
© oneduffy
Let's get one thing straight: no doctor or nurse is going to sequester my children in an exam room and talk to them privately. Period. This public service announcement made necessary because of this sign, posted at the check-in counter of my doctor's office:
I was there last week for an appointment for Amy. She hurt her foot, which makes dancing difficult, so we had to get that checked out. Amy is 17; I asked if this policy was in effect and if so, how could I opt out. The receptionist told me it's a new law and there is no opting out. Working to keep my cool, I said, "I'm sure there is." She said, "No, there isn't." At which point I asked if I needed to leave and go to the urgent care center because I was not submitting my daughter to such a conversation.
That did not go over well
The receptionist closed the window. Almost immediately, the office manager turned the corner and said, "Mrs. Duffy, may I speak with you?"
She said there was a new policy that would allow a child to access his/her medical records online and the child would be allowed to block a parent from viewing the website. The nurse would also inform my children that the doctor's office is a safe place for them to receive information about STDs, HIV and birth control. That is what the nurse would be chatting about with my children without any pesky parental oversight.
I kindly informed her that no one would be talking with my children privately, and I needed to know how to opt out of this policy before bringing Amy back for her physical next month. (Yay for physicals! Amy is so excited.)
By this time, the doctor was ready to see Amy so I had to cut the conversation short because I was not letting my girl out of my eyesight or earshot. Not when it was clear that these people were angling to undermine my parental authority.
Does that sound a bit dramatic to you? It shouldn't. Because that is exactly what they are trying to do.
Make sure this is crystal clear: what they want to do is talk to your child about sex and drugs (maybe rock and roll - who knows?) without your input. Is it really such a stretch to imagine that a doctor who does not value abstinence before marriage would encourage your daughters - as young as 12! - to receive birth control? Is it really such a stretch to imagine a nurse telling a young boy - because a 12 year old boy is a BOY - that she will give him condoms so he can be "safe"? Is this what you want told to your children without the ability to filter the info through your world view?Should a doctor ever ask to speak to a child without a parent present? If he/she suspects abuse then of course. But short of evidence of abuse, a doctor should not need to speak to a child alone.
I am the Mom. I will pick who can talk to my kids about sex and drugs. And rock-n-roll for that matter.
Regardless what health care provider you choose, please know that no one has the right to remove you from your child's exam room. Perhaps if more of us stood up for our rights as parents, this ludicrous undermining of parental authority might end.
Reader Comments
Quote:
" Perhaps if more of us stood up for our rights as parents, this ludicrous undermining of parental authority might end."
Yeah right! And if we all could be bothered to read and become knowledgeable about... I don't know, say psychopathology/psychopathy, then we might actually begin to change things for the better. Most parents don't even know what they're doing half the time because when in doubt, they'll listen to the government, or tv, or the local "rag."
Norma Bates is that you?
But in all fairness the law is meant to give kids a safe alternative from parents like this who would deny their child basic sex and health education due to their own personal hangups and control issues. To many it's just another form of neglect.
But if the Mom is Bad, ignorant, negligent and overall bad for the health of the child, maybe this law then is better for the child in that case?
Laws have been on the books for decades to deal with abusive or neglectful parents. That is not the issue here.
This new law presumes that parents are "guilty" of not "correctly" rearing their children.
Forget the old-fashioned idea that children belong to their parents; the children now belong to the state. Forget the old-fashioned idea that doctors are agents of parents; doctors are now agents of the state.
I'm a childless 70-year-old bachelor, and I get it. What's wrong with you?
Great comment.
ned
a Babyfone to the kid and let her talk to the nurse while the mum is listening in...immediately if there is something suspicious going on then take the mum takes the kid away immediately...the only way against Totality is to beat them with FACTS...lets put together all the TRUTH and FACTS and see how to Psychopaths get out of that one....I recorded one Psychopath once (then not knowing what a Psychopath is) and recently saw what Manipulation method the was using....I am amazed I didnt see that before..The world is going down because of the Psychopaths and we need now then ever do anything to stop that..if its not already too late...educate as many as possible about what a Psychopath is (Video on Youtbe: Defense against the Psychopath) so that many people get aware of them...our only chance...
Again: Dont fight them but get as many Facts as possible...there is nothing they can do about Facts...
They hold the birth certificate (aka, title of ownership) they get to control the representative of that certificate.
Attention users: Genuine mother's milk is no longer advised.
In the brave new world of Corporate State Domination and Control and Modern Pharmaceutical Mental Science, 'Certified, Tested and Approved Mother's Milk of Amnesia'--sold in bottles and cans; available with sanitized and deodorized life-like latex nipples, easy pour spout, or the convenient and ready spray nozzle (if you're in a hurry); pasteurized, homogenized and vitamin fortified; many attractive colors and flavors--now rules.
Who needs breasts when the goal is making boobs?
BIG ONES.
ned