The correct response to this is out-rage - mass public outrage. Do not allow yourself to be cowed, that is precisely what they want.
.
Reader Comments
!!! lost for words, almost !!!
Absolute insanity. This, along with many other things, has got to stop !
Wake up, police state is here.
Absolute insanity. This, along with many other things, has got to stop !
Wake up, police state is here.
This is all based on lies
Of course this government push for full body scanners seriously intensified after the Christmas Day "underwear bomber" last year after the Flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit. Right?
But in a Congressional Hearing last January 27 it was revealed that the underwear bomber was being tracked and was ALLOWED to enter into the U.S.
Here's that part of the Congressional Hearing transcript:
REP. THOMPSON: Okay. So — all right. So he has a visa. So what does that do? In the process, does it revoke the visa? Does it —
MR. KENNEDY: We — as I mentioned in my statement, Mr. Chairman, if we unilaterally revoked a visa — and there was a case recently up — we have a request from a law enforcement agency to not revoke the visa. We came across information; we said this is a dangerous person. We were ready to revoke the visa. We then went to the community and said, should we revoke this visa? And one of the members — and we’d be glad to give you that out of — in private — said, please do not revoke this visa. We have eyes on this person. We are following this person who has the visa for the purpose of trying roll up an entire network, not just stop one person. So we will revoke the visa of any individual who is a threat to the United States, but we do take one preliminary step. We ask our law enforcement and intelligence community partners, do you have eyes on this person, and so you want us to let this person proceed under your surveillance so that you may potentially break a larger plot?
REP. THOMPSON: Well, I think that the point that I’m trying to get at is, is this just another box you’re checking, or is that some security value to add in that box, to the list?
MR. KENNEDY: The intelligence and law enforcement community tell us that they believe in certain cases that there’s a higher value of them following this person so they can find his or her co-conspirators and roll up an entire plot against the United States, rather than simply knock out one soldier in that effort.
---------------------------------------- ---------
Any questions?
Just for a source verification here is the link to the actual audio/video of this Congressional Hearing. The above verbal exchange starts at the 34:12 point into the meeting. LINK: [Link]
Of course this government push for full body scanners seriously intensified after the Christmas Day "underwear bomber" last year after the Flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit. Right?
But in a Congressional Hearing last January 27 it was revealed that the underwear bomber was being tracked and was ALLOWED to enter into the U.S.
Here's that part of the Congressional Hearing transcript:
REP. THOMPSON: Okay. So — all right. So he has a visa. So what does that do? In the process, does it revoke the visa? Does it —
MR. KENNEDY: We — as I mentioned in my statement, Mr. Chairman, if we unilaterally revoked a visa — and there was a case recently up — we have a request from a law enforcement agency to not revoke the visa. We came across information; we said this is a dangerous person. We were ready to revoke the visa. We then went to the community and said, should we revoke this visa? And one of the members — and we’d be glad to give you that out of — in private — said, please do not revoke this visa. We have eyes on this person. We are following this person who has the visa for the purpose of trying roll up an entire network, not just stop one person. So we will revoke the visa of any individual who is a threat to the United States, but we do take one preliminary step. We ask our law enforcement and intelligence community partners, do you have eyes on this person, and so you want us to let this person proceed under your surveillance so that you may potentially break a larger plot?
REP. THOMPSON: Well, I think that the point that I’m trying to get at is, is this just another box you’re checking, or is that some security value to add in that box, to the list?
MR. KENNEDY: The intelligence and law enforcement community tell us that they believe in certain cases that there’s a higher value of them following this person so they can find his or her co-conspirators and roll up an entire plot against the United States, rather than simply knock out one soldier in that effort.
---------------------------------------- ---------
Any questions?
Just for a source verification here is the link to the actual audio/video of this Congressional Hearing. The above verbal exchange starts at the 34:12 point into the meeting. LINK: [Link]
Opt Out
Stop flying. If it is at all reasonable temporally, take the train.
Hit the corporations in the pocket books.
The powers that be want you to stop travelling. Don't.
Just stop flying. When the airlines and airports are gasping for cash flow, trust me - there'll be movement.
This filth we call our elite only listens one way.
Hit 'em in the pocketbook. Stop flying. TAKE THE TRAIN.
Stop flying. If it is at all reasonable temporally, take the train.
Hit the corporations in the pocket books.
The powers that be want you to stop travelling. Don't.
Just stop flying. When the airlines and airports are gasping for cash flow, trust me - there'll be movement.
This filth we call our elite only listens one way.
Hit 'em in the pocketbook. Stop flying. TAKE THE TRAIN.
But the one thing that 'caught my ear' is the fact that TSA employees are some how able to AVOID the same types of 'security scruitiny' that they inflict on the rest of the public.... They also have access to secure areas. This spells disaster to me. It probably does to anyone who thinks that 9/11 was an inside job.
If they are going to cook up another false flag opperation, they'd better do it in a hurry before all their 'magical powers' start being taken away from them.