
Israeli police between the Dome of the Rock and al Aqsa Mosque in 2012.
The
current Palestinian protests, related to the shootings at Al-Aqsa compound in East Jerusalem over a week ago and subsequent Israeli altering of security arrangements at the site, could, as some Israeli analysts observe, "turn into an intifada in the blink of an eye." (Nir Hasson in
Haaretz).
The Israeli narrative here is that it is trying to prevent "terror" - referring to the shooting attack on July 14 by three Palestinian citizens of Israel on Israeli security forces, killing two Border Police officers on July 14th, with the attackers shot dead on scene. Prime Minister Netanyahu has
assured the world that "this is a measure to prevent the use of weapons on the Temple Mount, something that happened for the first time."
But it really depends whose weapons you are counting, and whether Israeli weapons count. And whose 'terror'. There is a problem in defining the event as terror, something that Israel's politicians from left to right are doing - see for example Labor's new leader Avi Gabbay, calling it a "vile terror attack" and the gunmen "despicable murderers". But as Gideon Levy
notes in
Haaretz,
"the shooting of two police officers on the Temple Mount has a motive, a reason and deep roots. But discussing them is considered treason and a justification of terror". Indeed, the gunmen were acting solely against security forces of an occupying power. That the Palestinians were citizens of Israel (over 2/3 of Palestinian citizens of Israel identify as Palestinians and not as 'Israeli Arabs,' as Israel defines them), does not change their affiliation as Palestinians,
and Israel's unilateral annexation of East Jerusalem does not change the fact that this annexation is considered null and void by international law.
Comment: Further reading: