OF THE
TIMES
What was it like out here when the soil could still sequester carbon? (Insert eye-roll here). Counterpunch perpetually panders to...
Egypt are being paid very handsomely to turn a blind eye
Never ever, carry "Tater Tots" in a pocket in your cargo pants...
Fingers crossed for a Mothra La Niña to offset the Godzilla devastation.
Nothing is an accident.
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS 🐁 and In·Site
Original content © 2002-2026 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE

"Researchers believe that the mass of sub-atomic particles they created approximates the state of the universe immediately after the Big Bang..."
believe?
approximates?
immediately after?
Big Bang?
They believe that the universe had a start.
They believe that the start was an explosion, which they call the "Big Bang."
They believe that they know what the infant universe was like.
They believe that they produced a condition kinda like the condition of the infant universe following the Big Bang which was the start of the universe.
That's what this article really says.