© en.wikipedia.org
When the Lusitania
left New York for Liverpool on what would be her final voyage on 1st May 1915, during the Great War, it would alter the course of history forever.Just a week later on 7
th May 1915, the
Lusitania was torpedoed and sunk by a German U-boat resulting in the loss of 1,198 lives of both passengers and crew off the southern coast of Ireland inside Germany's declared, but unrecognised "zone of war."
The sinking, without any prior search or warning, and with no regard for the safety of the passengers and crew, breached international law.
Germany produced the argument (unconvincingly) that the liner was itself breaching international law by carrying munitions, and through doing so, providing Germany with justification for the attack.Novel research conducted by Dr. Matthew Seligmann, Reader in History, at the Department of Politics, History and Law at Brunel University London, has unveiled new information on the incident. Dr. Seligmann has uncovered records that demonstrate that the
Lusitania, one of the two fastest and most luxurious British passenger liners built at the turn of the century, had a hidden purpose. It acted as a trade protection vessel against attacks on British merchant vessels by German commerce raiding auxiliary cruisers.
Funded by a British government loan and given a hefty annual subsidy from Admiralty funds, the
Lusitania was warship in all but name. This fact, he stresses, does not excuse Germany from the illegal sinking, as it was not serving as a commissioned warship at the time of the attack. On the contrary it had recognised civilian status and character.
"Cargo vessels are inevitably civilian vessels," he explained. "The Lusitania was built as a warship to protect British trade, as well as being a cargo ship, and a state-of-the-art luxury passenger liner.
"It was designed to mount guns and destroy German commerce raiders. Of course it was doing none of these when it was sunk, but that only makes the fact of its sinking all the more ironic."
He added: "All merchant vessels carry cargo and in 1915 the most likely cargo for a British merchant vessel was war materials.
The Lusitania in 1915 was sailing a civilian cargo and passenger vessel. Its cargo was munitions. That was legal, normal and ordinary. What was illegal was that the ship was sunk without warning."The argument the German's provided for sinking the
Lusitania and other cargo vessels bound for Britain, argues Dr. Seligmann, was to destroy the British economy "and starve us into submission. In exactly the same way, the reason the Royal Navy stopped cargo ships from reaching Germany with war supplies was to undermine the German economy. It did not sink them."
At this time America was not involved in the First World War, it was a European war at the time, and had no desire to be involved, but the loss of 128 American lives among the ship's casualties had the potential to alter American attitudes. British Naval Intelligence exploited the sinking for all its worth with a major propaganda campaign in America.
A crucial part of this was a commemorative medal. Designed and manufactured by a Munich craftsman, the medal appeared to depict the sinking of the great liner as a major German military triumph and celebrate the loss of life that accompanied it.
There was no concession to the fact that world opinion may view the attack on a civilian passenger vessel as an atrocity and a war crime. Accordingly, the British Government managed to smuggle out a copy out of Germany and arranged to have thousands of them pressed for distribution in the United States as a graphic illustration of German callousness.
However, it was only when Germany intensified its U-boat campaign to include US vessels that the Americans finally declared war on Germany in 1917.
Comment: In contravention of the rules of war at the time (the
Hague Conventions and the
Cruiser Rules) the
RMS Lusitania was carrying a considerable amount of ammunition, explosives, and other war materiel for the armies of England and France. Germans knew that
The Lusitania was carrying military supplies bound for Germany's enemies on the Western Front. The German embassy in Washington even took the precaution of placing an advertisement in 50 U.S. newspapers warning civilians not to sail on the
Lusitania.
Due to the intervention of the State Department most of the notices were not publishedThe sinking of the
Lusitania was a major catalyst for America's later entry into the World War. Total deaths from the War are estimated between 9 and 15 million souls; American casualties of dead and wounded were in excess of 300,000. But the House of Morgan, House of Rothschild, and other banksters were thoroughly pleased at America's entry into the War.
It meant that they continued to benefit hugely from the wholesale slaughter and misery of millions of programmed human beings. When one thinks of Pearl Harbour, Gulf of Tonkin, 9/11, and other false flags it seems that some things never change. The lessons of history are quickly forgotten. See:
Sinking the Lusitania: An act of mass murder by the banksters
passengers were sacrified to bring Amirica to WW1 ?
As now anyone who wants to discover the thruth about the Lusitania can easely find that it was carrying munitions and amican weapons to England, M. Seligmann tries to "noyer le poisson" (make a diversion) in inventing a new story, another lie may be.
The fact is, and Seligmann doesn't mention it, that the Germans had diffused in an american newspaper few weeks before to inform the possible passengers, that they would not let the Lusitania reach the british coasts because they new it carried war weapons and they considered that the USA violated the international laws. So the US government new he was sending his fellow people to death.