
© Boris Yaroslavtsev/Sputnik
May 9 is Victory Day - the day that Russia commemorates the tremendous sacrifice made by the people of the Soviet Union in the Great Patriotic War.
Many nationalities took part in the fight against the Nazis, but no single country shed anywhere near as much blood as the Soviet Union.
Overall, 27 million Soviet citizens lost their lives in the war. Yes, that's right: TWENTY-SEVEN MILLION. There's no typo.Yet today, for geopolitical reasons, the enormous contribution that the Soviet Union made to the defeat of Hitler's forces is being deliberately - and shamefully - downplayed by elites in the west.
Western leaders
boycott World War Two commemorative events held in Russia.
Anti-Russian neocon propagandists, whose voices dominate the media and whose books always get enthusiastic reviews and endorsements from fellow hawks,
equate Nazi Germany - the clear aggressor in World War Two - with the Soviet Union, the country that was fighting for its survival and which only wanted to be left alone.
Hollywood meanwhile relentlessly pushes the line that it was the US - and the western allies alone - who won the war.
Disgustingly, and quite scandalously, the deaths of 27 million people are being airbrushed out of history.This pernicious and morally repugnant New Cold War revisionism regarding World War Two and the role of Russia/the Soviet Union is more pervasive now than it was in the days when the Soviet Union still existed. I remember growing up in Britain in the 1970s at a time when anti-Russian neocons weren't writing the script.
The groundbreaking 26-episode 1973 Thames TV series
The World at War told the story of WW2 in a very fair way and did not seek to diminish the Soviet contribution. In the final episode, the programme's historical adviser, Noble Frankland - a director of the Imperial War Museum and decorated war veteran - dismissed the ludicrous assertion that after the war eastern European countries merely swapped one tyranny for another that was just as bad.
Comment: As of this posting, Duterte has a lead on his opponent. His success would demand and support a new geopolitical future, namely one not dictated by the US and its self-serving, unipolar agenda. Is Duterte a game changer? Will he be able to dodge whatever Washington throws at him? Because, most surely it will.