Rubble
© Eyad Baba/AFP/Getty ImagesPalestinians inspect rubble and debris at the site of Israeli strikes at the Nuseirat refugee camp • Central Gaza Strip • March 23, 2025
In relaunching the Gaza war last week after the breakdown of ceasefire negotiations, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz looks set to deliver on his threat to Hamas: "The gates of Gaza will be locked, and the gates of hell will open."

But this latest round of fighting isn't just an unspeakable tragedy for Gaza and its people. It also gives the world a snapshot of the future - of the post, post-Second World War international order in an era of conquest.

The American guarantee of a predictable and stable world is over. The Trump administration now questions basic norms governing international relations.

The 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention, for instance, protects civilians in time of war, including those in occupied territories, and prohibits the forced displacement of civilians.

Article Two of the United Nations Charter not only prohibits states from annexing territory by threat or conquest but serves as a bedrock principle of international law and modern history.

These norms were birthed from the ashes of two world wars, and they represent collective values, not guaranteed outcomes. Obviously, history demonstrates that many countries have fallen short of their obligations, but these aspirations still provide an international lodestar. This order now has devolved to the point where states regard basic tenets of international law as inconvenient constraints on their imperial designs.

Gaza is a telling witness. Israel had to respond and defend itself after Hamas unleashed its horrific October 7 attack on innocents. Seventeen months later, however, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has failed to achieve his declared wartime goals of vanquishing Hamas and freeing the hostages. As the relative calm of the ceasefire showed, Hamas remains in firm control of all aspects of Gazan life.


Comment: Consider it 'planned failure'. Hamas provides the excuse to continue the genocide and destruction for as long as Netanyahu needs or wants it. Capture Hamas, free the hostages? The war is over by definition.


Despite its shortcomings in Gaza, Israel was able to establish credible deterrence over Hezbollah and Iran, thereby isolating Hamas from its most militant allies. Given Israel's failures thus far, the next round of fighting will likely be more brutal and unpredictable - and Mr. Netanyahu has chosen to continue the conflict over negotiating the release of the hostages, with the full support of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Re-armed with 2,000-pound bombs from America, Mr. Netanyahu will almost certainly pursue a maximalist strategy to push much of the Gazan population into Egypt and regain full long-term occupational control over the Mediterranean coastal enclave. Mr. Netanyahu and his right-wing allies in the Knesset also have designs on the West Bank. Mr. Netanyahu's government is signalling plans to annex large portions of the West Bank into Eretz Yisrael (greater Israel), having sensed that it has a historical opportunity to seize territory at the expense of Palestinian aspirations for statehood. And it appears there will be no consequences for these decisions.


Comment: The consequences are: the massacre of thousands of Palestinians and the total destruction of Gaza. They weren't 'displaced'. They lost their lives, not their aspirations.


An expansionist Israel indefinitely occupying Gaza after forcibly displacing large swaths of the civilian population which further annexes substantial portions of the West Bank will unleash this new era of conquest. In a world where war has no rules, Gaza is just the beginning.

As the battle in Gaza unfolds, Russia and the United States may well impose a settlement on Ukraine, against the will of the Ukrainian people. China too will see an opportunity to seize its own breakaway province, Taiwan, under the disinterested gaze of a compliant America. In doing so, the great powers will have cemented a legacy: the idea that stronger nations can simply seize the land of their weaker neighbours.

There will, of course, be handwringing by free nations, civil society and international media. A bygone time of values-based alliances, democratic norms and an empowered United Nations will seem quaint.

Finally, the United States' complicity in the imperial expansion of other powers does not fully answer the question about its own strategic intentions. Donald Trump has been clear: He wants the Panama Canal, Greenland and Canada to be integrated into a continental America. He has made these demands often and repeatedly, without diplomatic niceties or the consent of Panamanians, Greenlanders or Canadians. Yet, the American people and its allies simply do not know if Mr. Trump's rhetoric is bluster or the precursor to conquest. But in a world where war has no rules, in an era of conquest, the United States under Donald Trump is more likely to take reckless, expansionist actions that threaten collective peace and stability. The future is before us - and in Gaza, of all places.


Comment: What collective peace and stability would that be exactly? The future is not in Gaza. Gaza is now the graveyard of the past.


Author: R. David Harden is the former assistant administrator at USAID's bureau for democracy, conflict and humanitarian assistance. In this role, he oversaw global democracy and governance efforts in fragile states.