With perverse irony, the corruption and incompetence of private industry has actually furthered the cause of privatization, as the collapse of the financial markets has deprived state and local governments of necessary public funding, leading to an even greater call for private development.
As aptly expressed by a finance company chairman in 2008, "Desperate government is our best customer."
The following are a few consequences of this pro-privatization desperation:
1. We spend lifetimes developing community assets, then give them away to a corporation for lifetimes to come.
The infrastructure in our cities has been built up over many years with the sweat and planning of farsighted citizens. Yet the dropoff in tax revenues has prompted careless decisions to balance budgets with big giveaways of public assets that should belong to our children and grandchildren.
In Chicago, the Skyway tollroad was leased to a private company for 99 years, and, in a deal growing in infamy, the management of parking meters was sold to a Morgan Stanley group for 75 years. The proceeds have largely been spent.
The parking meter selloff led to a massive rate increase, while hurting small businesses whose potential customers are unwilling to pay the parking fees. Meanwhile, it has been estimated that the business partnership will make a profit of 80 cents per dollar of revenue, a profit margin larger than that of any of the top 100 companies in the nation.
Indiana has also succumbed to the shiny lure of money up front, selling control of a toll road for 75 years. Tolls have doubled over the first five years of the contract. Indianapolis sold off its parking meters for 50 years, for the bargain up-front price of $32 million.
Atlanta's 20-year contract with United Water Resources Inc. was canceled because of tainted water and poor service.
2. Insanity is repeating the same mistake over and over and expecting different results.
Numerous examples of failed or ineffective privatization schemes show us that hasty, unregulated initiatives simply don't work.
A Stanford University study "reveals in unmistakable terms that, in the aggregate, charter students are not faring as well as their traditional public school counterparts." A Department of Education study found that "On average, charter middle schools that hold lotteries are neither more nor less successful than traditional public schools in improving student achievement, behavior, and school progress."
Our private health care system has failed us. We have by far the most expensive system in the developed world. The cost of common surgeries is anywhere from three to ten times higher in the U.S. than in Great Britain, Canada, France, or Germany.
Studies show that private prisons perform poorly in numerous ways: prevention of intra-prison violence, jail conditions, rehabilitation efforts. The U.S. Department of Justice offered this appraisal: "There is no evidence showing that private prisons will have a dramatic impact on how prisons operate. The promises of 20-percent savings in operational costs have simply not materialized."
A 2009 analysis of water and sewer utilities by Food and Water Watch found that private companies charge up to 80 percent more for water and 100 percent more for sewer services. Various privatization abuses or failures occurred in California, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, and Rhode Island.
California's experiments with roadway privatization resulted in cost overruns, public outrage, and a bankruptcy; equally disastrous was the state's foray into electric power privatization.
Across industries and occupations, according to the Project on Government Oversight, the federal government paid billions more on private contractors than the amounts needed to pay public employees for the same services.
3. Facts about privatization are hidden from the public.
Experience shows that under certain conditions, with sufficient monitoring and competition and regulation, privatization can be effective. But too often vital information is kept from the public. The Illinois Public Interest Research Group noted that Chicago's parking meter debacle might have been avoided if the city had followed common-sense principles rather than rushing a no-bid contract through the city council.
Studies by both the Congressional Research Service and the Pepperdine Law Review came to the same conclusion: any attempt at privatization must ensure a means of public accountability. Too often this need is ignored.
The Arizona prison system is a prime example. For over 20 years the Department of Corrections avoided cost and quality reviews for its private prisons, then got around the problem by proposing a bill to eliminate the requirement for cost and quality reviews.
In Florida, abuses by the South Florida Preparatory Christian Academy went on for years without regulation or oversight, with hundreds of learning-disabled schoolchildren crammed into strip mall spaces where 20-something 'teachers' showed movies to pass the time.
In Philadelphia, an announcement of a $38 million charter school plan in May turned into a $139 million plan by July.
In Michigan, the low-income community of Muskegon Heights became the first American city to surrender its entire school district to a charter school company. Details of the contract with Mosaica were not available to the public for some time after the deal was made. But data from the Michigan Department of Education revealed that Mosaica performed better than only 13% of the schools in the state of Michigan.
Also in Michigan, an investigation of administrative salaries elicited this response from charter contractor National Heritage Academies: "As a private company, NHA does not provide information on salaries for its employees."
Education writer Danny Weil summarizes the charter school secrecy: "The fact is that most discussions of charters and vouchers are not done through legally mandated public hearings under law, but in back rooms or over expensive dinners, where business elites and Wall Street interests are the shot-callers in a secret parliament of moneyed interests."
Beyond prisons and schools, how many Americans know about the proposal for the privatization of Amtrak, which would, according to West Virginia Representative Nick Rahall, "cripple Main Street by auctioning off Amtrak's assets to Wall Street." Or the proposal to sell off the nation's air traffic control system? Or the sale of federal land in the west? Or the sale of the nation's gold reserves, an idea that an Obama administration official referred to as "one level of crazy away from selling Mount Rushmore"?
4. Privatizers have suggested that teachers and union members are communists.
Part of the grand delusion inflicted on American citizens is that public employees and union workers are greedy good-for-nothings, enjoying benefits that average private sector workers are denied. The implication, of course, is that low-wage jobs with meager benefits should be the standard for all wage-earners.
The myth is propagated through right-wing organizations with roots in the John Birch Society, one of whose founding members was Fred Koch, also the founder of Koch Industries. To them, public schools are socialist or communist. Explained Heartland Institute President Joseph Bast with regard to private school vouchers in 1997, "we have come to the conclusion that they are the only way to dismantle the current socialist regime."
But the facts show, first of all, that government and union workers are not overpaid. According to the Census Bureau, state and local government employees make up 14.5% of the U.S. workforce and receive 14.3% of the total compensation. Union members make up about 12% of the workforce, but their total pay amounts to just 9.5% of adjusted gross income as reported to the IRS.
The facts also strongly suggest that wage stability is fostered by the lower turnover rate and higher incidence of union membership in government. The supportive environment that right-wingers call 'socialism' helps to sustain living wages for millions of families. The private sector, on the other hand, is characterized by severe wage inequality. Whereas the average private sector salary is similar to that of a state or local government worker, the MEDIAN U.S. worker salary is almost $14,000 less, at $26,363. While corporate executives and financial workers (about one-half of 1% of the workforce) make multi-million dollar salaries, millions of private company workers toil as food servers, clerks, medical workers, and domestic help at below-average pay.
5. Privatization often creates an "incentive to fail."
Privatized services are structured for profit rather than for the general good. A by-product of the profit motive is that some people will lose out along the way, and parts of the societal structure will fail in order to benefit investors.
This is evident in the privatized prison system, which relies on a decreasing adherence to the law to ensure its own success. Corrections Corporation of America has offered to run the prison system in any state willing to guarantee that jails stay 90% full. "This is where it gets creepy," says Business Insider's Joe Weisenthal, "because as an investor you're pulling for scenarios where more people are put in jail."
The incentive to fail was also apparent in road privatization deals in California and Virginia, where 'non-compete' clauses prevented local municipalities from repairing any roads that might compete with a privatized tollroad. In Virginia, the tollway manager even demanded reimbursement from the state for excessive carpooling, which would cut into its profits.
The list goes on. The Chicago parking meter deal requires compensation if the city wishes to close a street for a parade. The Indiana tollroad deal demanded reimbursement when the state waived tolls for safety reasons during a flood.
Plans to privatize the Post Office have created a massive incentive to fail through the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, which requires the USPS to pre-pay the health care benefits of all employees for the next 75 years, even those who aren't born yet. This outlandish requirement is causing a well-run public service to default on its loans for the first time.
Also set up to fail are students enrolled in for-profit colleges, which get up to 90 percent of their revenue from U.S. taxpayers. Less incentive remains for the schools after tuition is received, as evidenced by the fact that more than half of the students enrolled in these colleges in 2008-9 left without a degree or diploma.
And then we have our littler students, set up to fail by private school advocates in Wisconsin who argue that a requirement for playgrounds in new elementary schools "significantly limit[s] parent's educational choice in Milwaukee."
In too many cases, privatization means success for a few and failure for the community being served. Unless success can be defined as a corporate logo carved into the side of Mount Rushmore.
Paul Buchheit is a college teacher, an active member of US Uncut Chicago, founder and developer of social justice and educational websites (UsAgainstGreed.org, PayUpNow.org, RappingHistory.org), and the editor and main author of American Wars: Illusions and Realities (Clarity Press). He can be reached at paul@UsAgainstGreed.org.
Reader Comments
Oh, but you say the government isn't lowering rates here. Oh yeah, that's because our government has been catering to the health care industry. The one program that we have that isn't privatized health care, the VA system, has lower costs and overhead than other plans!
You want to know why electronics drop in price? COMPETITION . We don't have that in our health care system, we have companies that work together as a monopoly.
You want to know why lasik dropped in price? It's OPTIONAL and health care doesn't cover it, so people have to pay out of pocket... so as more doctors do it, there is more COMPETITION.
The problem with our system of private capital is that a lot of the key industries that we rely on are given perks, by spending the huge amounts they do on lobbying and campaigns. That is the bad part of government, when it CATERS TO BUSINESS.
Oh by the way, health care shouldn't be a FOR PROFIT business. If it were, who would want to insure those with diseases or multiple issues? Are you saying that health care for those people should be dropped in order to lower YOUR PRICE? If you believe that, wait until you are 60 and are shopping for health insurance, like my father was. You can pray and wait until 65, when you get GOVERNMENT medicare, LOL.
I think capitalism works when it comes to OPTIONAL goods that we don't NEED, but the stuff we need, has to be regulated or run by government (that follows regulations). Atlanta's water system did HORRIBLY when private industry ran it, because profits were put above service.
You do know that most MUNICIPALLY OWNED electrical utilities have LOWER rates and BETTER service than private utilities (even though they are regulated), right? By the way, they also make money for the municipality, which LOWERS TAXES for that area. Oh and the workers get BETTER benenfits, what a waste you think? But, do you know that most of the cost for electricity is due to fuel? So why do these utilities try to bust the unions, to save 10% on 20% of their total cost? LOL
What would you rather see, the stock holders get the money, pay back minimal capital gains taxes on profits, or all of the profit be REINVESTED to the people, providing more than those taxes mentioned above?
I want you to see that when they complain about taxes, the small business owners rarely get to see the reductions. You see, taxes are paid on PROFITS. A lot of small businesses barely break even!
This article is speaking about THIS TOPIC, so you tell me how is it garbage:
Do you know of a time when a private company took over a government service and did the following things?
-Lower costs
-Provide better service
-Not take tax breaks equal to the original tax cost
(private industry also gets tons of CORPORATE WELFARE aka, subsidies)
America is not europe. What works there doesn't copy and paste here. Our govt is waaaaaaay more dysfunctional and corrupt than damn near anywhere on earth. They are completely beholden to banking/financiers. If that changes we can talk about govt involvement but right now it's catastrophic.That's not to say europe doesn't have its own problems, as they blend their finances your starting to see the same problems arise there and all those govt sponsored perks their so used to are now on the chopping block.
the VA system, has lower costs and overhead than other plans
It is the United States government’s second largest department, after the United States Department of Defense.[1] With a total 2009 budget of about $87.6 billion. That is unsustainable. As it becomes more apparent that the US will default on its debt, the budget will be chopped and the VA along with social security and medicare will be on the line. The police state will be the last thing left they will fund. Massive govt programs are unsustainable and far better managed by the private sector. At one time health care costs were manageable and low, before the bankster run govt ruined it. Hell, you can't even put the health benefits of food on the package because the great managers at the FDA say it has to be licensed as a drug then.
You want to know why electronics drop in price? COMPETITION
Exactly. And if hospitals had to compete for your business, you'd hear things like; We're the safest hospital in town or We have the lowest rates for xrays in the county. That only benefits the consumer. Instead doctors and hospitals set their rates based on what medicare and medicaid bureaucrats say things are worth. No one undercuts it. Zero competition. In fact they usually charge more than what medicare pays so you have to have a supplemental insurance.
key industries that we rely on are given perks
Yeah, given perks by a corrupt self serving govt. A govt that you want to run your health care. Please govt, in between bombing some brown person in the middle east, tasering an elderly women here at home and running guns to drug cartels could you take time out to decide if my appendix needs removed? How bout they just give me my damn tax money and I'll pay for my own health care. But the unconstitutional IRS is another subject I suppose.
You want to know why lasik dropped in price? It's OPTIONAL and health care doesn't cover it, so people have to pay out of pocket... so as more doctors do it, there is more COMPETITION.
So by that logic more and more doctors are doing xrays these days, why doesn't that drop in price? More emergency rooms are giving stitches, shouldn't that price go down? No, all those things are covered by medicare, medicaid and govt regulated insurance so the price does nothing but increase.
I think capitalism works
Honestly, we don't even know what that is anymore. We have had a central banking cartel monopoly running things for so long there is hardly any real capitalism left. But that sure doesn't stop people from blaming it, all the while goerge soros smiles with glee.
MUNICIPALLY OWNED
Long as it's not the feds running it, it can have some chances at success. But as soon as some wealthy globalist sees a profit, he will use the power of lobbying govt to bend the municipality to his will and ruin what the people have enjoyed as a fair business. As sure as the sun will rise, it will happen eventually in this climate of corruption.
What would you rather see
I would rather see free market capitalism where consumer chioce and competition run the show, every show. I would like to see a ZERO income tax rate so small businesses and middle class people can prosper. I would like to see competing currencies so my income is not exposed by the federal reserve printing money out of thin air devaluing my assets and risking the entire global economy in the process.
Do you know of a time when a private company took over a government service
Do you know of a time when there was almost no govt services? Every single service the govt provides was done by private industry for in many cases hundreds of years. That does not mean GE, BoA, Citi, Monsanto or Goldmen Sachs. Megalithic companies are not private individuals, they are faces on the same govt coin. If you have a private company doing a job for you, they know if they don't do it right they will be fired. The govt will just have you elect a new boss, the same as the old boss and nothing changes course. (Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama)
private industry also gets tons of CORPORATE WELFARE aka, subsidies
No, monsanto and exxon's federal subsidies are not examples of private industy. If you think those types of business are sept entities from the fed govt I got some ocean front property to sell you somewhere dry...
The problem is that capitalism, as a system, operates on the simple basis of capital... ie, for the most part, money in our world. The real problem is that money as we know it, is controlled by the govt, which is controlled by 'special interests' from intel and military interests, to the banking and corporate interests, all beholded to the SG interest and on up the chain of command.
Our govt has therefore rarely run a program without these 'special interests' in mind, and usually gives away federal lands, mineral rights, access rights, etc for a fee. The whole system is corrupt, so the idea of private industry fixing things is fine and dandy if not for all that free candy the feds give away. Private industry can work as long as it is done with competition in a 'fair' marketplace, but that is next to nonexistent these days, and has been in the main industries for a very long time. You will always find govt front men working on behalf of these 'special interests' either before or after they serve time in office. It's a turnstile of corruption, a prostitution of the public's welfare that they choose not to see. That is the challenge of living here in Purgatory, and waking up to this reality is the cost each must pay to get an exit ticket.
History is full of this lesson. Most people mean to do well, but they get turned around by an education in greed, usually in the name of a 'better cause', which of course, is more hypocrisy added to the brew of a bitter situation, but that is the medicine of pain needed to heal the wounds of ignorance. Don't like it? Leave... just try to. Not easy is it?
The privatization to public and back again is just another control to ensure the public think paying more and more for the same services is fine. An article that states either is good or bad is probably very short sighted. It is interesting that co-operative approaches that provide real investment, ownership and financial security for the working class have been assigned to the bin. The downfall in the UK started when Building Societies were privatized and all the security of money protection by balancing with savings was destroyed for what we now know to be a very corrupt stock market investment approach. The stock market once could make poor people rich now it only makes rich people richer.
This article is horrible!!!!!! Govt involvement does NOTHING but raise costs and prices. Have you ever heard the saying, 'Good 'nuff for govt work'? There is a reason for that. When govt gets involved in the private sector, the large businesses get in bed with govt all raise their prices. Why? Because govt is picking up the bill, so they know they can. If govt is so great in the marketplace why in the hell is student loan debt so high? I mean by this article's twisted logic student loans should be getting smaller, but that isn't the case now is it? All you have to do is look at what happened to the housing market to see how bad govt involvement in the private sector is, that speaks for itself.
What about health care? Why are those costs rising thru the roof? I mean govt is involved neck deep in health care, shouldn't prices be dropping? This is probably the worst article I have ever seen on this site in YEARS of daily headline checking.
I don't have time to point out all of the socialist/communist bullshit flaws of this, but I'll give some examples. Electronics: No govt involvement, prices consistently drop. DVD players used to cost nearly $100 when they 1st came out. Now you can get one for about $30. Lazer eye surgery: Medicare does not cover this, insurance does not cover it, almost no govt involvement. When it 1st came out it was $3000 per eye, now it's down to $1500 for both eyes.
Bottomline: When markets are left alone it causes competition to generate sales. Competition in turn drives prices down as businesses compete for your money. It forces companies to come up with perks and extras to out-do each other, which only benefits the consumer. When govt gets involved they create govt sponsored monopolies who charge whatever they want, why? Because the taxpayer is going to get stuck with the bill.