OF THE
TIMES
Because we don’t launch satellites into Earth’s upper atmosphere. We only launch satellites into low earth orbit, etc. If we launch satellites into our upper atmosphere we would have more issues with those satellites colliding with airplanes and debris. So the balloons are able to be tracked without bringing more damage/pollution to our ecosystem and the data is easily retrieved.You have misunderstood. I wasnt suggesting putting a satalite at balloon altitudes. I get what you're saying and it's a plausible explanation. It just seems really low tech and analogue to launch a balloon to take pictures. A throwback to the 50s almost. Surely in this day it's easier to ping new coordinates, targets, camera focus to either one geostationary satalite or a number of satellites to do the job? Theres 1000s remember? What % have the capability im unsure.
You've been watching too much holywood and american TV. What do you think satellites are some sort of miracle? Maybe there are some satellites equipped with gear that can do this, but they probably belong to the military and they won't give it a bunch of scientists that are into clouds. And even if they had this satellite, it would probably be moving around too much to be useful and would be hindered by certain atmospheric conditions. This way they have something up there designed for their purpose, that does only that and is placed at the best possible spot to get the best and most reliable results. Does that put your mind at ease?You mean something like a satalite that can view and analyse clouds and weather. I thought we had plenty of these. Not exactly black budget stuff is it?
Comment: Reprising a SOTT article comment from 2011. It certainly seems prescient.