OF THE
TIMES
On a related note, and as I said already : [Link] The US is cutting support for NATO due to fears of a military clash with Russia The US lost a...
Well, kids, you see, anybody can be an academic professor these days. Just follow your greatest fantasies and sell them as word salad.
Its eerie to see how often the Supreme Court actually votes against justice.
There is something strange about this story... nowadays we have single moms slaving away on three jobs at a time for a pittance, while lazy...
The New York City Rent Guidelines Board voted 7-1 to freeze rents on about 1 million rent-stabilized apartments for up to two years, ... While...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE


I also wonder about their "recent discovery" of megalithic sites and other strange finds. It seems that similar to the diamond filled crater (that has the potential to disrupt the world diamond market) these finds are being released to the public strategically and obviously meant in a threatening manner. First Russia announced the find as just diamonds, then they deescalated by calling them "industrial diamonds". I see repeated examples of lightly veiled warning that more info will come if they feel threatened.
Which begs the question? What is so dangerous about further revelations on these megalithic and archeological sites?