OF THE
TIMES
I've had enough of someone else's propaganda. I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.
A tempest in a teapot. Who cares ? But hey, it's the NYP ...
Surely nanny states are not the way. But hey, here we are: Name a country that does not have this in some form or another.
'They Are The Dark; We Are the Light' The more we know, the closer we are to the end of tyranny by ELIZABETH NICKSON APR 28, 2024 [Link] . "This...
Both should be fired, but Jean-Pierre definitely. She is arrogant , ill-informed , and rude to reporters.
"Look him in the Eyes.....Nonsense. . how do I read that ? I read it as it written, as if it said, "look him in the eyes and tell him you really...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
"launching an ICBM with a conventional warhead might accidentally trigger a nuclear war"
Might trigger a nuclear war? Such an action WILL trigger a nuclear war.
The targeted country has no way of confirming whether an inflight ICBM carries a Nuke or not, until it detonates.
Therefore, according to it's defense policy, a counter-strike will be ordered prior to detonation.
There's no accidentally in the equation.
Even George Bush could figure out that Fast Strike is indistinguishable from First Strike, and that there was no advantage or reason to entertain it.