The complaint alleges Lockheed paid more than $1 million to Mission Support Alliance executives in order to win a $232 million subcontract for providing management and technology support at the Hanford, Washington site from 2010 through the middle of 2016 at inflated rates.
It also says the defendants lied about the amount of profit included in Lockheed's billing rates.
A Lockheed Martin spokeswoman denied the allegations, saying the company "rejects the suggestion that the corporation or its executives engaged in any wrongdoing. Lockheed Martin will defend this matter vigorously."
At the time, MSA was owned by Lockheed Martin Integrated Technology LLC, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., and Centerra Group. It awarded the subcontract to Lockheed's technology group without competition, according to the Justice Department.
The large 586-square mile Hanford nuclear site in southern Washington, established during World War Two to produce plutonium, is considered the biggest environmental cleanup in U.S. history. It is administered by the Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency and the state of Washington.
Comment: This is standard operating procedure for Lockheed, one of the biggest corporate welfare queens in the United States. Only this time, they got caught. Usually the revolving door of politicians-become-board-members shields them from exposure. It's the only way they're able to overbill taxpayers for projects that can be completed at a fraction of the cost from the private sector, and with better quality. If there's any plus side, it's the fact that what they produce is usually also crap, like the F-35.