Science & Technology
The beast, named Lisowicia bojani, looked something like a cross between rhinoceros and a turtle, weighing in at nine tons. The creature is a dicynodont, one of the first groups of animals to eat plants. It's also part of a broader group of creatures called synapsids, which includes the direct ancestors of mammals, making it something of a cousin to the earliest mammal ancestors, or proto-mammals. The most intriguing thing about the creature, however, is that it dates to the Late Triassic period about 201 to 240 million years ago when dinosaurs first began their reign. It was believed that by that period most other creatures had shrunk in size to hide from the giants, including dicynodonts, which maxed out at the size of a dog, but L. bojani shows that's not the case. The research appears in the journal Science.
Stephen Brusatte, a vertebrate paleontologist at the University of Edinburgh not involved in the study, tells George Dvorsky at Gizmodo that the find is a big deal.
"Before these giant bones were discovered, you would have been called crazy if you ever suggested there were giant, elephant-sized mammal cousins living alongside some of the very first dinosaurs," he says. "We used to think that after the end-Permian extinction [252 million years ago], when some 90-95 percent of all species went extinct, mammals and their relatives retreated to the shadows while dinosaurs rose up and grew to enormous sizes. That's the story I tell my students in my lectures. But this new discovery throws a wrench into that simple tale."
Since 2005, researchers have been pulling fossil bones out of a clay pit in Lisowice, Poland, and in 2008, they found a 22-inch dicynodont femur, which was their first hints that big animals were in the pit. The latest find included a considerably larger 31-inch femur, one of 1,000 bones uncovered during 11 years of fieldwork at the site. In total, reports John Wenz at Popular Mechanics, the team found about 70 percent of the animal's bones, giving them incredible insight into the beast.
Fossils found along with the 8.5-foot tall, 15-foot-long dicynodont indicate that it likely lived on a wide, flat riverside eating seed-ferns and early tree-like plants called Brachyphyllum. The team also found the fossils of tiny shrew-like proto-mammals that would have scurried below its feet and fossils from predatory dinosaurs in the same location.
The fossil raises lots of questions, and researchers aren't even sure if the animal they found is a fully grown since the bones didn't show signs of slowing growth, meaning there could be even larger specimen out there. It raises questions about why animals in this period grew so ginormous, and why the dinos eventually won out. "The discovery of Lisowicia changes our ideas about the latest history of dicynodonts, mammal Triassic relatives," co-author Tomasz Sulej of the Polish Academy of Sciences says in a press release. "It also raises far more questions about what really make them and dinosaurs so large."
One prevailing theory is that sauropods and other huge dinosaurs evolved their massive size to avoid getting eaten by carnivorous predators, something that may have been at play with L. bojani as well, reports Vogel at Science. The team hopes to look next in Russia and Ukraine to see if there is more evidence that other massive dicynodonts once walked the earth.
Reader Comments
Scientists naturally speculate on the distant past, using all the tidbits of data available from limited evidence. 'Popular' science news takes the tidbits and speculations and often weaves dramatic click-bait stories for consumers. Most scientists adhere to scientific methodology and are honest enough amend their old ideas each time more data becomes available.
No doubt, there's more to the theory of evolution not yet understood than the theory being 'wrong' for not staying in its initial simple tree design. The point is, yay, we found a new animal! and are eager to find its place in the scheme of things past.
The same with dinosaurs - we find in relatively big number only dinosaurs who existed for millions of years. Short-lived (as a species) forms are either very rare and unique finds, or not found at all. If you make a map of temporal resolution with finds, you'll see that there are often big gaps, like 5 million of years or more like was in case of Tyrannosaurus rex. In five millions years a space civilisation can appear and disappear without trace... The temporal resolution of finds is just very low.
If this critter lived in an isolated environment, it could be as big as it wanted to. But either it didn't last, or we would be finding more of it, or it was really nicely isolated.
Comment: There seems to be a relentless stream of recent discoveries throwing many of the mainstream theories of evolution into disarray: