Comment: This depends upon whether the hacking is into the NSA or out of the NSA.
"As my job is to penetrate other people's networks, complexity is my friend," he said. "The first time you update the software, you introduce vulnerabilities, or variables rather. It's a good place to be in a penetration point of view."
The potential of internet of things for global surveillance was pointed out earlier by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper during a February hearing at the Senate. He said interconnected devices could be useful "for identification, surveillance, monitoring, location tracking, and targeting for recruitment, or to gain access to networks or user credentials." Ledgett elaborated on the potential for malign hackers to take control of wirelessly connected biomedical devices, a scenario discussed by law enforcement and explored by the cybersecurity community. The popular TV series Homeland uses a hacker attack on a senior US official through his pacemaker as a plot device.
Comment: The above links support the theories that certain individuals were indeed murdered by remote control of their vehicles or biomedical devices.
The NSA is not in a position to mandate security standards for private companies, Ledgett said, but it also cannot ignore the threat as well. Once the agency has an employee with an internet-connected biomedical device, the issue would be of great concern, he added.






Comment: The NSA wants control of every person on the planet. Ha! Great concern! When has that ever stopped them? It is only of 'great concern' if their own employee is susceptible to hacking via a biomedical device. Remote intel-induced heart attack...untraceable online murder, anyone?