The research made clever use of a well-known trick called the one-is-more illusion, which fools the brains of listeners into thinking two discrete sounds are shorter than one single sound, even though in reality the total time is the same.
Replacing sounds with silence, the team found that the illusion still worked. You can try it out for yourself. A single continuous silence is perceived as being longer than two separate silences, despite them actually being the same duration overall.
"Silence, whatever it is, is not a sound - it's the absence of sound," says Rui Zhe Goh, a graduate student in philosophy and psychology from Johns Hopkins University. "Surprisingly, what our work suggests is that nothing is also something you can hear."
The researchers posit that because we're reacting to silence in the same way as sound in these tricks, we're truly hearing that silence - not just inferring that it's there. It seems as though Simon & Garfunkel were on to something.
A total of 1,000 participants were recruited across seven experiments. As well as the one-is-more illusion, other similar tests were carried out, covering partial silences and silences that varied in how close together or far apart they were.
Background noises like busy restaurants and train stations were used the frame the silences for some experiments, for others there were variances in tones.

"The kinds of illusions and effects that look like they are unique to the auditory processing of a sound, we also get them with silences, suggesting we really do hear absences of sound too," says Ian Phillips, a a philosopher and psychologist at John Hopkins University.
Many studies now show that silence can be important in perceiving sounds - like the way we leave pauses between words - but until this point there hasn't been any solid experimental evidence that silence itself can serve as a stimulus that the brain hears.
Next, the team wants to look at how we might perceive silence if it is totally disconnected from sound (and not embedded in it, as in these experiments). It also raises the question of whether or not we ever experience perfect silence, and could help in the treatment of various hearing problems.
"Philosophers have long debated whether silence is something we can literally perceive, but there hasn't been a scientific study aimed directly at this question," says Chaz Firestone, a cognitive scientist at John Hopkins University.
The research has been published in PNAS.
David Nield is a Contributing Journalist at ScienceAlert. He's a freelance journalist who has been writing about science and technology for more than 20 years. Dave's work has appeared in a wide range of publications, including Wired, Popular Science, The Guardian, and Gizmodo, and he has been reporting for ScienceAlert across a variety of subjects since 2015.




Reader Comments
[Link]
Carbon neutrality acheived.
Ffs, this is like the article, don't remember it exactly, which explained what had happened before the beginning...can there be a 'before the beginning'? After the end? Sometimes I think I could eat my own face with a spork and it would make more sense....
It the observer and those that do not observe. Can it in reality be true, is really be nothing more than a wave formation, crated by the material aspect of a tree falling
Maybe, very loosely, to bring into context, I used live in a logging community, we knew, that logs were harvested, but nobody in the community were ever aware in a material sense,of logs falling, other than they provided income to the community.
We only saw them on logging trucks, leaving the village, to whatever there destination was on a sheet of paper.
And I see many logging trucks traverse the highway to this day..
It begs the question of all creation, who is the creator, and who is the observer, and also, does the observer influence the creator?
So I don't believe there is ever real silence, only a perception of silence - if you focus really hard in the quiet, you can always hear the motion.
Is the mind able to interpret all the messages from the universe, let alone all the shite we are inundated with on a daily basis. In our so called technological age (mind controlled).
We don't stand a chance, video games, porno, everything all your mind program desires.
All brought to you by the science that we were told to trust, and now are destroying families and lives.
If you can't see anything are you blind or sightless?
If you can't taste it, is then tasteless ?
SFQ philosophers on drugs.
Idiot scientists justifying their grants, is what I read, didn't hear them say it either, so must be silence or science.
if one's body was to stop functioning ( no internal background noise), the ability to perceive silence would be zero, so? It could be said that everything that is living on planet Earth makes a noise, so does Earth, so does our Solar System, our Sun and the Universe beyond.
So I question if the concept of silence exists?