OF THE
TIMES



When people hear the word corruption, they usually think of money, envelopes, bribes, stolen budgets, officials living beyond their salaries. That image is convenient because it frames corruption as a moral defect, a flaw in character, a problem of bad individuals inside an otherwise normal system. And if that were true, the solution would be simple. Punish the bad people, clean the system, restore order.He draws on his experience growing up in Russia and the difficulties he had adapting to life in a Western nation — and the perspective this gave him on the nature of corruption. As he puts it, corruption is not something one enters into consciously. Rather, it is absorbed unconsciously from childhood. One learns it through trial and error — what works and what doesn't, which rules apply and which do not. This leads many to a profound disenchantment with official rules, forms, and institutions — with the surface of things in general — which are seen as fake or irrelevant. Outcomes in the real world depend on things like personal connections, timing, leverage, the mood of officials, and informal signals rather than formal processes.
But corruption survives for decades, not because people are immoral, and not because enforcement is weak. It survives because it quietly replaces something much more important than money. It replaces the relationship between a person and reality.
The below transcript is from Prof. Alexander Dugin's latest talk on the Radio Sputnik Escalation Show:Radio Sputnik, Escalation Show Host: So, the US Department of Justice has finally published the Epstein lists: 3 million files that journalists are now actively sorting through. Some things look terrible, others comical, especially when individual names appearing in these materials are taken out of context. They found Zhirinovsky, Lenin, and even characters from films and cartoons.
Comment: Norman Finklestein is the exemplar of the appropriate response. Kudos to him. Moral clarity is vanishingly rare these days.