Puppet MastersS

Bad Guys

Flashback Rod Rosenstein, wily Deep State operative? Meet the ex-Whitewater prosecutor whose memo led Trump to fire Comey

Rod Rosenstein
© J. Scott Applewhite/Associated PressRod Rosenstein during his confirmation hearing to be deputy attorney general.
Rod J. Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general who wrote the memo that led to Tuesday's firing of FBI Director James B. Comey, is no stranger to politically explosive cases.

In the 1990s, Rosenstein (pronounced Rosen-STINE) was on a team of prosecutors appointed by Kenneth Starr to investigate Bill and Hillary Clinton's "Whitewater" business dealings in Arkansas. In 2012, Attorney General Eric Holder tapped him to investigate national security leaks to news outlets, a response to heavy criticism of the Obama administration by congressional Republicans.

Rosenstein is one of those rare career prosecutors who have managed not only to survive but also to thrive, in the administrations of George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama and now Donald Trump. Lawyers who worked with him call him a "consummate public servant," but his actions and self-proclaimed independence are now under scrutiny like never before.

Comment: More on Rosenstein's part in the Russiagate saga:


Briefcase

Intel Committee chair Nunes issues instructions, FBI to be charged with contempt of Congress

Nunes
Done playing games?
The FBI did not turn over the requested documents and Nunes is fighting back. With the release of the memo, people need to be held accountable.

Following the release of the bombshell FISA abuse memo, House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes is gearing up to revive his declaration to hold the FBI in contempt of Congress.

On Friday, the GOP memo was released detailing how former President Barack Obama's administration abused their power to trigger the phony Russia investigation into President Donald Trump.

The memo details how a slew of top Obama bureaucrats used the discredited dossier, which was compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele for the left-wing firm Fusion GPS, to secure a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to launch a surveillance campaign against Trump and his former campaign members.

Comment: Contempt of Congress:
Congress has the authority to hold a person in contempt if the person's conduct or action obstructs the proceedings of Congress or, more usually, an inquiry by a committee of Congress.

Contempt of Congress is defined in statute, 2 U.S.C.A. ยง 192, enacted in 1938, which states that any person who is summoned before Congress who "willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry" shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a maximum $1,000 fine and 12 month imprisonment.

Before a Congressional witness may be convicted of contempt, it must be established that the matter under investigation is a subject which Congress has constitutional power to legislate.

Generally, the same Constitutional rights against self-incrimination that apply in a judicial setting apply when one is testifying before Congress.

Caselaw:

Quinn v. U.S.,
349 U.S. 155, 75 S. Ct. 668, 99 L. Ed. 964, 51 A.L.R.2d 1157 (1955).
Fields v. U.S., 164 F.2d 97 (App. D.C. 1947)
Breitbart reported on Nunes' initial preparations for a contempt of Congress charge in December
House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) has instructed committee staff to prepare to cite the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in contempt of Congress after the agency failed to turn over documents explaining why agent Peter Strzok had been removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation.

Byron York of the Washington Examiner reported Saturday that the committee had subpoenaed the FBI in August for information about why Strzok was dropped from Mueller's team. Over the next three months, the FBI repeatedly refused to turn over the requested information. Nunes met and spoke to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, York reported, to no avail. Nunes and the committee continued to pursue the matter right up through Friday, Dec. 1.

The following day, the New York Times and the Washington Post reported that Strzok had been kicked off Mueller's team because of anti-Trump text messages that he was found to have exchanged with FBI lawyer Lisa Page during the 2016 presidential election. Strzok had also worked on the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's storage of emails, including classified information, on an illicit private server. She was not prosecuted.

In addition, Strzok and Page were found to have carried on an extramarital affair. Page worked for FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who conservatives have long complained had a conflict of interest because his wife received campaign funding from Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, a close ally of the Clintons for decades.

The revelation of Strzok's removal, and the reasons for it, are a huge blow to the credibility of Mueller's inquiry, which critics have long claimed is riddled with partisan conflicts of interest. Some of the lawyers working for Mueller had donated to Hillary Clinton, and one had even done work for the Clinton Foundation, which was a target of the Trump campaign during the election (and may have been under investigation by the FBI as well).

Nunes and the committee had known about Strzok's removal for months, but not the reasons for it, which were only revealed on Saturday in what York suggested was an "orchestrated leak" to the Times and the Post. In a furious statement on Saturday, Nunes accused the FBI of deliberately covering up political bias on the Mueller team.

"By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress' constitutional oversight responsibility," Nunes said, as quoted by York.

Nunes has reportedly promised to take action on the citation for contempt if the FBI does not come clean by the end of December. He will likely have the backing of Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI), who has also complained about the FBI's apparent refusal to turn over information to the committee, especially on the degree to which it relied on the discredited "Russia dossier" that was paid for by Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.

Earlier this year, Nunes stepped back from direct involvement in the committee's Russia investigation after questions about his role in exposing the "unmasking" of U.S. citizens in intelligence reports during the last days of the Obama administration. Democrats have stalled an ethics investigation into Nunes to keep him from resuming his role in a full capacity. However, Nunes has not given up his chairmanship and still wields the subpoena power.

During the Obama administration, Attorney General Eric Holder was found in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over documents on Operation Fast and Furious, which caused the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.



Control Panel

Inside the FBI: Fears of lasting damage as corrupted organization tries to reconstitute itself after Nunes memo

FBI Director Christopher A. Wray
© Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty ImagesOn Friday, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray sent a video message to those he leads, urging them to โ€œkeep calm and tackle hard.โ€
In the 109 years of the FBI's existence, it has repeatedly come under fire for abuses of power, privacy or civil rights. From Red Scares to recording and threatening to expose the private conduct of Martin Luther King Jr. to benefiting from bulk surveillance in the digital age, the FBI is accustomed to intense criticism.

What is so unusual about the current moment, say current and former law enforcement officials, is the source of the attacks.

The bureau is under fire not from those on the left but rather conservatives who have long been the agency's biggest supporters, as well as the president who handpicked the FBI's leader.

Republican critics charge that the birth of the investigation into possible coordination between the Trump campaign and agents of the Russian government was fatally infected by the political bias of senior FBI officials - and President Trump tweeted Saturday that the release of a memo on the issue "totally vindicates 'Trump.' "

Bureau officials say the accusations in the document produced by House Republicans are inaccurate and - more damaging in the long term - corrode the agency's ability to remain independent and do its job.

Attention

Riyadh risks 1979-like blowback in exploring anti-Iranian stance with Israel

bin Salman/al-Issa
© Clotaire Faisal Al Nasser/Reuters, Achi/ReutersCrown Prince Mohammad bin Salman โ€ข Dr. Mohammed al-Issa, former justice minister, MWL
The semi-secret security alliance between Saudi Arabia and Israel may be expanding into the sphere of ideology and street politics, but Riyadh may be at risk of tripping a conservative Islamist backlash.

The existence of some form of security and intelligence cooperation between Saudi Arabia and Israel is hardly news for Middle East observers. United by their mutual opposition to Iran and strong ties with the US, the two countries have plenty of things in common. Whatever differences people in the two countries may have over issues like the treatment of Palestinians by Israel, or of gay people by Saudi Arabia, their governments seem to stick to pragmatism in their relations.

This policy goes against the long history of animosity between Arabs and Jews, but is hardly unique for Riyadh. Egypt is another example - while its leaders publicly decry Israel's policies, they are reportedly all too eager to get a bit of Israeli help to fight Islamist insurgency in the Sinai Peninsula. The New York Times described it last week as a two-year-long bombing campaign that allowed Israeli officials to dismiss Egypt behind closed doors for not being able to defend its own territory.

There are some signs that Saudi Arabia may be prepared to expand on its ties with Israel, however, bringing it from a limited tactical union that common Arabs should better not think about, to something bigger. For instance, last month, the head of an influential Saudi-based religious organization sent a letter to a Holocaust museum in Washington, decrying the mass killing of Jews by Nazi Germany and blasting those who would deny those crimes.

Comment: The Crown Prince is a product of his society and legacy. Any sudden or remarkable deviation on his part could bring an avalanche of criticism and repercussions costing him more than his appointment. He must tiptoe through the 'mind' field of progressive diplomatic and societal change.


Post-It Note

The 'never-Trump' press close to panic over FBI memo

MEMO
© NDTV/KJN
"All the News That's Fit to Print" proclaims the masthead of the New York Times. "Democracy Dies in Darkness," echoes the Washington Post.

"The people have a right to know," the professors at Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism hammered into us in 1962. "Trust the people," we were admonished.

Explain then this hysteria, this panic in the press over the release of a four-page memo detailing one congressional committee's rendering of how Trump-hate spawned an FBI investigation of Republican candidate and President Donald Trump.

What is the press corps afraid of? For it has not ceased keening and caterwauling that this memo must not see the light of day.

Do the media not trust the people? Can Americans not handle the truth?

Is this the same press corps that celebrates The Post, lionizing Kay Graham for publishing the Pentagon Papers, top-secret documents charging the "Best and the Brightest" of the JFK-LBJ era with lying us into Vietnam?

Why are the media demanding a "safe space" for us all, so we will not be harmed by reading or hearing what the memo says? Security secrets will be compromised, we are warned.

Comment: A flag on the play. If nothing else, the release of the MEMO and the aftermath of public/press/government dialog it produced should be viewed as a wake-up call to the people, the media, government officials, Congress, the Executive Branch, and all agencies tasked with supporting and protecting constituents from such manipulating actions and inferences as found and implicated within the MEMO. Service agencies have guidelines and restrictions. Boundaries were breached.


Star of David

Netanyahu lays blame on Soros for thwarting his immigrant deportation program

NetiSoros
© Veterans TodayNetanyahu โ€ข Soros
This is not the first time that the billionaire involves himself in the immigration policy of a foreign country. The Israeli campaign is aimed at sending African immigrants and asylum seekers to an unnamed African country, forcibly if needed.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has allegedly accused Jewish-American billionaire of Hungarian origin George Soros of undermining the state's deportation program and "funding the protests". The incident reportedly happened during a weekly meeting of ministers from the ruling Likud party as a response to the science minister's comment that Israeli aid organizations had been receiving help from foreign governments and foundations, according to the local Channel 10 television channel.

Reports also claim that Netanyahu drew parallels between the Israeli deportation campaign and Obama's deportation of "two million infiltrators," which he noted remained undisputed. Israel's Population and Immigration Authority began notifying immigrants and asylum seekers from Eritrea and Sudan that they are to be deported to an unnamed African country with a relatively "stable government." In case they don't go voluntarily, they will be forcibly expelled starting April 1.

Comment: See also:


Bomb

Schiff's craziest claim yet: FISA memo may lead to Oklahoma City-style bombing

OKCity bombing/Schiff
© Brandon Haught/AP
Ranking member of the House Intel Committee and suspected leaker Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) perhaps made his craziest claim yet about the FISA memo.

Old Schiffty implied that an Oklahoma City Style bombing may occur due to Americans' distrust of the FBI after the FISA memo was released.

Schiff appeared on ABC Sunday morning to speak with George Stephanopoulos about the FISA memo.


Comment: Schiff concluded that our country is now less safe because the FISA memo was released. The country is less safe in the hands of those who think 'what the public doesn't know won't hurt it'. It is less safe in the hands of those who think 'what the public doesn't know will protect me.'

Another commentary on Schiff's prediction:




Arrow Up

The push to disbar James Comey after Clinton scandal

Comey
© AP/J. Scott ApplewhiteFormer FBI director James Comey
A crusading lawyer filed a bar grievance this week accusing former FBI Director James Comey of lying to Congress and destroying potential evidence in the Clinton email scandal, in a process that could end up costing him his law license.

Ty Clevenger filed the grievance in New York, where Mr. Comey was a former U.S. attorney and is licensed to practice law.

Mr. Clevenger said Mr. Comey's testimony to Congress that he did not predetermine the outcome of the FBI's probe into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is belied by revelations [...] that he in fact started drafting an exoneration months before even speaking with Mrs. Clinton.

"Insofar as Mr. Comey gave materially false testimony to Congress, it appears that he violated Rules 1.0(w), 3.3(a)(1), and 8.4 of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct," Mr. Clevenger wrote.

He also asked to renew grievances in New York against former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, saying Mr. Comey's claim that she tried to pressure him to downplay the Clinton probe should subject her to scrutiny. The state grievance committee had deferred an investigation in January, saying there were ongoing probes by Congress and they would await the outcome. Mr. Clevenger said this week that those probes appear to be over, so the time is ripe to renew the investigation.

Top Secret

FISA Court Judge James Boasberg has ruled Comey memos will remain secret

FBIguys
© The Intercept
The media are pointing out that a Federal District Court Judge has ruled against the release of the memos former FBI Director James Comey wrote to himself while acting head of the FBI. However, one little thing they fail to notice:
US FISAlist
© US FISA
WASHINGTON DC - A federal judge has rejected requests from news organizations to release memos of former FBI Director James Comey's conversations with President Donald Trump, adding that publicizing the documents could harm special counsel Robert Mueller's probe.

Comment: Senator Grassley points out in his letter: If four of seven Comey memos were marked classified and four were given to Professor Richman to 'detail memos to the press,' then Richman was given at least one classified memo that was subsequently revealed to a New York Times reporter. Judge Boasberg has put the kibosh on any reveals.


Tornado1

Unraveling of Pelosi, a sad sight

Pelosi
© iamatexan.comDemocratic Representative Nancy Pelosi
Nancy Pelosi, the top Democrat in the House of Representatives, is, in a word, a mess.

But let's pause for one moment to do something we almost never do: Offer a few words of praise for Mrs. Pelosi, born Nancy Patricia D'Alesandro in 1940. The Italian-American has spent nearly her whole life in politics, first as a 20-year member of the Democratic National Committee from California, then as the state party's chairman.

She first won election to the House in 1987 - when Ronald Reagan was president - and she's been there ever since. In 2002, after working her way to the top, Mrs. Pelosi was elected Speaker of the House, the first woman ever to helm a national party in the august chamber.

It cannot be denied that Mrs. Pelosi has devoted her life to public service, and that (at least) is a noble cause.

Now, the bad news. She's done - she's past done. Her ever-growing list of verbal blunders is far too long to catalog here, and the 77-year-old seems more and more out of touch with regular Americans (dubbing the recent tax cuts by President Trump - which amounts to thousands of dollars for many people - "crumbs" is just the latest example).

Worse, Mrs. Pelosi seems to keep coming up with new ways to embarrass herself.

Comment: Time to retire? Last year.