie temperature. Others such as the ALNICO magnets in vintage guitar pickups can potentially be neutralized, over time, simply by too much close proximity to a guitar speaker (which is often large, ceramic and VERY intense).
A magnet can be thought of as an aggregation of lots of tiny little magnets - each called a domain - which are mostly aligned with the overall field of the magnet.
Each time you use a magnet to "do work" by lifting or moving something, you are stressing the internal magnetic field, and there is a chance that some of the weaker domains will, as a result of the resistive forces, become overwhelmed and demagnetized.
Next, (I'm getting smarter here ) when you say "A magnet can be thought of as an aggregation of lots of tiny little magnets - each called a domain - " . . . well, I'm gonna guess that the more 'technical' term . . . is "magnet dot com"!
Right? right? . . . maybe?... umm...nevermind.
RC THANKS! RC
R.C.
-You could use this for driving micro-electronics placed on or under skin, powered by your own body heat. Good for things like active versions of those injectible RFID chips. The power generated is super small, but then so are the energy requirements of nanometer electronics.
Another competing approach, I gather, is simply harvesting existing EM smog (there sure is enough of it!).