Puppet Masters

Ukrainegate: 'I deserve to meet my accuser!' Trump demands 'whistleblower' and 'his source' to face him

RT
Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:13 UTC

US President Donald Trump has demanded to meet with the whistleblower who accused him of pressuring Kiev for political gain, as well as with the actual alleged source that passed the information presented in the Ukraine complaint.

With the Ukrainegate scandal gathering pace, Trump has launched another scathing attack at one of its main peddlers, House Intel Committee chair Adam Schiff, saying that he wants to see the Democratic Senator tried for treason for his parody interpretation of Trump's call with Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky.

"He wrote down and read terrible things, then said it was from the mouth of the President of the United States. I want Schiff questioned at the highest level for Fraud & Treason," Trump wrote as he went on a Twitter tirade on Sunday.

Doubling down on his call for Schiff to face legal repercussions for "lying to Congress," Trump has made a fresh demand, arguing that he, "like every American," has the right to meet his accuser, referring to the whistleblower behind the "urgent concern" compliant, that set the current impeachment inquiry in motion.

Trump's demand for a tete-a-tete with his "accuser", who was reported to be a CIA officer detailed to the Trump administration at certain point, comes amid reports that the whistleblower's lawyers penned a letter to Schiff and Senate Intel Committee chair Richard Burr (R-N.C.) expressing "serious concern" for their client's safety.

The whistleblower's legal team insists his identity should remain shrouded in secrecy, with lawyer Andrew Bakaj telling the Times earlier this week that "any decision" to report his identity would be "deeply concerning" and "can place the individual in harm's way."

In his complaint, the whistleblower said that his knowledge of the events surrounding the Trump's administration dealings with Ukraine comes mostly from third parties, admitting that he was not privy to the call between Zelensky and Trump, which was thrust into the center of the snowballing scandal.

Reader Comments

Servaline · 2019-09-30T20:40:46Z

Whistleblowers have a record of suiciding themselves.

Ruth · 2019-10-01T08:29:29Z

Servaline I don't think whoever this was, was a real whistle-blower - more like a leaker. Real whistle-blowers get 'taken out'. This one got a promotion.

[Link]

Joan · 2019-09-30T20:53:03Z

Personally, I think Trump has made a very valid argument. He does deserve to meet his accusers.

But with vague sources, no names, well it seem to me it was created in the ether, or in the minds that are so opposed to Trump that they are deranged and have such a pathological hate of Trump.

Because they live in a world of delusion, illusion and fantasy, they will never ever be able to produce a live, living breathing person.

Other than a concocted script.

ericendtimes · 2019-09-30T21:07:43Z

Very well said.Will be watching this as it unfolds.

Christian83 · 2019-09-30T22:11:06Z

Joan- I think you hit the nail on the head there, a very astute comment. I think the real reason they don’t want to reveal their identity is because then it will probably show it is a complete farce staged by the demotwats, they will stop at nothing to torpedo the trump administration because they know they are not going to win the 2020 election so can only steal it. They are getting desperate, from racist trump to Russiagate, when that failed it’s now Ukrainegate. I wonder what is next? Just look at there latest campaign promise to ban fracking nationwide 🤣

Something tells me the deplorables won’t fall for it, and will vote for trump again. I know I would, but I’m a deplorable as well so that figures 😎

Heart is All · 2019-10-01T01:12:33Z

Joan Yes-- agree. But wonder why there's a return to the Russian election "meddling" story and new sanctions as per normal ... Pelosi have anything to do with it? Trying to deflect attention from Biden ... back onto Russia ... again!

MaoriNinja · 2019-09-30T21:59:38Z

Vaguely recalled reading (on /pol, so not sure of validity) that the intelligence services changed their requirements for levelling accusations to allow them (whistleblowers) to do so WITHOUT first hand knowledge of the events. Further enquiry shows that the whistleblower had assistance from an entity within congress meaning forward knowledge of events and how they’re to played out for the public; it’s relevant because schiffs display in front of congress, at the hearing, is used as sound bites for the MSM to control the narrative on how this is received by the general public. It’s concerning if not blatantly corrupt and a glaring manipulation of governance. This will blow up in the dems face. Imo they’re playing the defamation game, opposed to winning on doing good things for their constituents. Nothing good can come of it; I expect it to get much worse before it gets better

Christian83 · 2019-09-30T22:18:43Z

Definitely get worse before it gets better. Or maybe just keep getting worse knowing the democrats. Thanks for the information regarding the requirements

MaoriNinja · 2019-09-30T22:27:30Z

Cool bro - not 100% on veracity, so warrants further investigation; but worth mentioning. Wait till the DoD audit results come out around navy contracts and PaR systems...

Christian83 · 2019-09-30T23:05:38Z

MaoriNinja - I shall definitely have a look around and see what I find out. Thanks again! If I find anything of interest I will try to provide a link.

It will be interesting to hear the results from the audit that’s for sure.

MaoriNinja · 2019-09-30T22:20:19Z

Whistleblower = Alexandra Chalupa. She is a Ukrainian America CIA spook. She was responsible for getting Paul Manafort charged and arrested. She is also responsible for gaining second hand information from the Trump-Ukraine call from White House insiders. Alexandra was not in the White House, but she only received second hand information.

Quite ironic considering this is second hand info!

Rowan Cocoan · 2019-10-01T13:44:03Z

MaoriNinja Chalupa???? Wow! I had those at Taco Bell!

Honesly though, one time I drove through TB, @ about 2.45a.m. and asked the guy through the speaker machine, "It seems to me that what you call a Chalupa is you just take an old gordita someone didn't buy, getting stale, whatever, & throw it in the deep fryer. Is that right?"

He replied "Well I could say that, but I'm not supposed to!" TRUTH! I ordered a fresh gordita.

R.C.

Rowan Cocoan · 2019-10-01T13:45:24Z

Rowan Cocoan A sense of humor is where you find it. R.C.

Rowan Cocoan · 2019-09-30T22:23:15Z

This is the deep state taking an opportune moment to rid themselves with someone who is at least 'slowing down' their plans, without having to resort to 'extreme prejudice' which was JFK, or, for a similar without prejudice (theory) try Silent Coup by Colodny re Nixon.*

Watch for some new 'golden haired boy Republican declare his candidacy.

R.C.

*Who REALLY was a limited hang out because he and Bush I were LBJ's water boys (or he was theirs) and Nixon was neck deep.

RC

AmandaMay · 2019-10-01T01:08:05Z

It's a CIA coup

Ron Paul Asks: "Impeachment... Or CIA Coup?" [Link]
Dr. Steve Pieczenik

OPUS 175 CIA attempted Coup

[Link] (tells Trump it's his job to start firing CIA)

Dr Pieczenik

OPUS 176 CIA Coup CONFIRMED [Link]
(What does the CIA need for a coup? Some compromised people in power...like Adam Schiff--Pieczenik says Schiff is compromised b/c he took $$$$ from a Ukranian arms dealer Pasternak, and Pieczenik says Schiff is compromised b/c he got caught in pedophile ring!!!!)

@MaoriNinja- Yes, they changed the form--the old form used to require FIRST HAND knowledge, so they changed it to allow for hearsay

Rowan Cocoan · 2019-10-01T01:11:06Z

AmandaMay Great links! Here's the ron Paul Direct link: [Link]
I take it you read WRH. Good!

R.C.

Reecus · 2019-10-01T12:35:26Z

I think we are just watching political theatre that is designed to keep us divided and supporting one side or the other.

It's an incredibly effective strategy but I believe that we are getting close to a critical mass of people who can see through the charade.

United we win!