OF THE
TIMES
It seems those Ukrainian draft dodgers might have alternatives : [Link] “Putin can say: if Ukraine does not give you passports, then I will give...
If anyone still believes Trump will bring peace : [Link] The Trump campaign is preparing a bill to impose sanctions against countries that refuse...
Gosh, have they asked the boys if they are traumetized, of feel raped ?!?
As I recall, Van Halen wrote a song about this very issue way back in 1983... [Link]
One of my most favourite memories of living in the UK as a child was listening to Brass Bands. I lived in the North of England and they were...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
[Link]
June 1, 2009
The $65 billion Department of Housing and Urban Development has been plagued by mismanagement and scandal in recent decades. Numerous HUD secretaries have used their power to enrich themselves or to confer special benefits on people with political and financial connections. This essay looks at HUD mismanagement during the tenures of four HUD secretaries under three recent presidents:
•Samuel Pierce, 1981-1989, Ronald Reagan's only HUD secretary
•Henry Cisneros, 1993-1997, Bill Clinton's first HUD secretary
•Andrew Cuomo, 1997-2001, Bill Clinton's second HUD secretary
•Alphonso Jackson, 2003-2009, George W. Bush's second HUD secretary
HUD's history of scandal and corruption fits this pattern. While government officials and advocates for housing subsidies usually paint a romanticized portrait of HUD's programs, the truth is that federal housing intervention has often done far more damage than good. The housing and financial meltdowns of recent years can be partly traced to the distortions injected into markets by federal housing regulations and subsidies through HUD and other agencies. We have learned that when the government intervenes in the housing industry, politically driven decisions lead to corruption and economic distortion, not efficient public policies. The federal government should begin withdrawing from housing markets, including dismantling the Department of Housing and Urban Development
The whole article is interesting (linked above) and makes me wonder just who is behind this organization VetsVote
As Ruth pointed out
Then people had better hope that his staff are up to supporting him as a figure head.