© EricPetersAuto.com
It begins with the orchestrated removal of Donald Trump from office via "the pandemic," which made feasible an unprecedented and still unaccounted for increase in the number of votes awarded to Joe Biden, an improbable candidate who hardly campaigned for the office yet won it (so we were told) by winning even more votes than Barack Obama at the peak of his popularity.
The 2024 re-election of Donald Trump revealed this disparity - via millions fewer votes cast, which is strongly suggestive of something sketchy back in 2020.
© EricPetersAuto.com
Almost immediately, the message is projected that anyone who wants to come across the border can and should come across the border. From wherever. It doesn't matter. No problemo! Just come. Millions apparently have. This predictably created a politically potent issue for the now-former president to rally his supporters around. Trump's successful re-election effort was largely propelled by angst and anger about not just the deliberate importation of those millions but also the preferential status enjoyed by those millions.The myriad petty tyrannies imposed on Americans did not seem to be imposed on them. An American citizen who gets caught driving without a license goes to the clink. An "immigrant" - as these non-citizen foreigners here illegally are effronterously styled - gets a debit card loaded with thousands of dollars of "free" spending money. Maybe also a "free" room in a hotel most Americans can't afford to stay in.
It was deliberately egregious. As if designed to provoke a counter-reaction.
It came in the form of the repudiation of Biden's hurriedly selected successor - who was herself effronterously foisted on the rank-and-file of her party after what can plausibly be described as a deliberate airing of Biden's cognitive incapacity for all to see. The people around Biden had to know he was not fit for prime time. So why was he placed in that position, in front of a national audience? The question begs an alarmingly obvious answer. Biden did not have to appear on live TV to debate Trump. He avoided debating him in 2020. He could have done the same again in 2024. It might have seemed haughty - or fearful - but either would have been better than being seen as obviously senile.
© EricPetersAuto.com
Well, he won.
With a clear mandate this time (electoral and popular vote) to do something about the "out of control" border and the millions of random people from God-knows-where and God-only-knows where they are now.
© EricPetersAuto.com
How will millions of random people from God-knows-where and God-only-knows where they are now be identified and located? In order to do something about them, such as deport them?
There is only one realistic way they can be identified and located. It is by identifying and locating us. How else to separate out American citizens who are in this country legally and foreigners who are here illegally? Some form of government-acceptable identification will be not merely be necessary; American citizens are already effectively required to have this and to carry it with them in order to legally buy cough syrup or cash a check (as well as legally drive a car).
© EricPetersAuto.com
© EricPetersAuto.com
Is that the plan?
How else could it be done?
Well, there are other ways and one doesn't even require deportation. Trump could issue an executive order making it a federal crime for any government office-holder (elected or bureaucrat) to provide or facilitate the providing of government benefits of any kind to anyone who is not an American citizen. This would not entail a regime of internal passports and checkpoints for everyone who is in America. It would only entail that those seeking government benefits identify themselves as eligible to receive them. Those who cannot prove they have a right to be here have no right to any government-provided alms financed by American citizens.
© EricPetersAuto.com
But will Trump do that? Or will he do something else? And if he does that something else, was it all part of the plan, all along?
Hegel, phone home.
What no one ever, ever mentions is that Trump added 11.2M votes, making the difference in net new only 3M votes - and most of those came in California. Biden's margin was 5.1M in 2020, compared to Harris' margin of 3.1M in 2024. Trump picked up only 86K in California in 2024, which means the rest are represented by the 2020 spike in ballots. So why would someone embark on a multi-million ballot-stuffing campaign in a state that is already guaranteed for the Democrat candidate?
If one focuses on *all* of the facts, instead of the ones that are convenient for one's agenda, then other plausible explanations are available, such that states mailed ballots to voters who did not request one, creating a voter base that did not exist before, and who stayed home this time around - that would certainly explain the vote spike in California.
In the swing states, did Trump lose by millions of votes? No. He lost by 12,000 votes in GA, 20,000 in WI, and 150,000 in MI. It seems to me, these would be the states where you would distribute 3,000,000 extra ballots - not California.
Yes, there were voting irregularities in 2020 - as in all elections, and perhaps some of them were enough to push states like GA into the blue. But to suggest that millions of fraudulent ballots were cast in the wrong states as part of a global election-stealing campaign exceeds the bounds of wisdom.